Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285HX

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is a mobile high-end CPU for gaming notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 24 cores consisting of 8 fast performance cores with up to 5.5 GHz and 16 smaller efficiency cores with up to 4.6 GHz clock speed. The CPU has access to 40 MB L2 cache and 36 MB L3 cache and is specified with a TDP of 55 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Enterprise. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB DDR5-6400 (dual channel, ECC optional). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is a small Intel Graphics graphics card with four Xe cores running at 300 - 2000 MHz.

Performance - High End

The performance of the Ultra 9 285HX should be slightly below the similar Desktop Core Ultra 9 285K (higher clocked with up to 5.7 GHz and more TDP with 125 watts). Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should outperform the old Raptor Lake Core i9-14900HX (8 + 16 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Production - TSMC and Foveros

The Arrow Lake-HX chips are based on the desktop Arrow Lake-S chips and are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 9955HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a high-end notebook processor from the Fire Range series with 16 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 32 threads simultaneously. Unlike the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, the chip does not offer a 3D V-Cache. The chip was presented at CES in early 2025 and is intended for fast and expensive gaming laptops.

Thanks to the high-clocked 16 Zen 5 cores, the performance of the CPU should be excellent and only be outperformed by the 9955HX3D thanks to the 3D V-Cache. Together with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX at the top of the mobile CPUs.

