Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-7267U vs AMD A12-9700P vs AMD A10-9620P

Intel Core i5-7267U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-7267U is a fast dual-core SoC for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. The CPU has two processor cores clocked at 3.1-3.5 GHz (two cores also up to 3.5 GHz). The processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper Threading. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 GPU with 64 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the 28-Watt CPU should be on par with the Core i7-7500U (2.7-3.5 GHz, no eDRAM, 15 Watts), but it should be a bit slower on practice due to the missing level 4 eDRAM and the lower TDP. This means the i5 is still one of the faster dual-core processors and should be sufficient for most scenarios. Some games might still require a real quad-core processor and therefore nit run perfectly on the dual-core processor, despite Hyper Threading.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 650 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 920MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Pro 550, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for dual-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

AMD A12-9700P

► remove from comparison AMD A12-9700P

The AMD A12-9700P is a mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The ULV chip with a TDP of 15 Watts (can be configured to 12 Watts) has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The performance of the A12-9700P is between the two 15-Watt processors A10-9600P and FX-9800P, and therefore roughly on par with a 15-Watt Core i3 from the Skylake or Kaby Lake series, respectively. Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores. Due to the TDP limitation, the performance of the A12-9700P will drop significantly under sustained workloads.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9700P with 15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

AMD A10-9620P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-9620P

The AMD A10-9620P is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.5 - 3.4 GHz. In our tests the A10-9620P even hit 3.6 GHz.

It was announced in 2017 and is based on the same silicon as Carrizo but with more and refined features. It is a ULV-chip with a TDP of 15 Watt and integrates a Radeon R5 graphics card (384 shader cores / 6 compute cores) and a dual-channel DDR4-18600 memory controller. As Carrizo its a full featured SoC that offers all I/O ports on the chip.

The A10-9620P is a bit faster than the old 15-Watt top model of Carrizo, the FX-8800P. See our Bristol Ridge article for more information on the architecture and improvements compared to Carrizo.

ModelIntel Core i5-7267UAMD A12-9700PAMD A10-9620P
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameKaby LakeBristol RidgeBristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
Intel Core i7-7700K4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-77003.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v63.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v63 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-75003.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U « 3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y751.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y571.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y541.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y321 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y301 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P « 2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P « 2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock3100 - 3500 MHz2500 - 3400 MHz2500 - 3400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP28 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm28 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1356FP4FP4
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (300 - 1050 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$304 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comproducts.amd.com
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million
Die Size250 mm2250 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
383 Points (2%)
min: 222     avg: 225.5     median: 225.5 (1%)     max: 229 Points
230 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
141 Points (42%)
min: 78     avg: 79     median: 79 (24%)     max: 80 Points
72 Points (22%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4.1 Points (5%)
min: 1.92     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.62 Points
2.7 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.5 Points (38%)
min: 0.76     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (21%)     max: 0.94 Points
0.8 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5010 Points (30%)
min: 2262     avg: 2429     median: 2429 (15%)     max: 2596 Points
2277 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
11403 Points (8%)
min: 5148     avg: 6168     median: 6168 (4%)     max: 7188 Points
7420 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
492 s (6%)
470.9 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.6 s (3%)
14.4 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3243 Points (5%)
1462 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
21.9 fps (8%)
16.7 fps (6%)
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
119.4 fps (28%)
84.6 fps (20%)
76.6 fps (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (5%)
1.8 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4378 Points (9%)
min: 3344     avg: 3498     median: 3498 (7%)     max: 3652 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.1 s (3%)
19.2 s (4%)
18.2 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.7 s (1%)
42.1 s (2%)
40.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
626 s (3%)
980 s (4%)
977 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
7608 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4896 Points (13%)
min: 2524     avg: 2527     median: 2527 (7%)     max: 2530 Points
2399 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
25886 Points (21%)
22553 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
25743 Points (21%)
24032 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
44493 Points (37%)
27373 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3712 Points (9%)
min: 2283     avg: 2306     median: 2306 (6%)     max: 2329 Points
2338 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5169 Points (9%)
min: 2981     avg: 3125     median: 3124.5 (6%)     max: 3268 Points
3175 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2044 Points (9%)
1069 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3972     avg: 4182     median: 4181.5 (42%)     max: 4391 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8084     avg: 8706     median: 8706 (10%)     max: 9328 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2158 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4899 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5371     avg: 5464     median: 5464 (10%)     max: 5557 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 2062     avg: 2091     median: 2091 (41%)     max: 2120 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5824 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2308 Points (35%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
820 ms (1%)
2059 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
110.3 ms (1%)
164.9 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
38960 Points (35%)
19404 Points (17%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
42.8 Watt (7%)
31.9 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.5 Watt (5%)
33.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
13 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7267U → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks AMD A12-9700P → 66% n=15

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-9620P → 66% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 02. 09:25:45

#0 checking url part for id 8454 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8166 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9188 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.045s ... 0.047s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8454 +0.003s ... 0.05s

#8 got single benchmarks 8454 +0.012s ... 0.062s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8166 +0.003s ... 0.065s

#10 got single benchmarks 8166 +0.019s ... 0.084s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9188 +0.003s ... 0.087s

#12 got single benchmarks 9188 +0.012s ... 0.098s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.098s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.408s ... 0.506s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.506s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)