Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1145G7 vs Intel Core i3-8109U

Intel Core i5-1145G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1145G7

The Intel Core i5-1145G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced early 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP settings and ranges from 1.1 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.6 GHz (28 Watt). The Boost is always specified at 4.4 GHz (one or two cores).

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card with 80 EUs based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It offers a significantly higher performance compared to the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake).

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (4 lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wifi 6 in the chip. In addition to this, the i5 supports vPro for easy remote management.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Intel Core i3-8109U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-8109U is a dual-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in April 2018. Compared to its predecessor Core i3-7167U, the CPU now supports Turbo boost with up to 3.6 GHz. Thanks to Hyperthreading the CPU can execute up to 4 threads simultaneously. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM (but with 300 - 1050 MHz it is the slowest Iris Plus), a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm++ process (3rd generation) with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Thanks to the Turbo Boost, the processor performance should be a bit above the old Core i7-7500U (max. 3.5 GHz, 15 Watt). Therefore the Core i3-8109U should be fine for most applications. Some games however already need four real cores for optimal performance (paired with a dedicated GPU e.g.).

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz  and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process (14nm++, 3rd generation of 14nm) with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for quad-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

ModelIntel Core i5-1145G7Intel Core i3-8109U
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Coffee Lake-U
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-U
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8559U compare2.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8557U compare1.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8269U compare2.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8279U compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8259U compare2.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8257U compare1.4 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8109U « 3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2600 - 4400 MHz3000 - 3600 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB128 KB
L2 Cache5 MB512 KB
L3 Cache8 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 4
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1449FCBGA1528
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TMEDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1300 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (300 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1145G7
32.8 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-8109U
25.1 pt (35%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4769     avg: 4880     median: 4880 (5%)     max: 4991 Points
2004 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1361     avg: 1375     median: 1374.5 (58%)     max: 1388 Points
906 Points (39%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
531 Points (59%)
351 Points (39%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1693     avg: 1842     median: 1841.5 (4%)     max: 1990 Points
772 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 791     avg: 792     median: 791.5 (5%)     max: 792 Points
min: 324     avg: 352.5     median: 352.5 (2%)     max: 381 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 202     avg: 202.5     median: 202.5 (61%)     max: 203 Points
min: 124.3     avg: 138.7     median: 138.7 (42%)     max: 153 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.12     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (12%)     max: 9.41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.26     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (57%)     max: 2.36 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8225     avg: 8275     median: 8274.5 (50%)     max: 8324 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 25475     avg: 25545     median: 25545 (19%)     max: 25615 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 33427     avg: 34400     median: 34399.5 (24%)     max: 35372 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 10472     avg: 10648     median: 10648 (13%)     max: 10824 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 227.285     avg: 281.1     median: 281.1 (3%)     max: 335 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.499     avg: 8.4     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 10.2 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4190     avg: 4707     median: 4706.5 (7%)     max: 5223 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 20565     avg: 21844     median: 21844 (13%)     max: 23123 MIPS
9489 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4751     avg: 4802     median: 4802 (57%)     max: 4853 MIPS
3752 MIPS (45%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
46.3 fps (16%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
192 fps (44%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.46     avg: 6     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.6 fps
2.9 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.437     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.469 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.713     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.802 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.6 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1116 Seconds (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 601     avg: 641     median: 641 (5%)     max: 681 Seconds
1328 Seconds (9%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.627     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.63 sec
0.9 sec (19%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 8786     avg: 8923     median: 8922.5 (19%)     max: 9059 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.825 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.7     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 17.298 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 366     avg: 389.8     median: 389.8 (2%)     max: 413.691 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
30874 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10880     avg: 11208     median: 11208 (30%)     max: 11536 Points
4921 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63423 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63591 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
65828 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8524     avg: 8726     median: 8725.5 (22%)     max: 8927 Points
3604 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13209     avg: 13311     median: 13311 (24%)     max: 13413 Points
5138 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4092     avg: 4290     median: 4289.5 (18%)     max: 4487 Points
min: 1932     avg: 2134     median: 2134 (9%)     max: 2336 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1427     avg: 1429     median: 1428.5 (60%)     max: 1430 Points
888 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5055     avg: 5261     median: 5261 (9%)     max: 5467 Points
1880 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1423 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5351 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6226 Points (62%)
4540 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
20787 Points (23%)
8974 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 702     avg: 712     median: 712 (1%)     max: 722 ms
1199 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
177.4 Points (51%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 234     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (50%)     max: 243 Points
131.3 Points (27%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1279     avg: 1285     median: 1284.5 (49%)     max: 1290 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38     avg: 42.8     median: 42.8 (7%)     max: 47.5 Watt
35.9 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.2     avg: 50.4     median: 50.4 (9%)     max: 55.5 Watt
32.4 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.9 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17.5 Points per Watt (13%)
10 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1145G7 → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-8109U → 58% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 12. 11:52:40

#0 checking url part for id 12236 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10066 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:38:24 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12236 +0.019s ... 0.04s

#7 got single benchmarks 12236 +0.017s ... 0.057s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10066 +0.017s ... 0.074s

#9 got single benchmarks 10066 +0.006s ... 0.08s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.247s ... 0.328s

#12 return log +0.047s ... 0.375s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)