Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U vs AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 vs AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 5300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (not to be confused with the A4-5300, a CPU released in 2012) is a Lucienne family processor designed for use in thin and light laptops. The R3 5300U integrates four cores (quad core) based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.6 (guaranteed base clock) to 3.8 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT for a total of 8 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process. Compared to the older and similar Ryzen 3 4300U (Renoir), the Ryzen 3 5300U offers SMT and slightly higher clock speeds. The faster Ryzen 3 5400U is based on the newer Zen 3 architecture. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information on the Lucienne / Renoir architecture.

In addition to the four CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics adapter with 6 CUs at up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 4 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip.

Performance

The average 5300U in our database matches the Core i5-11300H, the Core i7-11375H and also the Ryzen 5 4500U in multi-thread performance, making it an outstandingly good chip as far as sub-US$700 laptops go.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 3 series chip has a default TDP of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. By going for the lowest value possible, it will be possible to build a passively cooled system around the chip, however, most companies will do the opposite to achieve higher performance levels.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U is built with TSMC's 7 nm manufacturing process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 H 260

► remove from comparison AMD AMD R7 H 260

The AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 is a high-end notebook processor from the Hawk Point series with 8 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 16 threads simultaneously. At release, the CPU is only available in China and is technically practically identical to the older AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS or Ryzen 7 7840HS (slower AI engine).

The performance of the second-fastest model in the Hawk Point series should only be slightly behind the Ryzen 9 7940HS (+100 - 200 MHz clock, e.g. only 2% slower Turbo). As a result, the performance at 54W TDP should also be comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W, 32 MB L3) and thus clearly ahead of the old top model AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX resp. 6980HS (with lower TDP).

The chip integrates a modern RDNA 3-based graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7GHz including AV1 video engine. Furthermore, a Xilinx FPGA-based XDNA AI accelerator is also integrated, which is now clocked higher. Hawk Point offers 2x USB 4 (40 Gbps), 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support).

The Hawk Point series is a single chip (unlike the Dragon Range 7045HX series) and is manufactured at TSMC using the modern 4nm FinFET process.

AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8645HS

The Ryzen 5 8645HS is an upper mid-range processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new chip; instead, the 8645HS is a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640HS with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8645HS was brought to life in Q4 2023 and it has 6 SMT-enabled Zen 4 cores (12 threads) running at 4.3 GHz to 5.0 GHz. The Radeon 760M iGPU is responsible for carrying out 3D calculations and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8645HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a super-fast DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 RAM controller. USB 4 (and thus Thunderbolt) is supported natively and so is PCIe 4. In fact, 20 PCIe 4 lanes are on offer; data transfer speeds of up to 7.8 GB/s will be possible provided a sufficiently fast NVMe SSD is used.

Systems powered by this Ryzen 5 series chip are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that the APU is not overclockable and neither will you be able to replace it with a faster one as it gets soldered to the motherboard permanently (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8645HX is an 7640HS in disguise, it is safe to expect the APU to be about as fast as the Ryzen 9 5900HX, Ryzen 7 6800H, Ryzen 7 7736U and also the Core i5-12500H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While this is not the best graphics adapter for gaming as it's only just fast enough for low quality settings and resolutions such as 1600 x 900, it will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it also HW-encodes and HW-decodes the most widely used video codecs such as AV1, HEVC and AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8645HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between improving battery life and giving the system they are working on more oomph. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

This Ryzen 5 series APU is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 5300UAMD Ryzen 7 H 260AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
CodenameLucienne-U (Zen 2)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U1.8 - 4.3 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U « 2.6 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS « 4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2600 - 3800 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz4300 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB8 MB6 MB
L3 Cache4 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
6 / 12
6 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP25 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP6FP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 5300U
27.7 pt (46%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 8645HS
38.5 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
99.7 Points (56%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
727 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4772     avg: 5212     median: 5341 (5%)     max: 5522 Points
13220 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1102     avg: 1115     median: 1115 (47%)     max: 1129 Points
1714 Points (72%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 431     avg: 436     median: 436 (47%)     max: 441 Points
668 Points (73%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1883     avg: 2039     median: 2067 (5%)     max: 2138 Points
5121 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 832     avg: 884     median: 906 (6%)     max: 915 Points
2094 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 166     avg: 168.7     median: 170 (47%)     max: 170 Points
270 Points (75%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.3 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.9 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5118 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
22139 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
35101 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8723 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
89.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
321.8 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
10 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2551 Points (4%)
6695 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 19170     avg: 21836     median: 21971 (13%)     max: 24366 MIPS
55608 MIPS (32%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3755     avg: 3971     median: 3960 (47%)     max: 4198 MIPS
6190 MIPS (73%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
121.8 fps (41%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
281.5 fps (65%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.87     avg: 6.4     median: 6.5 (11%)     max: 6.74 fps
17.2 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (16%)
1 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (16%)
1.5 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.1 GB/s (13%)
11 GB/s (29%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 968     avg: 1069     median: 1069 (14%)     max: 1170 Seconds
389 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 524     avg: 562     median: 544 (4%)     max: 617 Seconds
241 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.654     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.664 sec
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
7931 Points (17%)
14055 Points (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7 s (2%)
8.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
20.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
366 s (2%)
718 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6183     avg: 7499     median: 7958 (20%)     max: 8356 Points
18811 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7689     avg: 8517     median: 8604 (22%)     max: 9257 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10839     avg: 11948     median: 12075 (22%)     max: 12929 Points
21505 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3541     avg: 3683     median: 3587 (15%)     max: 3920 Points
8081 Points (34%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2570 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
10882 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1040     avg: 1063     median: 1070 (42%)     max: 1080 Points
1915 Points (75%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3730     avg: 3976     median: 4008 (7%)     max: 4191 Points
9420 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1049     avg: 1063     median: 1062.5 (5%)     max: 1076 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4079     avg: 4107     median: 4106.5 (13%)     max: 4134 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4560 Points (46%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
16261 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
16771 Points (30%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4096 Points (53%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
18122 Points (28%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4432 Points (66%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 878     avg: 891     median: 890 (1%)     max: 906 ms
547 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
52372 Points (38%)
93292 Points (68%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 144.3     avg: 147.3     median: 147.3 (40%)     max: 150.3 Points
248 Points (68%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 187.3     avg: 191.9     median: 187.4 (34%)     max: 201 Points
295 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 932     avg: 934     median: 933.5 (35%)     max: 935 Points
1765 Points (66%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 30.2     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (6%)     max: 43 Watt
114.2 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 33     avg: 40.1     median: 40.7 (7%)     max: 46.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.11     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 3.51 Watt
19.5 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.43     avg: 16.9     median: 5.9 (7%)     max: 39.4 Watt
11 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 19.7     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (17%)     max: 25.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 5300U → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 12. 14:39:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12985 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19849 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16403 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755002388s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:18:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12985 +0.003s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 12985 +0.008s ... 0.021s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 19849 +0.001s ... 0.022s

#11 got single benchmarks 19849 +0s ... 0.022s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16403 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#13 got single benchmarks 16403 +0.005s ... 0.031s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.071s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)