Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A10-9600P vs Intel Core i7-7660U vs AMD A12-9700P

AMD A10-9600P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-9600P

The AMD A10-9600P is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz. It was announced in mid 2016 and is based on the same silicon as Carrizo but with more and refined features. It is a ULV-chip with a TDP of 15 Watt and integrates a Radeon R5 graphics card (384 shader cores / 6 compute cores) and a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. As Carrizo its a full featured SoC that offers all I/O ports on the chip.

The A10-9600P is slightly faster than the old 15-Watt top model of Carrizo, the FX-8800P. Therefore, the CPU performance is similar to a Broadwell 15 Watt Core i3 like The i3-5010U. See our Bristol Ridge article for more information on the architecture and improvements compared to Carrizo.

Intel Core i7-7660U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7660U

The Intel Core i7-7660U is a fast dual-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. The CPU has two processor cores clocked at 2.5-4 GHz (two cores up to 3.8 GHz). The processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper Threading. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 GPU with 64 MB eDRAm, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to the Core i7-7600U, the 7660 does have a higher single-core Turbo of 4 GHz (+100 MHz), but a lower dual-core Turbo (-100 MHz) and a lower base frequency (-300 MHz). However, the CPU part can also use the 64 MB eDRAM as L5 cache.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

At 2.5-4 GHz, the Core i7-7660U has a slightly lower frequency (except for the single-core Turbo) compared to the Core i7-7600U, but the CPU part can also use the 64 MB eDRAM, so the performance should be similar.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 640 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 920MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Pro 540, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

AMD A12-9700P

► remove from comparison AMD A12-9700P

The AMD A12-9700P is a mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The ULV chip with a TDP of 15 Watts (can be configured to 12 Watts) has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The performance of the A12-9700P is between the two 15-Watt processors A10-9600P and FX-9800P, and therefore roughly on par with a 15-Watt Core i3 from the Skylake or Kaby Lake series, respectively. Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores. Due to the TDP limitation, the performance of the A12-9700P will drop significantly under sustained workloads.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9700P with 15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

