Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs Intel Core i3-7167U

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

► remove from comparison AMD R9 5950X

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a high-end 16-core, hyperthreaded (SMT) Vermeer Series desktop processor. With 32 threads, the new flagship offers as many threads as the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. Introduced on October 8, 2020, the Ryzen 9 5950X is the fastest 16-core processor and is specified at 105 watts TDP.

The Ryzen 9 5950X runs at 3.4 GHz to 4.9 GHz (single core). Wen all 16 cores are loaded, up to 4.5 GHz are still possible.

The internal structure of the processor has not changed fundamentally at first glance. The CCX structure has changed a bit compared to Zen 2, because now a CCX consists of up to 8 CPU cores. So each individual core can access the complete L3 cache (32 MByte). Furthermore the CCX modules are connected to each other via the same I/O die, which we already know from Zen2. According to AMD, the Infinity fabric should now reach clock rates of up to 2 Ghz, which in turn allows a RAM clock of 4,000 MHz without performance loss.

Performance

The average 5950X in our database matches the Core i9-12900K, the Core i9-12900HX and also the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX in multi-thread performance, making this Ryzen a great processor for pretty much any task imaginable as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 105 W. It will, however, happily consume much more than that as long as the cooling solution is able to handle the heat - even before one starts considering the possibility of overclocking the thing.

The Ryzen 9 5950X is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i3-7167U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-7167U is a dual-core SoC for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. The CPU has two processor cores clocked at 2.8 GHz (no Turbo Boost). The processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper Threading. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 GPU with 64 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

The i3-7167U does not have a Turbo, only 3MB L3 cache and the slowest clocked Iris Plus GPU compared to the faster Core i5 and i7 models.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The Core i3-7167U is a bit faster than the Core i5-6200U (up to 2.8 GHz, 15 Watts, no eDRAM) due to the missing Turbo. The CPU performance is therefore sufficient for most scenarios. Some games might still require a real quad-core processor and therefore nit run perfectly on the dual-core processor, despite Hyper Threading.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 650 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1000 MHz (slowest Iris 650, fastest is 1100 MHz in the i7-7567U, for example) and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 920MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Pro 550, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for dual-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 5950XIntel Core i3-7167U
CodenameVermeer (Zen 3)Kaby Lake
SeriesAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)Intel Kaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X « 3.4 - 4.9 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X compare3.8 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X compare3.4 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U « 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock3400 - 4900 MHz2800 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB128 KB
L2 Cache8 MB512 KB
L3 Cache64 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 322 / 4
TDP105 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
Die SizeCPU cores: 2x 80.7 sq. mm., I/O: 125 mm2
SocketAM4BGA1356
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
Architecturex86x86
$799 U.S.$304 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (300 - 1000 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 5950X
41.8 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24972     avg: 26017     median: 26017 (24%)     max: 27062 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1579     avg: 1614     median: 1614 (66%)     max: 1649 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 617     avg: 629     median: 629 (69%)     max: 641 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9640     avg: 10061     median: 10061 (25%)     max: 10482 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4156     avg: 4324     median: 4324 (27%)     max: 4492 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 261     avg: 266.5     median: 266.5 (74%)     max: 272 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 46.05     avg: 47.8     median: 47.8 (62%)     max: 49.6 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.02     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (73%)     max: 3.14 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6564     avg: 6690     median: 6689.5 (40%)     max: 6815 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 55185     avg: 56641     median: 56640.5 (41%)     max: 58096 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 99617     avg: 102128     median: 102128 (65%)     max: 104638 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12655     avg: 12967     median: 12967 (16%)     max: 13279 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 52     avg: 58.5     median: 58.5 (1%)     max: 64.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.538     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (1%)     max: 5.928 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 12503     avg: 12736     median: 12735.5 (20%)     max: 12968 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 118165     avg: 122979     median: 122978 (71%)     max: 127792 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6729     avg: 6852     median: 6851.5 (81%)     max: 6974 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 203     avg: 212     median: 212 (5%)     max: 221 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 321.5     avg: 330     median: 330 (8%)     max: 338.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 29.9     avg: 30.9     median: 30.9 (54%)     max: 31.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.3     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (69%)     max: 2.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 3.3     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (60%)     max: 3.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 25.1     avg: 26     median: 26 (68%)     max: 26.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 112.8     avg: 117.7     median: 117.7 (1%)     max: 122.5 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4556     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4698 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 17229     avg: 17657     median: 17656.5 (38%)     max: 18084 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.065     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.405 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.28     avg: 15.7     median: 15.7 (1%)     max: 16.02 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 349.3     avg: 361.5     median: 361.5 (2%)     max: 373.7 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 84237     avg: 85367     median: 85367 (66%)     max: 86497 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23012     avg: 25067     median: 25154.5 (62%)     max: 27383 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 70120     avg: 77979     median: 79716 (65%)     max: 84100 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 69902     avg: 78121     median: 80185 (65%)     max: 84275 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 82412     avg: 82452     median: 82452 (66%)     max: 82492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 21419     avg: 22558     median: 22436 (57%)     max: 23939 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 34080     avg: 37236     median: 37498.5 (67%)     max: 39600 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11111     avg: 12919     median: 13441 (57%)     max: 14559 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2256 Points (52%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
13355 Points (52%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1621     avg: 1652     median: 1651.5 (56%)     max: 1682 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15605     avg: 16248     median: 16248 (29%)     max: 16891 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1625     avg: 1654     median: 1654 (7%)     max: 1683 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15396     avg: 15983     median: 15983 (50%)     max: 16570 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7021     avg: 7119     median: 7118.5 (71%)     max: 7216 Points
3546 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 57584     avg: 60409     median: 60408.5 (59%)     max: 63233 Points
7218 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 558     avg: 570     median: 569.5 (1%)     max: 581 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 288     avg: 289.5     median: 289.5 (52%)     max: 291 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1495 Points (56%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 232.8     avg: 242.6     median: 242.6 (42%)     max: 252.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 226.1     avg: 227.4     median: 227.4 (41%)     max: 228.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 18.2     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (14%)     max: 19.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 5950X → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-7167U → 31% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 28. 07:43:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12787 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8455 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761633790s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 Oct 2025 05:18:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12787 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 12787 +0.009s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8455 +0s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 8455 +0s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.044s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)