Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Intel Core i7-9700K vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7800X3D

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a high-end desktop processor from the Raphael series with 8 Zen 4 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), allowing it to handle up to 16 threads simultaneously. After its announcement in January 2023 at CES in Las Vegas, it was launched in April 2023. Following the launch of the two top models, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, the third model was introduced, which offers significantly more gaming performance with the 3D V-Cache.

The CPU cores have a base clock of 4.2 GHz and can be boosted up to 5 GHz (single-core turbo). The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D features a CCD with 8 cores, which includes the fast 3D V-Cache. This differs significantly from the two Ryzen 9 models, as they have two CCDs, but only one of them can utilize the 3D V-Cache.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is consistently good, although its multi-threaded performance suffers a bit due to the eight native compute cores. However, the real strength of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D lies in gaming performance, where it excels. In tests, we see consistently high gaming performance, even surpassing that of an Intel Core i9-13900K.

In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D aligns with the other two models featuring 3D V-Cache, making the 8-core processor extremely power-efficient. In numbers, this means that the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is specified with a TDP of up to 120 watts. The PPT (Package Power Tracking) is also rated up to 162 watts. For comparison, an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is specified with 170 watts (TDP) or 230 watts (PPT).

Intel Core i7-9700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9700K

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking and integrates 8 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 8 threads) clocked at 3.6 - 4.9 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard.

Thanks to the two additional cores, the performance in multi-threaded applications is even better than the old Core i8-8700K with 6 cores and Hyperthreading. As a high end desktop CPU, the i9-9700K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 200 Watt and higher.

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7950X3D

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a high-end desktop processor of the Raphael series with 16 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), which means it can process up to 32 threads simultaneously. With the release in February 2023, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is AMD's fastest consumer processor and the new top model of the 7000 series. The CPU cores clock from 4.2 GHz (base clock) up to 5.7 GHz (single core Turbo). In addition, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a CCD with 8 cores that can access the fast 3D V-cache, which offers considerably more gaming performance.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is consistently excellent in all applications tested. In addition, AMD was again able to increase the single-thread performance compared to the non-X3D models. Nevertheless, the lower base clock compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X means that a small drop in multi-thread performance has to be accepted.

The internal structure of the processor is comparable to the previous AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is also still based on the chiplet design consisting of two CCD clusters with 8 cores each. However, the two CCDs differ significantly from each other because one offers the fast 3D V-Cache, which primarily improves gaming performance. In testing, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D was able to put the Intel Core i9-13900K in second place and is the fastest gaming CPU on the market at the time of testing. 

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is an extremely energy-efficient CPU with up to 162 watts (PPT) and is significantly more frugal under load than an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (max. 230 watts).

