Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1145G7 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165H

Intel Core i5-1145G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1145G7

The Intel Core i5-1145G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced early 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP settings and ranges from 1.1 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.6 GHz (28 Watt). The Boost is always specified at 4.4 GHz (one or two cores).

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card with 80 EUs based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It offers a significantly higher performance compared to the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake).

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (4 lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wifi 6 in the chip. In addition to this, the i5 supports vPro for easy remote management.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Intel Core Ultra 7 165H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 165H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. The 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 5.0 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz. Two of the 10 E-cores are located in the Low Power Island.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 165H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 165H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 165H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 165H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core i5-1145G7Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Meteor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H « 3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock2600 - 4400 MHz3800 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB
L2 Cache5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 816 / 22
6 x 5.0 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C
SocketBGA1449BGA2049
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1300 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1145G7
30.8 pt (51%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 165H
37.6 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103.3 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 616     avg: 690     median: 690 (13%)     max: 764 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4769     avg: 4880     median: 4880 (5%)     max: 4991 Points
min: 14055     avg: 14783     median: 14551 (14%)     max: 15743 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1361     avg: 1375     median: 1374.5 (58%)     max: 1388 Points
min: 1668     avg: 1731     median: 1759 (74%)     max: 1766 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
531 Points (58%)
min: 674     avg: 681     median: 683 (74%)     max: 687 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1693     avg: 1842     median: 1841.5 (4%)     max: 1990 Points
min: 5471     avg: 5640     median: 5545 (14%)     max: 5904 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 791     avg: 792     median: 791.5 (5%)     max: 792 Points
min: 2467     avg: 2583     median: 2641 (17%)     max: 2642 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 202     avg: 202.5     median: 202.5 (56%)     max: 203 Points
min: 257     avg: 258     median: 257 (71%)     max: 260 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.12     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (12%)     max: 9.41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.26     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (55%)     max: 2.36 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8225     avg: 8275     median: 8274.5 (50%)     max: 8324 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 25475     avg: 25545     median: 25545 (19%)     max: 25615 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 33427     avg: 34400     median: 34399.5 (22%)     max: 35372 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 10472     avg: 10648     median: 10648 (13%)     max: 10824 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 227.285     avg: 281.1     median: 281.1 (3%)     max: 335 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.499     avg: 8.4     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 10.2 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4190     avg: 4707     median: 4706.5 (7%)     max: 5223 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 20565     avg: 21844     median: 21844 (13%)     max: 23123 MIPS
min: 54741     avg: 58029     median: 56997 (33%)     max: 62349 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4751     avg: 4802     median: 4802 (57%)     max: 4853 MIPS
min: 4939     avg: 5200     median: 5273 (62%)     max: 5387 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
46.3 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
192 fps (5%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.46     avg: 6     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.6 fps
min: 14.4     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (27%)     max: 16 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.437     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.469 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.713     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.802 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.6 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1116 Seconds (14%)
min: 406     avg: 435     median: 435 (6%)     max: 464 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 601     avg: 641     median: 641 (5%)     max: 681 Seconds
min: 231     avg: 246     median: 246 (2%)     max: 261 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.627     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.63 sec
min: 0.4565     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4686 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 8786     avg: 8923     median: 8922.5 (19%)     max: 9059 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.825 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.7     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 17.298 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 366     avg: 389.8     median: 389.8 (2%)     max: 413.691 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
30874 Points (24%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10880     avg: 11208     median: 11208 (28%)     max: 11536 Points
min: 18101     avg: 20276     median: 20275.5 (50%)     max: 22450 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63423 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63591 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
65828 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8524     avg: 8726     median: 8725.5 (22%)     max: 8927 Points
min: 13733     avg: 14430     median: 14429.5 (37%)     max: 15126 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13209     avg: 13311     median: 13311 (24%)     max: 13413 Points
min: 23240     avg: 23582     median: 23582 (42%)     max: 23924 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4092     avg: 4290     median: 4289.5 (18%)     max: 4487 Points
min: 7617     avg: 8260     median: 8259.5 (35%)     max: 8902 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1906 Points (48%)
min: 2358     avg: 2429     median: 2421.5 (60%)     max: 2513 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
6154 Points (24%)
min: 11616     avg: 12341     median: 12230.5 (47%)     max: 13288 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1427     avg: 1429     median: 1428.5 (54%)     max: 1430 Points
min: 1688     avg: 1782     median: 1793.5 (68%)     max: 1853 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5055     avg: 5261     median: 5261 (9%)     max: 5467 Points
min: 11733     avg: 12010     median: 12051.5 (22%)     max: 12204 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1423 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5351 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6226 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
20787 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 702     avg: 712     median: 712 (1%)     max: 722 ms
min: 514     avg: 518     median: 517.5 (1%)     max: 521 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
177.4 Points (49%)
min: 259     avg: 263     median: 263 (72%)     max: 267 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 234     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (43%)     max: 243 Points
min: 291     avg: 293     median: 293 (53%)     max: 295 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1279     avg: 1285     median: 1284.5 (48%)     max: 1290 Points
min: 1690     avg: 1751     median: 1692 (63%)     max: 1872 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38     avg: 42.8     median: 42.8 (7%)     max: 47.5 Watt
min: 55.7     avg: 58.2     median: 58.2 (10%)     max: 60.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.2     avg: 50.4     median: 50.4 (9%)     max: 55.5 Watt
min: 64.8     avg: 79.7     median: 79.7 (15%)     max: 94.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.9 Watt (7%)
min: 2.51     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (3%)     max: 6.73 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (4%)
min: 3.01     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (6%)     max: 7.51 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
17.5 Points per Watt (13%)
min: 27.9     avg: 33     median: 33 (25%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1145G7 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 165H → 191% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 01. 01:42:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12236 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16905 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759275736s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:06:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12236 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 12236 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16905 +0.005s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 16905 +0.008s ... 0.031s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.027s ... 0.058s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.059s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.071s

#15 return log +0.003s ... 0.074s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)