Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1335U vs Intel Core i5-11320H

Intel Core i5-1335U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1335U

The Intel Core i5-1335U is a mid-range mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-U / RPL-U series). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 2  performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.3 to 4.6 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.9 to 3.4 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports only "Essentials" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

Thanks to the similar clock speed, the Core i5-1335U is very similar to the older Core i7-1250U (+100 MHz P-Cores base clock rate). The faster i7 like the i7-1365U models offer only higher clock rates (and a faster iGPU).

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-6400. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU still only supports PCIe 4.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i5 CPU is rated at a TDP of 15W (base power, PL1) and a maximum turbo power of 55W (PL2). The RPL-U processors are built in a further improved Intel 7 process (10nm SuperFin) that allows higher clock rates.

Intel Core i5-11320H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11320H

The Intel Core i5-11320H is a mid range SoC for thin and light gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H35 refresh generation and will be announced in Q3 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and can vary from 2.5 (28 W TDP) to 3.2 GHz (35 W). The boost of a single and two cores under load can reach up to 4.5 GHz. All four cores can reach up to 4.3 GHz. The L3 cache is reduced to 8 MB compared to the 12 MB of the higher end i7 models.

Thanks to the improved clock speeds, the performance gap to the faster i7-11370H should be quite small. The i7 still offers higher single and dual core Turbo speeds and more L3 cache.

The SoC also included the improved Xe graphics card with 96 CUs clocked at up to 1350 MHz.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm process (called 10nm SuperFin) at Intel, which should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

 