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3DIntel Core i7-9700KAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
CodenameRaphael (Zen4)Coffee Lake-RRaphael (Zen4)
SeriesAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)Intel Coffee LakeAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
Series: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D « 4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K « 3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D « 4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock4200 - 5000 MHz3600 - 4900 MHz4200 - 5700 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB1 MB
L2 Cache8 MB2 MB16 MB
L3 Cache96 MB12 MB128 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 816 / 32
16 x 5.7 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP120 Watt95 Watt120 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors6570 Million13140 Million
Technology5 nm14++ nm5 nm
Voltage1.1 - 1.2 V
Die Size193 mm2178 mm2263 mm2
max. Temp.89 °C100 °C89 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)FCLGA1151AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2Dual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
iGPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$449 U.S.$385 U.S.$699 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7800X3D
42.3 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7950X3D
49.9 pt (83%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16688     avg: 17197     median: 16817 (16%)     max: 18086 Points
36291 Points (34%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1646     avg: 1726     median: 1713 (72%)     max: 1820 Points
2053 Points (86%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 663     avg: 686     median: 686 (75%)     max: 709 Points
475 Points (52%)
795 Points (87%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6488     avg: 6805     median: 6804.5 (17%)     max: 7121 Points
3250 Points (8%)
14188 Points (35%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2783     avg: 2879     median: 2878.5 (18%)     max: 2974 Points
min: 1433     avg: 1449     median: 1449 (9%)     max: 1465 Points
5974 Points (38%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 272     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (78%)     max: 291 Points
min: 203     avg: 205.5     median: 205.5 (57%)     max: 208 Points
326 Points (90%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (43%)
15.8 Points (20%)
64.6 Points (84%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (81%)
2.4 Points (56%)
3.9 Points (92%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8026 Points (48%)
min: 7624     avg: 7653     median: 7653 (46%)     max: 7682 Points
16551 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51950 Points (38%)
min: 42677     avg: 42778     median: 42777.5 (31%)     max: 42878 Points
138015 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
94035 Points (60%)
53600 Points (34%)
72361 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14485 Points (18%)
9774 Points (12%)
8853 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
62.7 s (1%)
120.5 s (1%)
33.9 s (0%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
4.5 s (1%)
2 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16585 Points (26%)
7396 Points (12%)
15779 Points (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 75558     avg: 80313     median: 80312.5 (46%)     max: 85067 MIPS
159341 MIPS (91%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7412     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (92%)     max: 8235 MIPS
8321 MIPS (98%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
169.3 fps (4%)
94.8 fps (2%)
265.5 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
344 fps (9%)
270 fps (7%)
392.5 fps (10%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 22.1     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (41%)     max: 24.4 fps
13 fps (23%)
42.4 fps (75%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
0.8 GB/s (23%)
2.8 GB/s (82%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
1.3 GB/s (22%)
4.2 GB/s (72%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.3 GB/s (40%)
8.1 GB/s (21%)
26.9 GB/s (70%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 266     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (4%)     max: 299 Seconds
133 Seconds (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 169     avg: 178     median: 178 (1%)     max: 187 Seconds
307 Seconds (2%)
86 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4152     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4479 sec
0.4 sec (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16892 Points (36%)
min: 12844     avg: 13016     median: 12928 (28%)     max: 13447 Points
20279 Points (43%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.1 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
6.1 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.3 s (1%)
17.4 s (1%)
13.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
337.6 s (1%)
421.1 s (2%)
305.1 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
97391 Points (75%)
min: 53605     avg: 54313     median: 54484 (42%)     max: 54680 Points
99321 Points (76%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 30767     avg: 32947     median: 32947 (81%)     max: 35127 Points
min: 14489     avg: 15025     median: 14657 (36%)     max: 16091 Points
36991 Points (91%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
89617 Points (73%)
min: 81711     avg: 82658     median: 82294 (67%)     max: 83908 Points
86389 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
89287 Points (72%)
min: 83615     avg: 83781     median: 83781 (68%)     max: 83947 Points
86306 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
91846 Points (74%)
min: 81896     avg: 84164     median: 84164 (68%)     max: 86432 Points
87725 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
25510 Points (65%)
min: 12856     avg: 13012     median: 13018 (33%)     max: 13171 Points
26168 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 30333     avg: 31455     median: 30687 (55%)     max: 33345 Points
min: 18241     avg: 18437     median: 18332 (33%)     max: 18780 Points
44787 Points (80%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10908     avg: 12327     median: 11975 (50%)     max: 14098 Points
min: 7736     avg: 7954     median: 7875 (33%)     max: 8349 Points
17206 Points (73%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2634 Points (64%)
2990 Points (72%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
14288 Points (55%)
19960 Points (77%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2175 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12046 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1856     avg: 1934     median: 1920 (73%)     max: 2027 Points
1300 Points (49%)
2311 Points (88%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12073     avg: 13013     median: 12715 (23%)     max: 14252 Points
7440 Points (13%)
24343 Points (44%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1938 Points (8%)
2183 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13888 Points (44%)
23720 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9097 Points (91%)
min: 5925     avg: 5984     median: 5984 (60%)     max: 6043 Points
9240 Points (92%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
54840 Points (54%)
min: 28792     avg: 29226     median: 29225.5 (29%)     max: 29659 Points
87922 Points (86%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5744 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
26471 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
27774 Points (49%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4825 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 487     avg: 504     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 520 ms
948 ms (1%)
437 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
41962 Points (31%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
282 Points (77%)
313 Points (86%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
353 Points (63%)
383 Points (69%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2216 Points (83%)
2193 Points (82%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
218 Watt (38%)
222.4 Watt (38%)
276 Watt (48%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
207 Watt (38%)
202.6 Watt (37%)
273 Watt (50%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
121.6 Watt (80%)
118.4 Watt (78%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
14.4 Points per Watt (11%)
7.1 Points per Watt (5%)
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9700K → 65% n=37

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D → 142% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 08. 18:09:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15064 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11116 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 15000 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759939798s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15064 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 15064 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11116 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#11 got single benchmarks 11116 +0.008s ... 0.016s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 15000 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#13 got single benchmarks 15000 +0.005s ... 0.025s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.059s ... 0.084s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)