Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-3920XM vs Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Celeron N5095

Intel Core i7-3920XM

► remove from comparison Intel 3920XM

The Intel Core i7-3920XM is the fastest quad-core processor for laptops based on the Ivy Bridge architecture at the time of introduction in April 2012. Due to Hyperthreading, the four cores can handle up to eight threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.9 GHz but can dynamically increase clock rates with Turbo Boost up to 3.6 GHz (for 4 active cores), 3.7 GHz (for 2 active cores) and 3.8 GHz (for 1 active core). Furthermore, the Extreme CPUs offer an unlocked multiplicator for easy overclocking.

Ivy Bridge is an enhanced die shrink of the Sandy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm (versus 32nm Sandy Bridge CPUs) and are the first to introduce 3D transistors for increased energy efficiency when compared to similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processors. Other new features are integrated PCI Express 3.0 and  DDR3(L)-1600 support.

The performance of the Core i7-3920XM is slightly (~5 %) above a similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processor due to slight architectural improvements. Therefore, and because of the higher clock speed, the former champion Core i7-2960XM is easily outperformed by 10 to 15%.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 offers 16 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 650 MHz up to 1300 MHz with Turbo Boost, making it the fastest variant.

The XM CPUs are rated at a TDP of 55 Watts including graphics card and memory controller and therefore 10 Watt higher than the other quad-core models.  Therefore, the CPU is well-suited for laptops 17-inches or greater.