ModelAMD A10-9600PIntel Core i7-7660UAMD A12-9700P
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby LakeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameBristol RidgeKaby LakeBristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-77003.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v63.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v63 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-75003.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U « 2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y751.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y571.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y541.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y321 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y301 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P « 2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock2400 - 3300 MHz2500 - 4000 MHz2500 - 3400 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm28 nm
Die Size250 mm2250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C90 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (300 - 1050 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comproducts.amd.com
L1 Cache128 KB
L3 Cache4 MB
SocketBGA1356FP4
$415 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 195     avg: 211     median: 216 (1%)     max: 217 Points
min: 397     avg: 403.5     median: 403.5 (3%)     max: 410 Points
min: 222     avg: 225.5     median: 225.5 (1%)     max: 229 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 70     avg: 74.8     median: 76 (23%)     max: 77 Points
min: 154     avg: 158.5     median: 158.5 (48%)     max: 163 Points
min: 78     avg: 79     median: 79 (24%)     max: 80 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.59     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.6 Points
min: 4.39     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (6%)     max: 4.55 Points
min: 1.92     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.87     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (22%)     max: 0.9 Points
min: 1.84     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (46%)     max: 1.89 Points
min: 0.76     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (21%)     max: 0.94 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2340     avg: 2439     median: 2447 (15%)     max: 2520 Points
min: 6126     avg: 6170     median: 6169.5 (37%)     max: 6213 Points
min: 2262     avg: 2429     median: 2429 (15%)     max: 2596 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5913     avg: 6467     median: 6508 (5%)     max: 6939 Points
min: 13779     avg: 13809     median: 13808.5 (10%)     max: 13838 Points
min: 5148     avg: 6168     median: 6168 (4%)     max: 7188 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
534 s (6%)
min: 433     avg: 435.5     median: 435.5 (5%)     max: 438 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.3 s (3%)
min: 12.6     avg: 12.9     median: 12.9 (3%)     max: 13.2 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1526 Points (2%)
1462 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
16.3 fps (6%)
min: 25     avg: 25.3     median: 25.3 (9%)     max: 25.6 fps
16.7 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
85.4 fps (20%)
min: 134     avg: 136.5     median: 136.5 (31%)     max: 139 fps
84.6 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
0.4 GB/s (7%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.5 GB/s (4%)
2.4 GB/s (6%)
1.8 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1257 Seconds (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2969     avg: 3224     median: 3287 (7%)     max: 3352 Points
min: 5193     avg: 5227     median: 5226.5 (11%)     max: 5260 Points
min: 3344     avg: 3498     median: 3498 (7%)     max: 3652 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.7 s (4%)
19.2 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.3 s (2%)
42.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
942 s (4%)
980 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 7115     avg: 7516     median: 7515.5 (7%)     max: 7916 Points
7608 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2246     avg: 2418     median: 2387 (6%)     max: 2634 Points
min: 4463     avg: 5069     median: 5230 (14%)     max: 5513 Points
min: 2524     avg: 2527     median: 2527 (7%)     max: 2530 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 21570     avg: 23140     median: 23093 (19%)     max: 24803 Points
25886 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 18940     avg: 21504     median: 21065.5 (17%)     max: 24944 Points
25743 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 22601     avg: 25235     median: 26061 (22%)     max: 26217 Points
57582 Points (49%)
27373 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1722     avg: 2000     median: 2031.5 (5%)     max: 2214 Points
min: 3823     avg: 3936     median: 3935.5 (10%)     max: 4048 Points
min: 2283     avg: 2306     median: 2306 (6%)     max: 2329 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2455     avg: 2912     median: 2981 (5%)     max: 3229 Points
min: 5412     avg: 5561     median: 5560.5 (10%)     max: 5709 Points
min: 2981     avg: 3125     median: 3124.5 (6%)     max: 3268 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1045 Points (4%)
min: 1979     avg: 1990     median: 1989.5 (8%)     max: 2000 Points
1069 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4786 Points (48%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9320 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2047 Points (28%)
4603 Points (63%)
2158 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4711 Points (11%)
8952 Points (22%)
4899 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5252     avg: 5386     median: 5423 (10%)     max: 5445 Points
min: 5371     avg: 5464     median: 5464 (10%)     max: 5557 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 2000     avg: 2064     median: 2074 (41%)     max: 2109 Points
min: 2062     avg: 2091     median: 2091 (41%)     max: 2120 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5702 Points (9%)
8570 Points (13%)
5824 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2237 Points (33%)
4074 Points (61%)
2308 Points (35%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2098     avg: 2251     median: 2328 (3%)     max: 2328 ms
min: 927     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (1%)     max: 948 ms
2059 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 133.3     avg: 138.2     median: 133.3 (1%)     max: 148.1 ms
min: 65.2     avg: 65.6     median: 65.6 (1%)     max: 66 ms
164.9 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 18921     avg: 19501     median: 19791 (18%)     max: 19791 Points
min: 35767     avg: 36437     median: 36436.5 (33%)     max: 37106 Points
19404 Points (17%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.2     avg: 40     median: 40 (7%)     max: 40.8 Watt
31.9 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.2     avg: 40     median: 40 (7%)     max: 40.8 Watt
33.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 9.73     avg: 10.1     median: 10.1 (8%)     max: 10.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-9600P → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7660U → 177% n=24

Average Benchmarks AMD A12-9700P → 103% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 17. 01:58:16

#0 checking url part for id 8094 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8419 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8166 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.042s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8094 +0.003s ... 0.045s

#8 got single benchmarks 8094 +0.026s ... 0.071s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8419 +0.004s ... 0.074s

#10 got single benchmarks 8419 +0.01s ... 0.085s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8166 +0.003s ... 0.088s

#12 got single benchmarks 8166 +0.013s ... 0.101s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.101s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.394s ... 0.495s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.495s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)