The 9955HX is intended for large and heavy gaming notebooks and is therefore configurable from 55-75 watts TDP (default 55 watts). The SoC is manufactured in the modern 4nm FinFET process at TSMC (both compute dies, I/O die in 6nm) and should therefore have very good energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 285HXAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
CodenameArrow Lake-HXFire Range-HX (Zen 5)
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeAMD Dragon Range
Series: Dragon Range Fire Range-HX (Zen 5)
Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX compare2.1 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX « 2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX compare2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX compare2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX compare2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX compare2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX compare2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D compare2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX « 2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX compare3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
Clock2100 - 5500 MHz2500 - 5400 MHz
L2 Cache40 MB16 MB
L3 Cache36 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 24
8 x 5.5 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core
16 / 32
16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP55 Watt55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2160 Watt
Technology3 nm4 nm
iGPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (300 - 2000 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT8
Chip AI36 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache1.3 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 285HX
48.2 pt (80%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 9955HX
50.1 pt (83%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 124.7     avg: 130.5     median: 132.2 (66%)     max: 135 Points
min: 125.3     avg: 128.9     median: 129.5 (65%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1832     avg: 2003     median: 1936 (36%)     max: 2298 Points
min: 1775     avg: 1951     median: 1971.5 (37%)     max: 2069 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 34955     avg: 37290     median: 37694 (35%)     max: 40117 Points
min: 36078     avg: 38155     median: 39384 (37%)     max: 39690 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2057     avg: 2171     median: 2185 (89%)     max: 2303 Points
min: 1828     avg: 2128     median: 2176 (88%)     max: 2183 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 799     avg: 837     median: 839 (91%)     max: 884 Points
min: 819     avg: 848     median: 853 (93%)     max: 854 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 13728     avg: 14639     median: 14915 (36%)     max: 15751 Points
min: 14166     avg: 14877     median: 15309 (37%)     max: 15524 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5427     avg: 5724     median: 5686 (36%)     max: 6232 Points
min: 5639     avg: 5933     median: 6046 (38%)     max: 6103 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 307     avg: 324.2     median: 324 (90%)     max: 340 Points
min: 320     avg: 334.1     median: 336 (93%)     max: 338 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
68 Points (88%)
min: 64.66     avg: 67.4     median: 67.4 (87%)     max: 69.87 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 4.1     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (97%)     max: 4.21 Points
min: 3.72     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (94%)     max: 3.97 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12496 Points (75%)
min: 8710     avg: 9087     median: 9178.5 (55%)     max: 9279 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
99662 Points (72%)
min: 73626     avg: 76474     median: 76058 (55%)     max: 80152 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
149115 Points (95%)
min: 14159     avg: 76087     median: 76087 (49%)     max: 138015 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
19056 Points (23%)
min: 17067     avg: 17205     median: 17205 (21%)     max: 17343 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
44.2 s (1%)
min: 32.998     avg: 90.4     median: 33.9 (0%)     max: 204.3 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.5 s (1%)
min: 2.195     avg: 3.3     median: 2.2 (0%)     max: 5.6 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10402 Points (17%)
min: 9033     avg: 21586     median: 10079 (16%)     max: 45647 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 101802     avg: 112768     median: 109822 (63%)     max: 128778 MIPS
min: 132435     avg: 139265     median: 141048 (81%)     max: 144064 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6665     avg: 6715     median: 6680 (79%)     max: 6822 MIPS
min: 7061     avg: 7300     median: 7393 (87%)     max: 7462 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
259.5 fps (7%)
min: 233.5     avg: 234.8     median: 234.8 (6%)     max: 236 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
390.5 fps (10%)
min: 343.5     avg: 351.3     median: 351.3 (9%)     max: 359 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 35.3     avg: 38.7     median: 36.8 (65%)     max: 44.3 fps
min: 38.9     avg: 41.4     median: 42.1 (74%)     max: 43 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.2 GB/s (65%)
min: 3.1     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (91%)     max: 3.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4 GB/s (69%)
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (85%)     max: 5 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.7 GB/s (38%)
min: 27.3     avg: 27.6     median: 27.6 (72%)     max: 27.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 132     avg: 151.2     median: 153 (2%)     max: 162 Seconds
min: 122     avg: 129.7     median: 125 (2%)     max: 145 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 83     avg: 92.8     median: 94 (1%)     max: 98 Seconds
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 91 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4012     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4444 sec
min: 0.3517     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3737 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18868 Points (40%)
min: 19498     avg: 19963     median: 19731 (42%)     max: 20890 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7 s (2%)
min: 7.701     avg: 7.9     median: 7.8 (2%)     max: 8.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.1 s (1%)
min: 16.472     avg: 16.8     median: 16.6 (1%)     max: 17.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
375.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
123473 Points (95%)
min: 93819     avg: 98006     median: 98275.5 (75%)     max: 101654 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20813     avg: 25156     median: 25545 (63%)     max: 29213 Points
min: 29429     avg: 32133     median: 32436.5 (80%)     max: 33671 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 108978     avg: 112222     median: 112222 (91%)     max: 115465 Points
min: 78557     avg: 82036     median: 83067 (67%)     max: 84483 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 109217     avg: 112396     median: 112396 (91%)     max: 115575 Points
min: 78596     avg: 81706     median: 81638 (66%)     max: 84884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 112055     avg: 114521     median: 114521 (92%)     max: 116987 Points
min: 81426     avg: 82900     median: 81582 (66%)     max: 85692 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 19072     avg: 24818     median: 25371 (64%)     max: 29131 Points
min: 23962     avg: 24593     median: 23963 (61%)     max: 25855 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 44587     avg: 48139     median: 48028 (86%)     max: 51653 Points
min: 37802     avg: 41920     median: 42652.5 (76%)     max: 44312 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12041     avg: 15214     median: 16247 (68%)     max: 17769 Points
min: 9758     avg: 12610     median: 13012 (55%)     max: 13348 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2907     avg: 3019     median: 3028 (70%)     max: 3088 Points
min: 3156     avg: 3215     median: 3230 (75%)     max: 3253 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 18285     avg: 20047     median: 20630 (80%)     max: 22104 Points
min: 16313     avg: 18689     median: 19052 (74%)     max: 19587 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2893 Points (92%)
3071 Points (97%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
17559 Points (72%)
18139 Points (74%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2121     avg: 2179     median: 2183 (73%)     max: 2232 Points
min: 2307     avg: 2380     median: 2395 (81%)     max: 2425 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18992     avg: 23687     median: 24910 (45%)     max: 27010 Points
min: 20576     avg: 21787     median: 21893 (39%)     max: 22406 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2198 Points (10%)
min: 2233     avg: 2235     median: 2235 (10%)     max: 2237 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
22252 Points (70%)
min: 20686     avg: 21227     median: 21227 (67%)     max: 21768 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9079 Points (91%)
min: 9140     avg: 9238     median: 9237.5 (92%)     max: 9335 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
85201 Points (84%)
min: 87050     avg: 88125     median: 88125 (86%)     max: 89200 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 408     avg: 422.6     median: 420 (0%)     max: 439 ms
min: 397     avg: 415.3     median: 404 (0%)     max: 453 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
136623 Points (90%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 306     avg: 314.2     median: 315 (82%)     max: 323 Points
min: 287     avg: 301.8     median: 298.8 (78%)     max: 322 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 327     avg: 346.4     median: 343 (62%)     max: 362 Points
min: 315     avg: 335     median: 335 (60%)     max: 361 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2142     avg: 2208     median: 2208 (81%)     max: 2267 Points
min: 2176     avg: 2214     median: 2220.5 (82%)     max: 2259 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 159.8     avg: 188.2     median: 168.7 (29%)     max: 268 Watt
min: 122.3     avg: 169.1     median: 162.5 (28%)     max: 229 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 202     avg: 235.8     median: 228 (42%)     max: 289 Watt
min: 143.7     avg: 179.6     median: 176.8 (32%)     max: 221 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 6.25     avg: 22.5     median: 23.4 (15%)     max: 35.8 Watt
min: 19.3     avg: 27.4     median: 27.3 (18%)     max: 35.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.85     avg: 20.4     median: 19 (14%)     max: 34.3 Watt
min: 13.6     avg: 18.2     median: 15.7 (11%)     max: 25.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 21.6     avg: 24.6     median: 24 (18%)     max: 28.1 Points per Watt
min: 32.6     avg: 35     median: 32.8 (24%)     max: 39.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX → 100% n=53

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX → 101% n=53

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 09. 02:56:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18884 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18731 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767923809s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Jan 2026 12:03:32 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18884 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 18884 +0.011s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18731 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 18731 +0.012s ... 0.036s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.062s ... 0.098s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.1s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)