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N5095

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095 and the N5095A is that the latter comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The average N5095 in our database is about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095 has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095 is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Core i7-3920XMIntel Celeron N4500Intel Celeron N5095
CodenameIvy BridgeJasper LakeJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Jasper LakeIntel Jasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core i7-3940XM3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3920XM « 2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3840QM2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3820QM2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3740QM2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3720QM2.6 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3635QM2.4 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3630QM2.4 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3615QM2.3 - 3.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3610QM2.3 - 3.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3632QM2.2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3612QM2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3540M3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3520M2.9 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3687U2.1 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3667U2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3537U2 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3517U1.9 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3689Y1.5 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock2900 - 3800 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 24 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP55 Watt6 Watt15 Watt
Transistors1400 Million
Technology22 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size160 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketFCPGA988BGA1338BGA1338
FeaturesHD Graphics 4000, DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4000 (650 - 1300 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$1096 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
16.6 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5095
20.6 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
709 Points (1%)
min: 2150     avg: 2174     median: 2164 (2%)     max: 2219 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
452 Points (19%)
min: 587     avg: 608     median: 611 (26%)     max: 621 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
188 Points (20%)
min: 228     avg: 234     median: 234 (25%)     max: 239 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
332 Points (1%)
min: 804     avg: 825     median: 827 (2%)     max: 844 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
171 Points (1%)
min: 221     avg: 343     median: 364 (2%)     max: 379 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
82 Points (23%)
min: 95.4     avg: 103.9     median: 106 (29%)     max: 109 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 6.89     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (9%)     max: 7.22 Points
2.1 Points (3%)
min: 4.65     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (6%)     max: 4.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.53     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (37%)     max: 1.58 Points
1 Points (25%)
min: 1.25     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (30%)     max: 1.29 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 3920XM +
min: 5045     avg: 5078     median: 5078 (31%)     max: 5111 Points
min: 3527     avg: 3545     median: 3544.5 (21%)     max: 3562 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 3920XM +
min: 19595     avg: 19653     median: 19652.5 (14%)     max: 19710 Points
min: 12218     avg: 12283     median: 12283 (9%)     max: 12348 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 19756     avg: 23050     median: 24647 (16%)     max: 24748 Points
6954 Points (4%)
min: 16442     avg: 16860     median: 16860 (11%)     max: 17278 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5132     avg: 6011     median: 6416 (8%)     max: 6484 Points
5266 Points (6%)
min: 5224     avg: 5338     median: 5337.5 (7%)     max: 5451 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 220.9     avg: 241.8     median: 241.8 (3%)     max: 262.7 s
1270 s (15%)
min: 605.375     avg: 611     median: 611.4 (7%)     max: 617.326 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 7.412     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.539 s
50.2 s (10%)
min: 19.202     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.779 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4570 Points (7%)
1076 Points (2%)
min: 1630     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (3%)     max: 1781 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
5394 MIPS (3%)
min: 10924     avg: 11024     median: 11013 (6%)     max: 11168 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2853 MIPS (34%)
min: 2935     avg: 3074     median: 3100 (37%)     max: 3124 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 37.1     avg: 38     median: 38 (13%)     max: 38.9 fps
12 fps (4%)
min: 24.75     avg: 25     median: 25 (8%)     max: 25.25 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 156.4     avg: 156.7     median: 156.7 (36%)     max: 157 fps
60.6 fps (14%)
min: 112.75     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (27%)     max: 120.25 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (4%)     max: 2.05 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.366     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (11%)     max: 0.373 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.562     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (10%)     max: 0.633 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.5     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (9%)     max: 3.6 GB/s
1.1 GB/s (3%)
2.5 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2936 Seconds (37%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4249 Seconds (30%)
min: 1502     avg: 1548     median: 1547 (11%)     max: 1624 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
2.1 sec (46%)
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (25%)     max: 1.2 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 6793     avg: 6935     median: 6973 (15%)     max: 7039 Points
2053 Points (4%)
min: 5266     avg: 5272     median: 5272 (11%)     max: 5278 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 9     avg: 9.4     median: 9 (2%)     max: 10.11 s
22.8 s (5%)
20.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 22     avg: 22.3     median: 22 (1%)     max: 22.98 s
51.4 s (2%)
45.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 531     avg: 534     median: 534 (2%)     max: 537 s
1132 s (5%)
1039 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 3920XM +
min: 115400     avg: 129935     median: 129935 (62%)     max: 144470 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 3920XM +
min: 83580     avg: 85345     median: 85345 (65%)     max: 87110 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 3920XM +
7.7 Points (99%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 3920XM +
min: 24085     avg: 24928     median: 25094 (19%)     max: 25605 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
9329 Points (23%)
1507 Points (4%)
min: 4224     avg: 4309     median: 4287 (11%)     max: 4439 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 41689     avg: 42092     median: 42091.5 (34%)     max: 42494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 41654     avg: 42066     median: 42065.5 (34%)     max: 42477 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 46730     avg: 47458     median: 47458 (39%)     max: 48186 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1521 Points (4%)
min: 3720     avg: 3823     median: 3846 (10%)     max: 3888 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2017 Points (4%)
min: 5400     avg: 5496     median: 5499 (10%)     max: 5572 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
504 Points (2%)
min: 1595     avg: 1649     median: 1656 (7%)     max: 1696 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 457     avg: 459.5     median: 459.5 (11%)     max: 462 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 662     avg: 710     median: 709.5 (3%)     max: 757 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (23%)     max: 598 Points
min: 637     avg: 649     median: 650.5 (25%)     max: 659 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 1933     avg: 2010     median: 2028 (4%)     max: 2052 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 628     avg: 644     median: 646.5 (3%)     max: 655 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1985     avg: 2029     median: 2030.5 (6%)     max: 2070 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2858     avg: 2896     median: 2900 (29%)     max: 2929 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7759     avg: 7856     median: 7842 (8%)     max: 7968 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
min: 1557     avg: 1578     median: 1571.5 (2%)     max: 1619 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24838 Points (19%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 91.2     avg: 99.6     median: 99.6 (27%)     max: 108 Points
min: 94.2     avg: 95.2     median: 95.2 (26%)     max: 96.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (17%)     max: 141.3 Points
min: 114.3     avg: 123.4     median: 125.3 (22%)     max: 127.2 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
2.3 MB/s (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
128.8 MB/s (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
91 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
2205 MB/s (61%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 6206     avg: 6520     median: 6519.5 (3%)     max: 6833 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 7404     avg: 7641     median: 7641 (28%)     max: 7878 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
381 Points (14%)
min: 473     avg: 486     median: 490 (18%)     max: 495 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.7 Watt (2%)
min: 24.1     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 24.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
9.1 Watt (2%)
min: 20.7     avg: 22     median: 22.1 (4%)     max: 23 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.06     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 5.49 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
min: 15.6     avg: 17     median: 17.2 (13%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-3920XM → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 36% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5095 → 60% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 14. 13:54:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3062 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13189 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752494051s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3062 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 3062 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.008s ... 0.027s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13189 +0.004s ... 0.031s

#13 got single benchmarks 13189 +0.008s ... 0.039s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.034s ... 0.073s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.092s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.092s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)