Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-8130U vs AMD Ryzen 3 4300U vs AMD Ryzen 5 4680U

Intel Core i3-8130U

► remove from comparison Intel i3-8130U

The Intel Core i3-8130U is a power efficient dual-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks (most likely) based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation (and not Coffee Lake). It was announced in February 2018. Compared to its direct predecessor, the Core i3-7130U, the 8130U offers Turbo Boost for an increased single thread performance. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Clocked at 2.2 to 3.4 GHz, the Core i3-8130U offers a much better single core performance than the Core i3-7130U (2.7 GHz, no Turbo). Therefore, the overall performance should be comparable to the older Core i5-7260U (also 2.2 - 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-8250U offers four processor cores and therefore offers a much better multi-threaded performance.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. In the Core i3-8130U it is rather low clocked with 1 GHz compared to the 1.1 GHz in Core i7 models. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is most likely manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. According to Intel it can be configured to 10 Watt at 800 MHz (cTDP-down).

AMD Ryzen 3 4300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 4300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 4300U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir family. The 4300U integrates four cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture (quad core CPU). They are clocked at 2.7 (guaranteed base clock) to 3.7 GHz (Turbo) without SMT / Hyperthreading support (4 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. Compared to the faster Ryzen 5 4000 CPUs (e.g., Ryzen 5 4600U), the Ryzen 3 only offers 4 cores and lower Turbo clock speeds.

In addition to the four CPU cores, the APU also has the Radeon RX Vega 5 integrated graphics card with 5 CUs and up to 1400 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 4 MB of Level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4300U in our database matches the Core i5-1035G4 and the Core i5-11300H, both quad-core chips, in multi-thread performance. Technically a lower mid-range CPU, this Ryzen is light years ahead of Intel Pentiums and AMD Athlons that so many sub-US$500 laptops ship with.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of our system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 3 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with performance and clock speeds changing accordingly as a result. By going for the lowest value, it is possible to build passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs around this APU.

The 7 nm TSMC process the Ryzen 3 4300U is manufactured on makes for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 4680U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 4680U

The AMD Ryzen 5 4680U is a semi-custom APU of the Renoir family designed for Microsoft devices. The 4680U integrates six CPU cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture clocked at 2.2 GHz (base) to 4 GHz (Boost) with SMT support for a total 12 threads. The two advantages a 4680U has over the older Ryzen 5 4600U are its higher base clock speed and a faster iGPU.

Architecture

The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and in part thanks to this fact, AMD advertises a 2x performance per watt improvement over the 12 nm Ryzen 3000 mobile processors. The built-in dual-channel memory controller supports LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB of L3 cache can be found on the chip.

Just like the other mobile Ryzen 4000 CPUs, a 4680U supports PCI-Express 3.0. Please go to our Renoir processor hub page for additional information on the product family.

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to the Ryzen 7 4700U and the Core i5-10500H, the latter being a much more power-hungry chip. This makes the Ryzen a more than decent CPU for most tasks, as of early 2022.

Graphics

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a DX 12 compatible Radeon RX Vega 7 graphics adapter with 7 CUs (448 unified shaders) at up to 1,500 MHz. The Vega iGPU will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9 videos, but the newer AV1 codec will only be decoded via software. In terms of gaming, we are looking at an MX150-level performance. Pretty much all games released in 2020 can be played on low to medium settings in 720p on this graphics adapter.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers - Microsoft, in this case - are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Indeed, we saw the CPU consume roughly 23 watts when subjected to our usual stress testing routine.

