Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 7600 vs Intel Core i5-11400F vs AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7600

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a fast mid-range desktop processor of the Raphael series. It offers 6 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (12 threads). The cores clock from 3.8 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost).

The Raphael series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon Graphics iGPU) in 6nm.

The R5 7600X is rated at 65 Watt TDP.

Intel Core i5-11400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11400F

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a fast six-core desktop processor based on the new Rocket Lake architecture, which was introduced in March 2021. The processor clocks with a base clock of 2.6 GHz and reaches an all-core boost of 4.2 GHz under load. In single-thread applications, the Intel Core i5-11400F even reaches up to 4.4 GHz. Intel also gives the Rocket Lake processors the Hyperthreading feature, which allows the i5-11400F to process up to 12 threads simultaneously. As known, the Intel Core i5-11400F is manufactured in the 14 nm process. Nevertheless, many changes have been made with the Rocket Lake architecture, which is also reflected in the performance compared to the Comet Lake. The Intel Core i5-11400F is a non-K CPU, which means that there is no freely selectable multiplier. Thus, the scope for overclocking is relatively small.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-10400F, the Core i5-11400F offers a significantly better IPC. This can be seen clearly in the single-core benchmarks. But the multi-core performance also benefits from the better IPC compared to Comet-Lake. A performance increase of up to 20 percent can be expected. The Core i5 has to do without the TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost). However, 4.2 GHz is still possible when all cores are loaded. Due to the very high single-thread performance, the Intel Core i5-11400F is best suited for video games.

Graphics

The processors marked with "F" in the nomenclature don't offer an integrated graphics unit. All other non-F processors can fall back on the Intel UHD Graphics 750 and also allow operation without a dedicated graphics card.

Power consumption

The TDP turns out relatively low with 65 watts. This is the PL1 value. For Turbo, the Intel Core i5-11400F offers a higher TDP of up to 154 watts with PL2. However, this may only be applied for a maximum of 28 seconds (dew). A good air cooler should be able to handle the resulting waste heat, so no AiO is necessary for this processor.

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7800X3D

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a high-end desktop processor from the Raphael series with 8 Zen 4 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), allowing it to handle up to 16 threads simultaneously. After its announcement in January 2023 at CES in Las Vegas, it was launched in April 2023. Following the launch of the two top models, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, the third model was introduced, which offers significantly more gaming performance with the 3D V-Cache.

The CPU cores have a base clock of 4.2 GHz and can be boosted up to 5 GHz (single-core turbo). The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D features a CCD with 8 cores, which includes the fast 3D V-Cache. This differs significantly from the two Ryzen 9 models, as they have two CCDs, but only one of them can utilize the 3D V-Cache.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is consistently good, although its multi-threaded performance suffers a bit due to the eight native compute cores. However, the real strength of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D lies in gaming performance, where it excels. In tests, we see consistently high gaming performance, even surpassing that of an Intel Core i9-13900K.

In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D aligns with the other two models featuring 3D V-Cache, making the 8-core processor extremely power-efficient. In numbers, this means that the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is specified with a TDP of up to 120 watts. The PPT (Package Power Tracking) is also rated up to 162 watts. For comparison, an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is specified with 170 watts (TDP) or 230 watts (PPT).

