Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-6700 vs Intel Core i5-9400F vs Intel Core i9-9900T

Intel Core i7-6700

► remove from comparison Intel 6700

The Intel Core i7-6700 is a high-end quad-core desktop processor based on the Skylake architecture, which was announced in August 2015. The CPU, which is manufactured in a 14 nm process, runs at 3.4 up to 4.0 GHz (2 cores: 3.9 GHz, 4 cores: 3.7 GHz) and can execute up to 8 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyperthreading. Contrary to the Core i7-6700K, the i7-6700 does not have a free multiplier and can hardly be overclocked. 

Architecture

Intel uses Skylake to replace both Broadwell and Haswell and therefore once again uses one core design for all TDP classes. Several improvements of the Skylake architecture include bigger Out-to-Order-Buffer, optimizations for pre-fetching as well as bigger gains by Hyperthreading. However, the changes are small for a "Tock" – a new micro architecture – in general, so the per-MHz performance is only between 5-10 % (compared to Haswell) or less than 5 % higher (compared to Broadwell), respectively.

Performance

Even though the Core i7-6700 has a slightly lower clock than the old i7-4790 (3.6 GHz - 4.0 GHz), the performance is slightly better compared to the Haswell predecessor. Another 7 % faster is the top model i7-6700K. Even the most demanding applications and games are no problem for the high-end CPU.

Graphics

Graphics are handled by the integrated Intel HD Graphics 530 with 24 EUs (Execution Units), which is clocked at 350 - 1150 MHz. Compared to the HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell, 20 EUs), the performance is increased by around 25 percent. The overall GPU performance is still low-end, so modern games can, if at all, only be played smoothly with low settings. 

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 Watts.

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

Intel Core i9-9900T

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9900T

The Intel Core i9-9900T is a high end power efficient desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. Compared to the similar named top model Core i9-9900K, the 9900T offers lower clock speeds (2.1 - 4.4 GHz versus 3.6 - 5 GHz) and a reduced TDP of 35 versus 95 Watt. It still offers all 8 cores and 16 threads and is intended for small chassis or laptops.

The performance is clearly behind the Core i9-9900K and more in the realm of the older 6-core Coffee Lake CPUs.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

ModelIntel Core i7-6700Intel Core i5-9400FIntel Core i9-9900T
CodenameSkylakeCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-R
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i7-6700K4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700 « 3.4 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700T2.8 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T « 2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock3400 - 4000 MHz2900 - 4100 MHz2100 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB9 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 68 / 16
TDP65 Watt65 Watt35 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14++ nm
SocketFCLGA1151LGA 1151-2FCLGA1151
FeaturesDDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 530 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$303 U.S.$182 U.S.$439 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Voltage100 V
Die Size149 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
28.8 pt (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900T
29.9 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
416 Points (45%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2378 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
6700 +
min: 743     avg: 791     median: 802 (5%)     max: 817 Points
984 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
6700 +
min: 117     avg: 156.3     median: 168.5 (47%)     max: 171 Points
173 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
6700 +
min: 8.69     avg: 8.8     median: 8.9 (11%)     max: 8.94 Points
11.3 Points (15%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
6700 +
min: 1.89     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (46%)     max: 1.94 Points
2 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
6700 +
min: 5634     avg: 6003     median: 6002.5 (36%)     max: 6371 Points
6490 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
6700 +
min: 24237     avg: 24305     median: 24304.5 (18%)     max: 24372 Points
31523 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 6700 +
31339 Points (20%)
40065 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 6700 +
8213 Points (10%)
8182 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
6700 +
209 s (2%)
198.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
6700 +
6.8 s (1%)
6.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
6700 +
min: 5323     avg: 5413     median: 5412.5 (9%)     max: 5502 Points
5794 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
25639 MIPS (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4678 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
6700 +
50.8 fps (17%)
64 fps (21%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
6700 +
187.4 fps (43%)
234 fps (54%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.1 fps (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
6700 +
min: 0.46     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (14%)     max: 0.465 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
6700 +
min: 0.77     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.781 GB/s
0.9 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
6700 +
min: 4.4     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (12%)     max: 4.5 GB/s
5.2 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
468.5 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 6700 +
min: 8199     avg: 8403     median: 8478 (18%)     max: 8532 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
6700 +
min: 9.3     avg: 9.7     median: 9.7 (2%)     max: 10 s
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
6700 +
min: 20.8     avg: 22.4     median: 22.4 (1%)     max: 24 s
20.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
6700 +
min: 490.8     avg: 537     median: 536.9 (2%)     max: 583 s
499.8 s (2%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 6700 +
155890 MIPS (74%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 6700 +
83810 MFLOPS (64%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 6700 +
min: 28021     avg: 28924     median: 28924 (22%)     max: 29827 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
6700 +
min: 8405     avg: 9780     median: 9832 (24%)     max: 10416 Points
11185 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
6700 +
min: 52447     avg: 54281     median: 54997 (45%)     max: 55398 Points
70546 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
70482 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
72413 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
6700 +
min: 7879     avg: 8131     median: 7952 (20%)     max: 8561 Points
8275 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
6700 +
min: 10918     avg: 11399     median: 11385 (20%)     max: 11819 Points
12616 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
6700 +
4535 Points (19%)
5777 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1139 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
5715 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1132 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5347 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
21830 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6700 +
min: 15038     avg: 15053     median: 15053 (27%)     max: 15068 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6700 +
min: 4022     avg: 4031     median: 4030.5 (79%)     max: 4039 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6700 +
15812 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6700 +
4233 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
6700 +
812 ms (1%)
867 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 6700 +
67.9 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 6700 +
44474 Points (34%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
211 Points (38%)
197 Points (35%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
131.6 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
122.5 Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
8 Points per Watt (6%)
19.5 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-6700 → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 113% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900T → 106% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 27. 12:33:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7101 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12027 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751020402s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:19:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7101 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 7101 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#11 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12027 +0.003s ... 0.026s

#13 got single benchmarks 12027 +0.003s ... 0.029s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.077s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.077s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)