Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1035G7 vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

Intel Core i5-1035G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1035G7

The Intel Core i5-1035G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Ice -Lake-U generation that was announced in Mai 2019 (Computex). It integrates four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading) clocked at 1.2 (base) - 3.7 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.6 GHz and all four 3.3 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock). The Core i5-1035G7 is the second fastest Ice Lake-U chip at the time of announcement in 2019.

The biggest improvement for Ice-Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics adapter called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 CUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU in current Ryzen APUs.

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4-3733).

Performance

The average 1035G7 in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 3 4300U and the Core i5-10210U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which isn't bad at all as of late 2021. The Core i5-1035G4 and the Core i5-1035G1 are two other chips that nearly match the 1035G7 in multi-thread performance.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 22 W, the Surface Laptop 3 13 is among the fastest laptops built around the 1035G7 that we know of. It can be at least 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 25 W if required with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. Those values are a little too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The processor is built with Intel's second-gen 10 nm process for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 4900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.3 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips

According to our information, the Ryzen 9 4900HS is only slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 4800HS. The CPU is clocked 100 MHz (base and boost) higher, but the gains greatly depend on the cooling and TDP settings. Compared to Intel chips, the i9-9980HK top model should be comparable. That means the Ryzen 9 4900HS should be able to handle all demanding tasks and gaming. Compared to the similar named 45W-version, the Ryzen 9 4900H, the 4900HS is differs in 100 MHz boost and 300 MHz base clock.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics card with most likely 7 CUs. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 35 Watt (default). That means the chip is intended for big and relatively heavy laptops. The Ryzen 7 4900HS is the 35 Watt version of the R9 4900H with a 10 Watt lower TDP.

ModelIntel Core i5-1035G7AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
SeriesIntel Ice LakeAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
CodenameIce Lake-URenoir (Zen 2)
Series: Ice Lake Ice Lake-U
Intel Core i5-1038NG7 compare2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G7 compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G7 « 1.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G4 compare1.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G1 compare1 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G1 compare1.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1200 - 3700 MHz3000 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache6 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 16
TDP15 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1526FP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1050 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1035G7
29.1 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900HS
35.2 pt (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 380     avg: 415.3     median: 427 (47%)     max: 439 Points
495 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1043     avg: 1302     median: 1233 (3%)     max: 1630 Points
4288 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 539     avg: 662     median: 712 (4%)     max: 736 Points
1863 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 153     avg: 165     median: 170 (51%)     max: 172 Points
193 Points (58%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.87     avg: 6.4     median: 6.4 (8%)     max: 7.94 Points
18.2 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.77     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (48%)     max: 2.05 Points
2.2 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6044     avg: 6450     median: 6449.5 (39%)     max: 6855 Points
5866 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 15373     avg: 19601     median: 19601 (14%)     max: 23829 Points
37938 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
20535 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8073 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
265 s (3%)
88.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.8 s (2%)
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4513 Points (7%)
4548 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 13921     avg: 17144     median: 18342 (11%)     max: 19168 MIPS
48577 MIPS (28%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4091     avg: 4183     median: 4205 (50%)     max: 4252 MIPS
4634 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
38.1 fps (13%)
106 fps (37%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
167.5 fps (39%)
223 fps (51%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.632     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (8%)     max: 4.71 fps
12.2 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (13%)
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.7 GB/s (12%)
11.2 GB/s (29%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 771     avg: 880     median: 794 (6%)     max: 1075 Seconds
297 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (18%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
8736 Points (19%)
12448 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.2 s (2%)
9.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.1 s (1%)
21.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
456.5 s (2%)
547 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
24378 Points (21%)
57045 Points (50%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4649     avg: 6765     median: 6764.5 (18%)     max: 8880 Points
15184 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 18908     avg: 34807     median: 34806.5 (28%)     max: 50705 Points
63010 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 18887     avg: 34525     median: 34524.5 (28%)     max: 50162 Points
62786 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 54327     avg: 54876     median: 54876 (46%)     max: 55425 Points
67850 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5499     avg: 6720     median: 6720 (17%)     max: 7941 Points
15900 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 7242     avg: 9252     median: 9251.5 (16%)     max: 11261 Points
21873 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3618 Points (15%)
8966 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1163 Points (49%)
1218 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2713 Points (5%)
7675 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1126     avg: 1135     median: 1135 (5%)     max: 1144 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2707     avg: 3488     median: 3488 (11%)     max: 4269 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4947     avg: 5289     median: 5439 (54%)     max: 5481 Points
5372 Points (54%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12220     avg: 15692     median: 17322 (19%)     max: 17534 Points
30230 Points (34%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 880     avg: 972     median: 971.5 (1%)     max: 1063 ms
894 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 31078     avg: 33114     median: 33114 (30%)     max: 35150 Points
38616 Points (35%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
186 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
23.7 Watt (4%)
104.2 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.3     avg: 33.1     median: 33.1 (6%)     max: 41.9 Watt
104.5 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.6     avg: 19.9     median: 19.9 (15%)     max: 22.2 Points per Watt
17.8 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1035G7 → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS → 177% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 06. 07:19:15

#0 checking url part for id 11401 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11882 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.039s ... 0.04s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11401 +0.02s ... 0.06s

#7 got single benchmarks 11401 +0.023s ... 0.083s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11882 +0.02s ... 0.102s

#9 got single benchmarks 11882 +0.015s ... 0.117s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.361s ... 0.479s

#12 return log +0.032s ... 0.511s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)