Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs Samsung Xclipse 940 vs Qualcomm Adreno 610

Qualcomm Adreno 619L

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

Qualcomm Adreno 610

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 610 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

In synthetic benchmarks, the Adreno 610 positions itself between the old Adreno 510 and Adreno 512 / 612

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 619LSamsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 610
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology8 nm4 nm11 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 09.10.2023 09.04.2019
CPU in Adreno 619LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 610GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6658 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? MHz? - 1050 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
min: 15403     avg: 22761     median: 24487.5 (2%)     max: 25351 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122     avg: 3225     median: 3224.5 (14%)     max: 3327 Points
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
min: 975     avg: 1855     median: 1827.5 (8%)     max: 2254 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307     avg: 3311     median: 3311 (7%)     max: 3315 Points
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
min: 1295     avg: 1759     median: 1746.5 (4%)     max: 2187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308     avg: 2328     median: 2328 (10%)     max: 2348 Points
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
min: 267     avg: 1178     median: 1175.5 (5%)     max: 1597 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120     avg: 2154     median: 2153.5 (5%)     max: 2187 Points
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
min: 240     avg: 1040     median: 1033 (3%)     max: 1436 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 3208     avg: 3212     median: 3211.5 (29%)     max: 3215 Points
min: 1400     avg: 1836     median: 1797 (16%)     max: 2222 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3197     avg: 3201     median: 3200.5 (19%)     max: 3204 Points
min: 1270     avg: 1713     median: 1691 (10%)     max: 2095 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2178     avg: 2188     median: 2188 (11%)     max: 2198 Points
min: 854     avg: 1210     median: 1164 (6%)     max: 1905 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1982     avg: 1987     median: 1987 (7%)     max: 1992 Points
min: 726     avg: 1040     median: 1021 (3%)     max: 1394 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (0%)     max: 826 Points
min: 12652     avg: 13199     median: 13098 (7%)     max: 13847 Points
min: 205     avg: 414.2     median: 433 (0%)     max: 634 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
min: 3933     avg: 4182     median: 4235 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
min: 100     avg: 120.4     median: 122 (0%)     max: 141 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32     median: 32 (12%)     max: 34 fps
min: 1.1     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (1%)     max: 1.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
min: 69     avg: 77.7     median: 75 (13%)     max: 89 fps
min: 1.4     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (1%)     max: 16 fps
min: 153     avg: 161     median: 154 (11%)     max: 176 fps
min: 5.1     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (1%)     max: 10.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (1%)     max: 15 fps
min: 130     avg: 133.3     median: 131 (12%)     max: 139 fps
min: 5.2     avg: 7.3     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
min: 214     avg: 224.3     median: 215 (5%)     max: 244 fps
min: 9.3     avg: 13.3     median: 13 (0%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 36     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (2%)     max: 37 fps
min: 269     avg: 289.3     median: 289 (12%)     max: 310 fps
min: 14     avg: 19.5     median: 19 (1%)     max: 24 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (1%)     max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
min: 378     avg: 388.3     median: 384 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 610
min: 24     avg: 36.1     median: 36 (0%)     max: 45 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (8%)
min: 23743     avg: 39171     median: 38601 (4%)     max: 53821 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 637825     median: 617384 (49%)     max: 682510 Points
min: 40315     avg: 41445     median: 40525 (3%)     max: 44415 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78     avg: 22.8     median: 22.8 (1%)     max: 22.85 fps
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
min: 8.79     avg: 11.7     median: 11.4 (0%)     max: 14.76 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 16906     avg: 16942     median: 16932 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
min: 343     avg: 347.7     median: 349 (0%)     max: 351 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16059     median: 16078 (4%)     max: 16087 Points
577 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (4%)
min: 7370     avg: 16213     median: 17873 (6%)     max: 21734 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
min: 1595     avg: 12281     median: 13408 (22%)     max: 20711 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)
min: 10.2     avg: 11.5     median: 11 (4%)     max: 13.2 Watt
min: 2.25     avg: 3.4     median: 3 (1%)     max: 6.42 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 1018% n=13

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 51% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 610:
25.6  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 610:
26.5  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 610:
60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Adreno 610:
56 59 60 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Adreno 610:
42 59 ~ 51 fps
high
Adreno 610:
40  fps
ultra
Adreno 610:
29  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Xclipse 940:
58 59 60 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 610:
26.3 27.7 29.2 37 37 ~ 31 fps
med.
Adreno 610:
15  fps
ultra
Xclipse 940:
47 58 59 ~ 55 fps
Adreno 610:
11 13 13.1 14 15 ~ 13 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 38 44 50 53 54 57 57 59 59 60 60 60 87 ~ 52 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
218%
Xclipse 940:
81 90 90 ~ 87 fps
78%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 38.8 39.8 ~ 31 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
63%
Adreno 610:
25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 29.5 29.9 ~ 25 fps
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
197%
Xclipse 940:
57 60 60 ~ 59 fps
83%
Adreno 610:
25  fps
ultra
Xclipse 940:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps
ultra
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
190%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps
103%
Adreno 610:
60 60 66 ~ 62 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 610:
20 20 24 26 30 59 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
29  fps
69%
Adreno 610:
11 12 15 17 22 23 41.5 ~ 20 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Adreno 610:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 201%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 197%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 79%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 90%

Qualcomm Adreno 619LSamsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 610
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal25.626.5
League of Legends: Wild Rift606059
Call of Duty Mobile514029
Genshin Impact5955311513
Armajet52
PUBG Mobile404030875940312525
Arena of Valor3838
Dead Trigger 26011462
Asphalt 9: Legends293020
Temple Run 260
Qualcomm Adreno 619LSamsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 610
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1


1

1
1
1


1






< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
5
1
2


2
3
2
3
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 19. 14:10:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9921 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752927010s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:29:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.016s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.016s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.006s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.001s ... 0.022s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0s ... 0.022s

#12 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.006s ... 0.029s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9921 +0s ... 0.029s

#14 got single benchmarks 9921 +0.007s ... 0.036s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.058s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.058s

#18 Got 141 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.076s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.076s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.077s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.081s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.081s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.081s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)