Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 6800U vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U

AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 6800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The R7 6800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.7 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.7 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. Compared to the similar R7 6800H, the 6800U offers a lower base clock speed and a lower TDP.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.2 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

Performance

The average 6800U in our database easily shoulders its way towards the best of the best, trading blows with the Core i7-1270P, the Core i7-11850H and the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Throw everything you can at this little guy. He'll take it all and ask for more.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of more than 20 W, the Mercury EM680 is among the fastest systems built around the 6800U that we know of. It can be at least 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must.

The R7 6800U is manufactured on the 6 nm TSMC process for higher-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 6650U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U is a processor for thin and light laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The Ryzen has six out of a possible eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.9 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. The Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U is the professional version of the consumer R5 6600U with additional management features and the Microsoft Pluton Security processor. Compared to the similar R5 6650H, the 6850U offers a lower base clock speed and a lower TDP.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

Performance

The average 6650U in our database is very close to the Core i7-1260P and the Core i7-10870H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a really good result, as of late 2022.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 32 W, the ThinkPad T16 G1 is among the fastest laptops built around the 6650U that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

In the 6000 series, AMD finally switched to the current RDNA 2 graphics architecture for the iGPU. The 6650U only offers the small Radeon 660M with 6 of the 12 CUs enabled and 1.9 GHz max. clock rate.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 - 28 Watts (default). The power efficiency should be very good, thanks to the improved 6nm process and additional power saving features in the 6000 series.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 6800UAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
CodenameRembrandt-U (Zen 3+)Rembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+)
Series: Rembrandt (Zen 3+) Rembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U « 2.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600U compare2.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U compare2.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U « 2.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2700 - 4700 MHz2900 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache4 MB3 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 166 / 12
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology6 nm6 nm
max. Temp.95 °C95 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2FP7/FP7r2
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 6800U
39.1 pt (54%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 6650U
37 pt (51%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
79 Points (55%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
496 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9130     avg: 10653     median: 10546 (10%)     max: 11741 Points
min: 7805     avg: 8762     median: 8854 (8%)     max: 9534 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 878     avg: 1418     median: 1506 (64%)     max: 1534 Points
min: 1439     avg: 1460     median: 1463 (62%)     max: 1476 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 341     avg: 553     median: 585.5 (65%)     max: 602 Points
min: 548     avg: 567     median: 570 (63%)     max: 578 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3529     avg: 4122     median: 4083.5 (10%)     max: 4574 Points
min: 3057     avg: 3399     median: 3427.5 (8%)     max: 3684 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1463     avg: 1766     median: 1776 (11%)     max: 1978.53 Points
min: 1299     avg: 1443     median: 1459.5 (9%)     max: 1555 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 142.6     avg: 225.4     median: 242 (73%)     max: 246 Points
min: 230     avg: 232.3     median: 232.5 (70%)     max: 234 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.1 Points (27%)
16.2 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.9 Points (72%)
2.8 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6450 Points (39%)
6062 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
35314 Points (26%)
32262 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
60447 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12163 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
113.5 s (1%)
243.3 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.5 s (1%)
7.7 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4639 Points (7%)
5343 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 40058     avg: 49128     median: 50614 (29%)     max: 53934 MIPS
min: 32613     avg: 37464     median: 37856.5 (22%)     max: 41530 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3398     avg: 5120     median: 5452.5 (65%)     max: 5511 MIPS
min: 5175     avg: 5265     median: 5228.5 (63%)     max: 5427 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
101.1 fps (35%)
86.3 fps (30%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
219.5 fps (51%)
