The AMD Ryzen 3 1300X is a desktop quad-core processor with 4 cores and no Hyperthreading / SMT (4 threads only). Mid 2017 it is the fastest Ryzen 3 quad-core CPU. The TDP is specified at 65 Watt and the CPU cores clock with up to 3.9 GHz (XFR 2 cores, 3.7 GHz without XFR). A detailed review can be found here.
The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is a desktop APU that was announced in early 2018. It is the fastest Raven Ridge APU at that time and features all four Zen cores (8 threads due to SMT support) clocked at 3.6 - 3.9 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics card with 11 CUs (all of the 704 Shaders on the chip) clocked at up to 1250 MHz. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR-2933. The TDP is specified at 65 Watt and the CPU, GPU and memory are unlocked for overclocking. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.
The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G is a dual-core SoC designed for embedded systems that was announced in March 2019. It is similar to the Ryzen 3 3200U (or the 2200U with slightly increased clock speed) and based on the first generation of the Zen architecture. The Ryzen features two Zen cores with support for the thread-doubling SMT tech, clocked at 2.6 GHz - 3.5 GHz. The built-in Radeon RX Vega 3 iGPU has 3 CUs (192 unified shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. The default TDP is 15 W which makes the Ryzen a good fit for thin mid-range laptops.
In comparison to the faster Ryzen 3000 CPUs, the 3200U and therefore the R1606G is not using the newer Zen+ microarchitecture and is still manufactured in 14nm. Compared to the old Ryzen 3 2200U, the 3200U and R1606G therefore only offers a 100 MHz higher clock speed.
The R1606G is compatible with single-channel or dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM. Please go to our Raven Ridge launch article for details on the architecture and more.
Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G → 79%n=13
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 21. 12:27:08
#0 checking url part for id 9304 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9894 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 14126 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.04s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9304 +0.022s ... 0.061s
#8 got single benchmarks 9304 +0.011s ... 0.073s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9894 +0.022s ... 0.094s
#10 got single benchmarks 9894 +0.016s ... 0.111s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14126 +0.003s ... 0.114s
#12 got single benchmarks 14126 +0.009s ... 0.122s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.122s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.405s ... 0.527s
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card