Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q

The Nvidia Quadro T1000 with Max-Q Design is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). Compared to the consumer GTX 1650, the Quadro T1000 features less CUDA cores / shaders (768 versus 896). The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. Compared to the normal Quadro T1000, the Max-Q variants are clocked lower and work in a more efficient state. Currently, we know of two variants with different clock speeds and power consumptions (35 and 40 W).

ModelShaderTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro T1000 Mobile7685013951455
Quadro T1000 Max-Q7684012301455
Quadro T1000 Max-Q768357951455
Quadro T2000 Mobile10246015751785
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile8965013951560

The Quadro T1000 is a mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU116 chip). Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the T1000 integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. Due to the same boost clock as the mobile T1000, the Max-Q variants can perform similar with sufficient cooling.

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

Thanks to the low power consumption, the Max-Q T2000 GPU can be used in thin and light laptops. The used TU116 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.

NVIDIA Quadro P4000

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro P4000

The Nvidia Quadro P4000 is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. There is currently no consumer counterpart and the GPU is sitting between the Quadro P3000 (GTX 1060) and Quadro P5000 (GTX 1070). It is equipped with 1792 shaders and should therefore use the same GP104 chip from the P5000 (2048 shaders). It has 8 GB GDDR-VRAM at the same bandwidth and has the similar 100-Watt TGP according to Nvidia.

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-QNVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P Series
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro P5200 compare 2560 @ 1.32 - 1.57 GHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 compare 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 compare 2048 @ 1.16 - 1.51 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q compare 2048 @ 1.1 - 1.37 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 1792 @ 1.2 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1.11 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 compare 1792 @ 0.71 - 1.23 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 compare 1280 @ 1.09 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q compare 1280 @ 1.08 - 1.24 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1.49 - 1.52 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1.18 - 1.44 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenameN19P-Q1N17E-Q3
ArchitectureTuringPascal
Pipelines768 - unified1792 - unified
Core Speed795 / 1230 - 1455 (Boost) MHz1202 - 1228 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz6006 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB16 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption35 - 40 Watt73.4 Watt
technology12 nm16 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement27.05.2019 11.01.2017
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro P4000
5.6 pt (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
3825 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3960 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
369407 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
18726 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
53834 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
10158 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
12259 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
81998 Points (10%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
12346 Points (17%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
15433 Points (13%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
36260 Points (11%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
42370 Points (24%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3DMark 06
29155 Points (38%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
53 fps (32%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
49.9 fps (28%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
50.9 fps (39%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
19.7 fps (23%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
57.8 fps (44%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
52.2 fps (56%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
59.2 fps (28%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
48.4 fps (25%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
117.1 fps (29%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
83.1 fps (12%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
67.2 fps (15%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
39.4 fps (10%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
77.9 fps (21%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
10.3 fps (9%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
97.1 fps (39%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
115.2 fps (19%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
93.6 fps (16%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6831 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
105.6 fps (37%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
107.2 fps (6%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
209.8 fps (24%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
318 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
408.4 fps (24%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
1114 fps (9%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1847 Samples/s (8%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
3564 Samples/s (6%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
8609 Points (9%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
80.8 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
99.5 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.4 fps per Watt (34%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro P4000 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Quadro P4000:
70.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
61.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
58.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
54  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
66.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
55.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
45.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
43.7  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro P4000:
119.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
112.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
91  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
87.1  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
115.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
103.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
76.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
65.5  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
122.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
116.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
89.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
85.7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
159.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
113.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
77.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
41.1  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
153.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
106.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
96.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
84.5  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
236.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
184.1  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
151.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
63.3  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
67.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
61.1  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
59.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
44.9  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro P4000:
196.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
174.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
162.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
96  fps
NVIDIA Quadro P4000lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III70.361.658.854
Civilization VI66.755.245.1343.7
Doom119.5112.49187.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider115.9103.276.865.5
Star Wars Battlefront122.5116.489.285.7
The Witcher 3159.7113.677.241.09
GRID: Autosport153.8106.396.984.5
Total War: Rome II236.7184.1151.463.3
Company of Heroes 267.661.159.744.94
BioShock Infinite196.9174.4162.496
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
5

1
7
2

3
5
2

4
6






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 15. 22:59:23

#0 checking url part for id 9888 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7666 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:35:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.095s ... 0.097s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.097s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.097s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9888 +0.023s ... 0.12s

#8 got single benchmarks 9888 +0.006s ... 0.126s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7666 +0.018s ... 0.144s

#10 got single benchmarks 7666 +0.009s ... 0.152s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.152s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.168s ... 0.321s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.321s

#14 Got 40 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.325s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.325s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.007s ... 0.331s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.019s ... 0.351s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.351s

#19 return log +0.035s ... 0.386s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)