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 7600Intel Core i5-11400FAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
SeriesAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)Intel Rocket LakeAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
CodenameRaphael (Zen4)Rocket LakeRaphael (Zen4)
Series: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900K3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-117002.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D « 4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz2600 - 4400 MHz4200 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB480 KB0.1 MB
L2 Cache6 MB3 MB0 MB
L3 Cache32 MB12 MB96 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 128 / 16
TDP65 Watt65 Watt162 Watt
TransistorsCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million6570 Million
Technology5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V14 nm5 nm
Die Size1x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2276 mm21x 71 mm² (CCD) + 121 mm² (I/O) mm2
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C89 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)LGA1200AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
iGPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
$157 U.S.$449 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7600
47.2 pt (65%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11400F
36.2 pt (50%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7800X3D
48.3 pt (67%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12735 Points (12%)
10235 Points (10%)
min: 16688     avg: 17387     median: 17387 (16%)     max: 18086 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1852 Points (79%)
1339 Points (57%)
min: 1713     avg: 1767     median: 1766.5 (75%)     max: 1820 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
724 Points (80%)
502 Points (56%)
min: 663     avg: 686     median: 686 (76%)     max: 709 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5487 Points (13%)
3945 Points (10%)
min: 6488     avg: 6805     median: 6804.5 (17%)     max: 7121 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2339 Points (15%)
1574 Points (10%)
min: 2783     avg: 2879     median: 2878.5 (18%)     max: 2974 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
298 Points (90%)
210 Points (63%)
min: 272     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (85%)     max: 291 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
26.4 Points (34%)
17.7 Points (23%)
33.5 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.5 Points (87%)
2.2 Points (55%)
3.4 Points (85%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8122 Points (49%)
6210 Points (38%)
8026 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
46166 Points (33%)
44220 Points (32%)
51950 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
57417 Points (40%)
94035 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8876 Points (11%)
14485 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
83.8 s (1%)
117.2 s (1%)
62.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.1 s (1%)
4.1 s (1%)
2.4 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
14038 Points (22%)
7147 Points (11%)
16585 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
64613 MIPS (37%)
41522 MIPS (24%)
min: 75558     avg: 80313     median: 80312.5 (46%)     max: 85067 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7566 MIPS (90%)
5466 MIPS (65%)
min: 7412     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (94%)     max: 8235 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
137.8 fps (48%)
91.5 fps (32%)
169.3 fps (59%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
347 fps (80%)
258 fps (60%)
344 fps (79%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.5 fps (34%)
13.5 fps (24%)
min: 22.1     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (41%)     max: 24.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
0.8 GB/s (0%)
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.5 GB/s (33%)
8.7 GB/s (23%)
15.3 GB/s (40%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 R5 7600 +
352 Seconds (4%)
min: 266     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (4%)     max: 299 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
219 Seconds (2%)
290.2 Seconds (2%)
min: 169     avg: 178     median: 178 (1%)     max: 187 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
0.6 sec (12%)
min: 0.4152     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4479 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15993 Points (34%)
13359 Points (28%)
16892 Points (36%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.8 s (1%)
7.8 s (2%)
7.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.8 s (1%)
16.9 s (1%)
15.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
351 s (2%)
703 s (3%)
337.6 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
57236 Points (50%)
97391 Points (85%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23854 Points (64%)
15367 Points (42%)
min: 30767     avg: 32947     median: 32947 (89%)     max: 35127 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
71688 Points (58%)
89617 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
71496 Points (58%)
89287 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74053 Points (62%)
91846 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13346 Points (34%)
25510 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21144 Points (38%)
min: 30333     avg: 31839     median: 31839 (57%)     max: 33345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9819 Points (41%)
8468 Points (36%)
min: 11975     avg: 13037     median: 13036.5 (55%)     max: 14098 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2634 Points (71%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
14288 Points (56%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2088 Points (88%)
1575 Points (66%)
min: 1856     avg: 1934     median: 1920 (81%)     max: 2027 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
11095 Points (20%)
7681 Points (14%)
min: 12073     avg: 13013     median: 12715 (23%)     max: 14252 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2005 Points (9%)
1543 Points (7%)
1938 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10745 Points (34%)
7679 Points (24%)
13888 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8453 Points (84%)
6836 Points (68%)
9097 Points (91%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
44221 Points (49%)
30191 Points (33%)
54840 Points (60%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
470 ms (1%)
654 ms (1%)
min: 487     avg: 504     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 520 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
282 Points (81%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
345 Points (72%)
255 Points (53%)
353 Points (74%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2216 Points (85%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 7600 +
134.5 Watt (23%)
236 Watt (41%)
218 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 7600 +
134.2 Watt (24%)
204 Watt (37%)
207 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 7600 +
81.5 Watt (54%)
121.6 Watt (80%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 R5 7600 +
17.4 Points per Watt (13%)
7.7 Points per Watt (6%)
14.4 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7600 → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11400F → 79% n=37

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D → 111% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 21. 12:42:40

#0 checking url part for id 15006 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13219 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15064 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15006 +0.017s ... 0.042s

#8 got single benchmarks 15006 +0.009s ... 0.052s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13219 +0.017s ... 0.068s

#10 got single benchmarks 13219 +0.008s ... 0.077s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 15064 +0.011s ... 0.088s

#12 got single benchmarks 15064 +0.01s ... 0.099s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.099s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.439s ... 0.538s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.538s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)