224.3 fps (52%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.8     avg: 13.1     median: 13.1 (23%)     max: 14.2 fps
min: 8.71     avg: 10.1     median: 9.8 (17%)     max: 11.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
0.6 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.7 GB/s (28%)
5.5 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 474     avg: 516     median: 504 (6%)     max: 572 Seconds
min: 565     avg: 740     median: 712.5 (9%)     max: 968 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 272     avg: 302.5     median: 304 (2%)     max: 347 Seconds
min: 328     avg: 415.6     median: 397 (3%)     max: 548 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.508     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.529 sec
min: 0.521     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.59 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9102     avg: 9965     median: 9964.5 (21%)     max: 10827 Points
11322 Points (24%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.9 s (2%)
7.9 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.3 s (1%)
19.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
692 s (3%)
712 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 52884     avg: 55833     median: 55833 (49%)     max: 58782 Points
37700 Points (33%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12198     avg: 14018     median: 14280 (39%)     max: 15136 Points
min: 11332     avg: 12182     median: 12335 (33%)     max: 12727 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 51726     avg: 54789     median: 54788.5 (45%)     max: 57851 Points
min: 65436     avg: 69641     median: 69640.5 (57%)     max: 73845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 51601     avg: 54760     median: 54760 (44%)     max: 57919 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 58776     avg: 63558     median: 63558 (54%)     max: 68340 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12402     avg: 13741     median: 13574 (34%)     max: 15247 Points
min: 9476     avg: 11014     median: 11062 (28%)     max: 12455 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15312     avg: 18647     median: 18882 (34%)     max: 21992 Points
min: 14814     avg: 17055     median: 16969 (30%)     max: 19469 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6355     avg: 7107     median: 7103.5 (30%)     max: 7731 Points
min: 5400     avg: 5555     median: 5457.5 (23%)     max: 5904 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2028 Points (62%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
8771 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 926     avg: 1431     median: 1514 (64%)     max: 1555 Points
min: 1433     avg: 1456     median: 1452.5 (61%)     max: 1487 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6854     avg: 7729     median: 7678 (14%)     max: 8935 Points
min: 6171     avg: 6594     median: 6488.5 (12%)     max: 7227 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1306     avg: 1433     median: 1462.5 (6%)     max: 1500 Points
1417 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7024     avg: 7646     median: 7767 (24%)     max: 8026 Points
7218 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5657     avg: 6065     median: 6261 (63%)     max: 6278 Points
5910 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 27734     avg: 30075     median: 30925 (34%)     max: 31566 Points
28857 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 594     avg: 690     median: 634.5 (1%)     max: 1016 ms
min: 615     avg: 646     median: 631.5 (1%)     max: 707 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 43921     avg: 62717     median: 69752 (63%)     max: 74479 Points
72306 Points (65%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 133.2     avg: 198.2     median: 213 (61%)     max: 221 Points
min: 176.4     avg: 188.3     median: 185.4 (53%)     max: 206 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 181.3     avg: 254.9     median: 270 (56%)     max: 295 Points
min: 225     avg: 233.5     median: 233.5 (49%)     max: 242 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1009     avg: 1436     median: 1481 (57%)     max: 1575 Points
min: 1338     avg: 1396     median: 1419 (54%)     max: 1432 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.8     avg: 47.2     median: 48 (8%)     max: 55.6 Watt
min: 36.5     avg: 41.3     median: 39.5 (7%)     max: 49.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.3     avg: 50     median: 47 (9%)     max: 58 Watt
min: 43.6     avg: 49.6     median: 50.5 (9%)     max: 54.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.62     avg: 6.8     median: 7.2 (5%)     max: 8.73 Watt
min: 3.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (3%)     max: 6.59 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 8.59     avg: 8.9     median: 8.8 (10%)     max: 9.41 Watt
min: 3.41     avg: 4.5     median: 4.7 (5%)     max: 5.55 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 34.1     avg: 36.2     median: 34.2 (25%)     max: 40.2 Points per Watt
min: 28.1     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (22%)     max: 31.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 6800U → 100% n=45

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U → 91% n=45

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 19:53:39

#0 checking url part for id 14088 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14384 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.043s ... 0.044s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14088 +0.015s ... 0.059s

#7 got single benchmarks 14088 +0.023s ... 0.082s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14384 +0.014s ... 0.096s

#9 got single benchmarks 14384 +0.013s ... 0.109s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.109s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.304s ... 0.413s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.436s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)