Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-L16G7 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4980U

Intel Core i5-L16G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-L16G7

The Core i5-L16G7 is an SoC with 5 processor cores based on the Lakefield architecture. It uses one fast Sunny Cove core (known from Ice-Lake CPUs but without AVX512) with up to 3 GHz and 4 small Tremont cores (Atom / Celeron) with up to 2.8 GHz. Using all 5 cores, the CPU can reach up to 1.8 GHz, base clock speed is 1.4 GHz. The CPU does not support HyperThreading / SMT. The rest of the SoC is similar to the Ice Lake chips, like the Gen 11 graphics card with 64 EUs (similar to the Iris Plus G7 but only clocked at 500 MHz and using the UHD Graphics name).

Performance

The average L16G7 in our database is in the same league as the Pentium N6000 and also the Core i3-1110G4, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This kind of performance is only sufficient for basic day-to-day activities as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the CPU power limits are.

With a specified TDP of 7 Watt (PL1, 9.5 Watt PL2), the CPU is well suited for thin and light laptops and Windows based tablets. / 2-in-1. Intel claims that the standby power was greatly reduced (91% better compared to the i7-8500Y with 2.5 mW). The SoC is manufactured in 10nm and uses the Intel Foveros 3D Packaging technology. Foveros is used to stack the in 22FFL manufactured I/O die, the compute die in 10nm and up to 8 GB LPDDR4X-4267.

AMD Ryzen 7 4980U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4980U

The AMD Ryzen 7 4980U is a Renoir family processor designed for certain Microsoft Surface systems. 4980U has eight Zen 2 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz (base clock speed) to 4.4 GHz (Boost) with thread-doubling SMT tech enabled for a total of 16 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to that AMD promises a 2x improvement in performance-per-Watt over Ryzen 3000 series mobile CPUs.

Architecture

The Zen 2 microarchitecture has brought a sizeable per-thread performance boost compared to the outgoing Zen+ parts. Renoir product family is also the first to introduce 8-core ULV processors to laptop market, keeping power consumption within reasonable limits. This AMD processor family is very impressive from most perspectives. One of the disatvantages to keep in mind is the lack of PCI-Express 4 support, meaning these blazing-fast NVMe SSDs will be limited to 3.9 GB/s tops.

Ryzen 7 4980U is designed to work with quad-channel LPDDR4 memory at up to 4,267 MHz. 8 MB of Level 3 are present in this chip. The Ryzen 7 gets soldered straight to the motherboard (FP6 socket) and is thus not user-replaceable. Please go to our Renoir hub page for more information on the product family.

Performance

The 4980U is the fastest U-class Ryzen 4000 series chip. As such, its clock speeds are 200 MHz higher (both the base one and Boost one) than what the Ryzen 7 4800U has.

It is thus hardly surprising that the average 4980U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 5800U and also the Core i7-1260P, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Graphics

In addition to its eight CPU cores, the Ryzen 7 also features the Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics adapter with 8 CUs (= 512 shaders) at up to 1,950 MHz. This iGPU is compatible with FreeSync and DirectX 12 and is able to HW-decode AVC, HEVC, VP9-encoded videos (no AV1 support here). Vega 8 is capable of outputting UHD 2160p60 video signal to several monitors and, similar to Intel's Iris Xe (80 EUs), is good enough for a bit of light gaming on the go, provided one is content with sub-1080p resolutions and low/medium quailty presets.

Power consumption

The APU has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W; much like it is with other U-class Ryzen 4000 chips, AMD is fine with laptop makers (Microsoft, in this case) changing that value to anything between 10 W and 25 W.

The 7 nm TSMC process this Ryzen 7 is built with makes for above average, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-L16G7AMD Ryzen 7 4980U
SeriesIntel LakefieldAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
CodenameLakefieldRenoir-U (Zen 2)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Intel Core i5-L16G7 « 1.4 - 3 GHz5 / 5 cores
Intel Core i3-L13G4 compare0.8 - 2.8 GHz5 / 5 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U « 2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U compare1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U compare2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U compare2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1400 - 3000 MHz2000 - 4400 MHz
Cores / Threads5 / 58 / 16
TDP7 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketCSP1016FP6
FeaturesLPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHALPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) (200 - 500 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$281 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB
L3 Cache8 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-L16G7
21.1 pt (29%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4980U
33.6 pt (47%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1810 Points (2%)
9164 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
710 Points (30%)
1260 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 276     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (31%)     max: 289 Points
492 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 609     avg: 648     median: 647.5 (2%)     max: 686 Points
3453 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
255 Points (2%)
1658 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 88.3     avg: 89.5     median: 89.5 (27%)     max: 90.7 Points
182 Points (55%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.2 Points (4%)
18.9 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (35%)
2.2 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4079 Points (25%)
5715 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9003 Points (7%)
35106 Points (25%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
879 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
28.6 s (6%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
236.1 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.4 s (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 7230     avg: 7587     median: 7586.5 (4%)     max: 7943 MIPS
42368 MIPS (24%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3174     avg: 3211     median: 3211 (38%)     max: 3248 MIPS
4320 MIPS (52%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.44     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (3%)     max: 1.48 fps
9.8 fps (17%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1897     avg: 2027     median: 2026.5 (14%)     max: 2156 Seconds
342 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.897     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (20%)     max: 0.987 sec
0.6 sec (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.7 s (3%)
9.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.9 s (1%)
24.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
622 s (3%)
758 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2926     avg: 3015     median: 3015 (8%)     max: 3104 Points
11759 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
26353 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
26635 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
32705 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2831     avg: 2834     median: 2834 (7%)     max: 2837 Points
10152 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 4138     avg: 4306     median: 4305.5 (8%)     max: 4473 Points
18654 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1148 Points (5%)
5917 Points (25%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 797     avg: 827     median: 826.5 (35%)     max: 856 Points
1133 Points (48%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1441     avg: 1634     median: 1633.5 (3%)     max: 1826 Points
7156 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1252     avg: 1278     median: 1277.5 (1%)     max: 1303 ms
811 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 31228     avg: 32455     median: 32455 (29%)     max: 33682 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 121     avg: 124.5     median: 124.5 (26%)     max: 128 Points
210 Points (44%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-L16G7 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4980U → 306% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 28. 21:28:48

#0 checking url part for id 12215 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13176 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:33:54 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12215 +0.017s ... 0.048s

#7 got single benchmarks 12215 +0.011s ... 0.059s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13176 +0.015s ... 0.074s

#9 got single benchmarks 13176 +0.008s ... 0.082s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.173s ... 0.255s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.28s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)