ModelIntel Core i5-1335UIntel Core i5-11320H
CodenameRaptor Lake-UTiger Lake-H35
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-UIntel Tiger Lake
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-H35
Intel Core i7-1365U compare1.3 - 5.2 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1355U compare1.2 - 5 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1345U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1335U « 0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1334U compare0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1315U compare0.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1305U compare1.2 - 4.5 GHz5 / 6 cores10 MB L3
Intel Processor U300 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11390H compare3.4 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11375H compare3.3 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11370H compare3.3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11320H « 3.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11300H compare3.1 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock900 - 4600 MHz3200 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache928 KB320 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 124 / 8
TDP15 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1700BGA1449
FeaturesThread DirectorDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1250 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1335U
34.8 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11320H
32.1 pt (53%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6957     avg: 8383     median: 8889.5 (8%)     max: 9438 Points
min: 5720     avg: 5869     median: 5852 (5%)     max: 6051 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1532     avg: 1669     median: 1684.5 (71%)     max: 1733 Points
min: 1341     avg: 1432     median: 1460.5 (61%)     max: 1467 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 593     avg: 636     median: 643 (70%)     max: 663 Points
min: 557     avg: 561     median: 560.5 (61%)     max: 567 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2602     avg: 3257     median: 3343 (8%)     max: 3849 Points
min: 2208     avg: 2273     median: 2267.5 (6%)     max: 2349 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1109     avg: 1411     median: 1464 (9%)     max: 1547 Points
min: 857     avg: 922     median: 905.5 (6%)     max: 1019 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 222     avg: 236.5     median: 238 (66%)     max: 248 Points
min: 212     avg: 213.8     median: 214 (59%)     max: 215 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.9 Points (25%)
10.8 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3 Points (71%)
2.5 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9351 Points (56%)
8767 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40266 Points (29%)
32576 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
62930 Points (40%)
42350 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13680 Points (17%)
11457 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
508 s (6%)
191.4 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8 s (2%)
5.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5178 Points (8%)
5481 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 25012     avg: 33576     median: 34186 (20%)     max: 38513 MIPS
min: 24718     avg: 25274     median: 24760 (14%)     max: 26858 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4872     avg: 5202     median: 5171 (61%)     max: 5545 MIPS
min: 4813     avg: 4996     median: 5025 (59%)     max: 5119 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81.8 fps (27%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
257 fps (59%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.55     avg: 9     median: 9.2 (16%)     max: 10.7 fps
min: 7.25     avg: 7.6     median: 7.6 (13%)     max: 7.91 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (26%)
0.5 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
0.9 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.5 GB/s (25%)
6.1 GB/s (16%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 646     avg: 807     median: 804 (10%)     max: 1100 Seconds
min: 937     avg: 981     median: 995 (13%)     max: 1010 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 340     avg: 460.4     median: 409 (3%)     max: 786 Seconds
min: 507     avg: 527     median: 528.5 (4%)     max: 543 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4892     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.524 sec
min: 0.581     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.622 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12286 Points (26%)
10886 Points (23%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.3 s (1%)
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
423.1 s (2%)
389.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
33603 Points (26%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8341     avg: 12167     median: 12727 (31%)     max: 15080 Points
min: 10666     avg: 11575     median: 11487 (28%)     max: 12778 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 66612     avg: 66703     median: 66702.5 (54%)     max: 66793 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 66629     avg: 67222     median: 67221.5 (55%)     max: 67814 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 70639     avg: 70683     median: 70683 (59%)     max: 70727 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6734     avg: 10580     median: 11760 (30%)     max: 12730 Points
min: 8860     avg: 9380     median: 9363 (24%)     max: 10187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9926     avg: 16238     median: 17566 (31%)     max: 19968 Points
min: 13123     avg: 13891     median: 13763 (25%)     max: 14950 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4040     avg: 5523     median: 5589 (24%)     max: 6757 Points
min: 4803     avg: 5132     median: 5199 (22%)     max: 5637 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2236     avg: 2295     median: 2260 (56%)     max: 2379 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 6604     avg: 8168     median: 8597 (33%)     max: 9282 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2166     avg: 2203     median: 2203 (70%)     max: 2240 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 8419     avg: 8429     median: 8428.5 (35%)     max: 8438 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1506     avg: 1639     median: 1669 (65%)     max: 1700 Points
min: 1453     avg: 1497     median: 1505 (59%)     max: 1523 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5459     avg: 7429     median: 7856 (14%)     max: 8618 Points
min: 4927     avg: 5375     median: 5308 (10%)     max: 5955 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1637     avg: 1642     median: 1641.5 (7%)     max: 1646 Points
min: 1453     avg: 1488     median: 1493.5 (6%)     max: 1510 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7984     avg: 8225     median: 8225 (26%)     max: 8466 Points
min: 4864     avg: 5318     median: 5259 (17%)     max: 5890 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7007 Points (70%)
6238 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
30532 Points (30%)
22045 Points (22%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 545     avg: 671     median: 558 (1%)     max: 1914 ms
min: 662     avg: 669     median: 666.5 (1%)     max: 680 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
64.5 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 71882     avg: 81575     median: 84497 (64%)     max: 85424 Points
67714 Points (51%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 195.6     avg: 227.5     median: 231 (63%)     max: 238 Points
min: 202     avg: 204.7     median: 206 (57%)     max: 206 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 212     avg: 255.3     median: 260 (47%)     max: 270 Points
min: 243     avg: 258.3     median: 260.5 (47%)     max: 269 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1339     avg: 1442     median: 1450 (54%)     max: 1599 Points
min: 1300     avg: 1331     median: 1326 (50%)     max: 1371 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 26.2     avg: 36.7     median: 36 (6%)     max: 56.7 Watt
min: 52.5     avg: 54.2     median: 52.8 (9%)     max: 58.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 29.6     avg: 44     median: 41.7 (8%)     max: 62.8 Watt
min: 47.3     avg: 53.5     median: 51 (9%)     max: 64.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.03     avg: 6.6     median: 5.9 (4%)     max: 12.7 Watt
min: 8.12     avg: 8.1     median: 8.1 (5%)     max: 8.16 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.5     avg: 6.3     median: 6 (7%)     max: 9.71 Watt
6.4 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 24.3     avg: 41.6     median: 43.1 (32%)     max: 57.5 Points per Watt
min: 15.8     avg: 17.4     median: 17.3 (13%)     max: 19.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1335U → 100% n=43

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11320H → 87% n=43

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 31. 13:41:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14916 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13169 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753962114s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 31 Jul 2025 05:18:39 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14916 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14916 +0.02s ... 0.029s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13169 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#10 got single benchmarks 13169 +0.008s ... 0.041s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.088s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.091s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)