Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644 vs Qualcomm Adreno 618
Qualcomm Adreno 642 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 644 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642 , its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.
The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 618 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 618 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 and 730G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
In our benchmarks, the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 730 was 14 to 30% faster than the Adreno 616 in the Snapdragon 710. The performance in the 730G should be additional 15% faster, due to higher clock rates.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
Qualcomm Adreno 642 Qualcomm Adreno 644 Qualcomm Adreno 618 Adreno 600 Series Shared Memory yes yes yes API OpenGL ES 3.2 OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan technology 5 nm 4 nm 14 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) Date of Announcement 07.05.2021 07.05.2021 09.04.2019 Predecessor Adreno 642 Architecture Adreno 600
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
129 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
112 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 44009 avg: 51701 median: 52650 (6%) max: 56640 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
2900 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
3273 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
494 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
504 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5587 Points (24%)
min: 6303 avg: 6921 median: 6953.5 (30%) max: 7472 Points
min: 3002 avg: 3603 median: 3646 (16%) max: 3939 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
8380 Points (18%)
min: 8656 avg: 8893 median: 8751 (19%) max: 9414 Points
min: 3101 avg: 3734 median: 3753.5 (8%) max: 4256 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
4478 Points (22%)
min: 5501 avg: 6172 median: 6286 (31%) max: 6466 Points
min: 2214 avg: 2624 median: 2626 (13%) max: 2938 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
6148 Points (18%)
min: 6767 avg: 7065 median: 7023 (21%) max: 7388 Points
min: 2085 avg: 2495 median: 2471 (7%) max: 2832 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
3212 Points (2%)
min: 3035 avg: 3133 median: 3143 (2%) max: 3184 Points
min: 637 avg: 899 median: 934 (0%) max: 1124 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
786 Points (1%)
min: 825 avg: 834 median: 829 (1%) max: 854 Points
min: 258 avg: 447 median: 313 (0%) max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
1921 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
1849 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 624 avg: 639 median: 645 (1%) max: 648 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 572 avg: 590 median: 599 (1%) max: 599 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 618 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
288 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7 avg: 7.5 median: 7.5 (3%) max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
18 fps (3%)
min: 15 avg: 16.6 median: 17 (3%) max: 18 fps
min: 5.4 avg: 7 median: 6.9 (1%) max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
50 fps (4%)
min: 41 avg: 46 median: 47 (3%) max: 49 fps
min: 15 avg: 18.1 median: 18 (1%) max: 21 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
40 fps (5%)
min: 37 avg: 38.2 median: 38 (4%) max: 40 fps
min: 14 avg: 17.1 median: 17 (2%) max: 19 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
65 fps (1%)
min: 52 avg: 62.4 median: 65 (1%) max: 67 fps
min: 24 avg: 29.8 median: 30 (1%) max: 33 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
90 fps (5%)
min: 86 avg: 89.2 median: 88 (5%) max: 94 fps
min: 34 avg: 40.9 median: 41 (2%) max: 45 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
153 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147 avg: 150.2 median: 148 (1%) max: 158 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 618
min: 67 avg: 83.1 median: 84.5 (1%) max: 91 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
162946 Points (20%)
min: 174679 avg: 177977 median: 175343 (22%) max: 187645 Points
min: 74888 avg: 89032 median: 90943.5 (11%) max: 95350 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
48 fps (0%)
min: 50.74 avg: 51.7 median: 51.7 (0%) max: 52.63 fps
min: 23.89 avg: 26.3 median: 26.3 (0%) max: 28.78 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2496 avg: 2535 median: 2498 (1%) max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650 avg: 2794 median: 2738 (1%) max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
30029 Points (30%)
min: 10269 avg: 16045 median: 10289 (10%) max: 27578 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42541 Points (74%)
min: 3043 avg: 9739 median: 3056 (5%) max: 23117 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19 avg: 4.8 median: 4.6 (2%) max: 5.9 Watt
3.4 Watt (1%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% n=14 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 106% n=14 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 47% n=14
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 644:
42 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
36 fps, max:
45 fps
fps
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
40 fps, max:
46 fps
fps
223%
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
44 fps, max:
45 fps
89 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
84 fps, max:
90 fps
~ 67 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
68%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
fps
68%
Adreno 618:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
67%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
34 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
22 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
38 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
40 ~ 40 fps
Adreno 618:
60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 9T 1.18.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 2.2GHz
Adreno 618
min:
1 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Honor 90 5G 1.9.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 644:
60 61 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 3.9.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 61 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 114% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 114%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 78% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 106%
Qualcomm Adreno 644 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 42 45 Armajet 67 PUBG Mobile 60 40 40 Dead Trigger 2 60 Subway Surfers 61 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 3 1
Qualcomm Adreno 618 low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 114 99 83.5 Call of Duty Mobile 60 58 57 Armajet 56 PUBG Mobile 38 40 30 Arena of Valor 54 55 Shadow Fight 3 60 60 Dota 2 Reborn 27.6 19.7 9.6 8.7 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 BioShock Infinite 23 17.6 16.9 Diablo III 20.7 20 17.2 12 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 3 3 3 1 3 5 2 2 2 1
Qualcomm Adreno 642 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 60 59 60 40 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 1 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 02. 22:53:32
#0 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9900 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:36:19 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.123s ... 0.125s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.125s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.125s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.038s ... 0.163s
#9 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.006s ... 0.169s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.002s ... 0.171s
#11 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.014s ... 0.185s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9900 +0.002s ... 0.187s
#13 got single benchmarks 9900 +0.054s ... 0.241s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.241s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.153s ... 0.394s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.394s
#17 Got 103 rows for game benchmarks. +0.02s ... 0.414s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.414s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.007s ... 0.421s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.029s ... 0.45s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.45s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.452s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)