Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12700 vs Intel Core i9-10850K vs Intel Core i9-10910

Intel Core i7-12700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a fast eight-core desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in November 2021. The processor offers a base clock of 3.3 GHz and reaches up to 4.9 GHz in Turbo. In the same way, the Intel Core i7-12700K the Core i7-12700F is based on a hybrid architecture of 8P and 4E cores. The innovations of the Alder Lake-S processor compared to Rocket Lake, together with the smaller 10 nm manufacturing process, are clearly noticeable. The Intel Core i7-12700 does not offer a free multiplier, which means that overclocking is not possible.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-11700 , performance has been increased with a better IPC. The additional e-cores are also clearly noticeable in multi-threaded applications. Overall, this provides a noticeable performance boost, which also has an effect on all application areas. The 4 E-Cores provide the P-Cores with significantly more power. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0can increase the clock rate of the P-Cores to up to 4.9 GHz. The E-cores also offer a turbo and clock up to 3.6 GHz.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. However, with the Intel UHD Graphics 770 there is only a simple iGPU which is only suitable for office use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-12700 is 65 watts, with the option to consume up to 180 watts in Turbo mode. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be achieved permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

Intel Core i9-10850K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10850K

The Intel Core i9-10850K is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.2 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.8 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.2 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz). Compared to the fastest CML-S CPU, the Core i9-10900K, the 10850K clocks 100 MHz lower (base and Turbo clocks).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is a very fast gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

Intel Core i9-10910

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10910

The Intel Core i9-10910 is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.0 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.6 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.0 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

ModelIntel Core i7-12700Intel Core i9-10850KIntel Core i9-10910
CodenameAlder LakeComet Lake-SComet Lake-S
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-12900K3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-129002.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K « 3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-109103.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-101003.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 « 3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-101003.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz3600 - 5200 MHz3600 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB640 KB640 KB
L2 Cache12 MB2.5 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache25 MB20 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 2010 / 2010 / 20
TDP65 Watt125 Watt125 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm14 nm
Die Size215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 17001200LGA 1200
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 630
Architecturex86x86x86
$349 U.S.$453 U.S.$488 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.de
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700
41.2 pt (69%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10850K
35.1 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10910
34.3 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
21751 Points (20%)
15538 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1894 Points (80%)
1314 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
731 Points (80%)
511 Points (56%)
501 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8338 Points (20%)
5961 Points (15%)
5196 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3151 Points (20%)
2457 Points (16%)
2302 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
272 Points (75%)
215 Points (60%)
215 Points (60%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
36.9 Points (48%)
28.1 Points (36%)
25.6 Points (33%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (78%)
2.5 Points (58%)
2.4 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9171 Points (55%)
6829 Points (41%)
8131 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60892 Points (44%)
58453 Points (42%)
57842 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
103354 Points (66%)
76123 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15091 Points (18%)
6828 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
272.8 s (3%)
68.1 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.9 s (1%)
2.7 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
243.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.8 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9328 Points (15%)
9424 Points (15%)
8613 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
78331 MIPS (45%)
70932 MIPS (41%)
60747 MIPS (35%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6292 MIPS (74%)
5914 MIPS (70%)
5690 MIPS (67%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
172.4 fps (4%)
146.5 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
347 fps (9%)
285.5 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
25.5 fps (45%)
20.3 fps (36%)
16.8 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (44%)
1.5 GB/s (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.7 GB/s (47%)
2.5 GB/s (43%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.5 GB/s (38%)
14.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
242 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
151 Seconds (1%)
181.2 Seconds (1%)
208 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
0.5 sec (12%)
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15390 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
7.6 s (2%)
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
16.9 s (1%)
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
400.4 s (2%)
419.8 s (2%)
432.5 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
72464 Points (56%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
27022 Points (67%)
22639 Points (56%)
18348 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
86815 Points (71%)
72388 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
86587 Points (70%)
72353 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
96264 Points (77%)
73572 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
23193 Points (59%)
19764 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
34681 Points (62%)
28058 Points (50%)
25520 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
16400 Points (69%)
14278 Points (60%)
11771 Points (50%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2602 Points (65%)
1790 Points (45%)
1695 Points (42%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
13519 Points (52%)
9735 Points (38%)
8796 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1924 Points (75%)
1401 Points (55%)
1381 Points (54%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
14961 Points (27%)
11436 Points (20%)
10244 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1845 Points (8%)
1412 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14883 Points (47%)
11426 Points (36%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8059 Points (80%)
6425 Points (64%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
52676 Points (52%)
44146 Points (43%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
508 ms (1%)
717 ms (1%)
737 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
55976 Points (41%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
268 Points (74%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
314 Points (56%)
253 Points (45%)
236 Points (42%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2016 Points (75%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
327 Watt (56%)
302.2 Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
284 Watt (52%)
259.3 Watt (47%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
82.7 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
9.5 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10850K → 82% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10910 → 77% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 27. 18:56:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14995 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13162 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12832 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1758992190s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Sep 2025 05:17:37 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14995 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 14995 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13162 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 13162 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12832 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#13 got single benchmarks 12832 +0.004s ... 0.031s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.089s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.089s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)