The 7 nm TSMC process this Ryzen is built with makes for very decent, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i3-8130UAMD Ryzen 3 4300UAMD Ryzen 5 4680U
CodenameKaby Lake RefreshRenoir-U (Zen 2)Renoir-U (Zen 2)
SeriesIntel Kaby Lake RefreshAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Intel Core i7-8650U1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U « 2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U « 2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U « 2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2200 - 3400 MHz2700 - 3700 MHz2200 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB3 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 46 / 12
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm7 nm7 nm
SocketBGA1356FP6FP6
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR3 Memory Controller, HyperThreadingDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMELPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 ( - 1400 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 4300U
26.9 pt (45%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 4680U
28.6 pt (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3571 Points (3%)
7073 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1074 Points (45%)
1163 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
348 Points (38%)
min: 412     avg: 420.3     median: 422 (46%)     max: 427 Points
451 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
774 Points (2%)
min: 1432     avg: 1537     median: 1571 (4%)     max: 1609 Points
2478 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 320     avg: 333.3     median: 338 (2%)     max: 342 Points
min: 545     avg: 563     median: 562.5 (4%)     max: 580 Points
1291 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 138     avg: 139     median: 139 (39%)     max: 140 Points
min: 162.8     avg: 163.9     median: 163.9 (46%)     max: 165 Points
170 Points (47%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.8 Points (5%)
15.6 Points (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.6 Points (39%)
2 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5419     avg: 5448     median: 5447.5 (33%)     max: 5476 Points
5301 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 12142     avg: 12157     median: 12157 (9%)     max: 12172 Points
31826 Points (23%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
485.5 s (6%)
248.6 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14.3 s (3%)
8.2 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2168 Points (3%)
2397 Points (4%)
3576 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 15043     avg: 15824     median: 15824 (9%)     max: 16605 MIPS
32745 MIPS (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4014     avg: 4064     median: 4063.5 (48%)     max: 4113 MIPS
4077 MIPS (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
22.2 fps (7%)
35 fps (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
116.6 fps (27%)
172.3 fps (40%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.37     avg: 4.9     median: 4.9 (9%)     max: 5.36 fps
7.7 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (6%)
0.3 GB/s (10%)
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (6%)
0.6 GB/s (10%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2 GB/s (5%)
3.2 GB/s (8%)
8.3 GB/s (22%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 1310     avg: 1414     median: 1413.5 (18%)     max: 1517 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 868     avg: 888     median: 887.5 (6%)     max: 907 Seconds
458 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.652     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.686 sec
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4720 Points (10%)
6068 Points (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.1 s (2%)
10.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
26.2 s (1%)
24.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
661 s (3%)
581 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
20566 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4075     avg: 4183     median: 4126 (10%)     max: 4349 Points
6487 Points (16%)
10051 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
57907 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63885 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 47727     avg: 48886     median: 48885.5 (41%)     max: 50044 Points
66341 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3659     avg: 3800     median: 3797 (10%)     max: 3945 Points
5660 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5410     avg: 5509     median: 5508.5 (10%)     max: 5607 Points
8220 Points (15%)
16642 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2874 Points (12%)
5067 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1027     avg: 1047     median: 1046.5 (41%)     max: 1066 Points
1078 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3330     avg: 3439     median: 3438.5 (6%)     max: 3547 Points
5785 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1036 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3358 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3919     avg: 4001     median: 4000.5 (40%)     max: 4082 Points
4517 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7470     avg: 7891     median: 7890.5 (8%)     max: 8311 Points
13503 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3796     avg: 4155     median: 4154.5 (46%)     max: 4513 Points
4404 Points (49%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7123     avg: 8132     median: 8131.5 (12%)     max: 9140 Points
12789 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6935     avg: 7169     median: 7168.5 (13%)     max: 7402 Points
13134 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3107     avg: 3288     median: 3288 (64%)     max: 3469 Points
4042 Points (79%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7188 Points (11%)
13741 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3283 Points (49%)
4291 Points (64%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
6153 Points (50%)
8680 Points (70%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6309 Points (57%)
6660 Points (60%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
7456 Points (15%)
14171 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7557 Points (15%)
11775 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7131 Points (19%)
11281 Points (30%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1084     avg: 1443     median: 1374.5 (2%)     max: 1937 ms
min: 907     avg: 974     median: 973.5 (1%)     max: 1040 ms
877 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 91.3     avg: 187     median: 187 (2%)     max: 282.7 ms
102.5 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25180     avg: 27861     median: 27142.5 (21%)     max: 31980 Points
33152 Points (25%)
47184 Points (36%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
152.3 Points (42%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
153 Points (27%)
min: 185     avg: 194     median: 194 (35%)     max: 203 Points
198 Points (36%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
871 Points (33%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
33.4 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
31.7 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.3 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-8130U → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 4300U → 146% n=13

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4680U → 268% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 27. 13:24:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9518 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11697 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13178 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751023472s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:19:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9518 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 9518 +0.013s ... 0.023s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11697 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#11 got single benchmarks 11697 +0.007s ... 0.034s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13178 +0.004s ... 0.038s

#13 got single benchmarks 13178 +0.003s ... 0.041s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.096s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.096s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)