, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD A12-9700P vs AMD A10-9620P

AMD A12-9700P

► remove from comparison AMD A12-9700P

The AMD A12-9700P is a mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The ULV chip with a TDP of 15 Watts (can be configured to 12 Watts) has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The performance of the A12-9700P is between the two 15-Watt processors A10-9600P and FX-9800P, and therefore roughly on par with a 15-Watt Core i3 from the Skylake or Kaby Lake series, respectively. Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores. Due to the TDP limitation, the performance of the A12-9700P will drop significantly under sustained workloads.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9700P with 15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

AMD A10-9620P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-9620P

The AMD A10-9620P is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.5 - 3.4 GHz. In our tests the A10-9620P even hit 3.6 GHz.

It was announced in 2017 and is based on the same silicon as Carrizo but with more and refined features. It is a ULV-chip with a TDP of 15 Watt and integrates a Radeon R5 graphics card (384 shader cores / 6 compute cores) and a dual-channel DDR4-18600 memory controller. As Carrizo its a full featured SoC that offers all I/O ports on the chip.

The A10-9620P is a bit faster than the old 15-Watt top model of Carrizo, the FX-8800P. See our Bristol Ridge article for more information on the architecture and improvements compared to Carrizo.

AMD A12-9700PAMD A10-9620P
AMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
Bristol RidgeBristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-9830P compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9720P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9600P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9830P compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9720P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9600P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
2500 - 3400 MHz2500 - 3400 MHz
2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 4
15 15
3100 3100
28 28
250 mm2250 mm2
90 °C90 °C
FP4FP4
Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
AMD Bristol Ridge A12-9700P

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 222     avg: 226     median: 225.5 (2%)     max: 229 Points
230 Points (2%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225233.24219.84217.43216.94216.33215.78215.4214.27217.16214.43213.58215.31216.73216.38216.35216.51216.26215.75216.13217.14215.46217.36216.2215.93216.86215.96216.27216.37216.11216.06216.27216.49215.47215.38214.32216.82216.95215.62215.87215.89216.39216.7214.39217.47215.18216.11Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 78     avg: 79     median: 79 (29%)     max: 80 Points
72 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.92     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (4%)     max: 2.62 Points
2.7 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.76     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (27%)     max: 0.94 Points
0.8 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2262     avg: 2429     median: 2429 (22%)     max: 2596
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5148     avg: 6168     median: 6168 (10%)     max: 7188
7420 (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
471 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14.4 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1462 (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
16.7 fps (8%)
16.3 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
84.6 fps (25%)
76.6 fps (23%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3344     avg: 3498     median: 3498 (19%)     max: 3652 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
19.2 s (4%)
18.2 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
42.1 s (2%)
40.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
980 s (4%)
977 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
7608 Points (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2524     avg: 2527     median: 2527 (9%)     max: 2530 Points
2399 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
25886 Points (17%)
22553 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
25743 Points (27%)
24032 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
27373 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2283     avg: 2306     median: 2306 (6%)     max: 2329 Points
2338 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2981     avg: 3125     median: 3124.5 (8%)     max: 3268 Points
3175 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1069 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5371     avg: 5464     median: 5464 (10%)     max: 5557
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 2062     avg: 2091     median: 2091 (43%)     max: 2120
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5824 (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2308 (47%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2158 (33%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4899 (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2059 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
165 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
19404 Points (28%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
31.9 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
33.3 Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A12-9700P → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-9620P → 99% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 25. 02:54:08

#0 checking url part for id 8166 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9188 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.011s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8166 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#7 got single benchmarks 8166 +0.01s ... 0.021s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9188 +0.001s ... 0.022s

#9 got single benchmarks 9188 +0.008s ... 0.029s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.051s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)