, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 1000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably the same chip like the consumer GeForce GT 540M). Compared to the 5010M, the 1000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations. According to the clock rates, the Quadro 1000M should be positioned between the GT 540M and 550M.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 1000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 1000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 1000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

The Quadro 1000M is specified at 45 Watt TDP and therefore suited for 15.6" laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro M1200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1200

The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M1200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M. The Quadro M1200M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M1000M (950M based).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The performance of the Quadro M1200 is on a level to the previous generation M2000M which is also based on the 960M. In games it is comparable to the GTX 960M although the driver support is not optimized for gaming.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M1200 is rated for the same TGP of 45 Watt (32.5 Watt TDP) and therefore a bit lower than the M2000M with 55 Watt TGP.

NVIDIA Quadro 1000MNVIDIA Quadro M1200
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermiN17P-Q1
ArchitectureFermiMaxwell
Pipelines96 - unified640 - unified
Core Speed700 MHz991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Shader Speed1400 MHz
Memory Speed900 MHz5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB4096 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
technology40 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement22.02.2011 13.01.2017
Transistors1870 Million
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1200
10.1 pt (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1290 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
240298 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
42129 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 12632     avg: 14705     median: 13600 (18%)     max: 17884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 26860     avg: 27557     median: 27557 (14%)     max: 28254 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3759     avg: 3846     median: 3878 (10%)     max: 3900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4118     avg: 4142     median: 4141.5 (8%)     max: 4165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
63463 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1064 Points (3%)
min: 5513     avg: 5515     median: 5514.5 (13%)     max: 5516 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
943 Points (2%)
min: 5105     avg: 5310     median: 5310 (9%)     max: 5515 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
4566 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
3679 Points (3%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
40779 Points (42%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
21603 Points (11%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
16583 Points (24%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3DMark 06
min: 7827     avg: 8312     median: 8509 (16%)     max: 8599 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
26109 Points (49%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
27.7 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
30.1 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.9 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
10.1 fps (2%)
28.1 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
13.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
43.9 fps (31%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
16.2 fps (27%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
44.2 fps (74%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
25 fps (30%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
56.4 fps (68%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
8.3 fps (35%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
22 fps (92%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
33.5 fps (25%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.2 fps (43%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
36 fps (39%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.8 fps (62%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
11.2 fps (5%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
46.7 fps (22%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
15 fps (18%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
53.4 fps (65%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 69.01     avg: 72.5     median: 70 (30%)     max: 78.37 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 34.18     avg: 34.9     median: 34.7 (12%)     max: 36 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 22.17     avg: 24.8     median: 26 (11%)     max: 26.2 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 17.49     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (11%)     max: 18 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 32.07     avg: 34.4     median: 33.7 (14%)     max: 37.29 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 3.78     avg: 3.8     median: 3.9 (10%)     max: 3.9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 45     avg: 46     median: 46.1 (26%)     max: 46.97 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 45.75     avg: 46.2     median: 45.9 (16%)     max: 47 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
46 fps (14%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6771 (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
26.2 fps (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
102 fps (43%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.79     avg: 108     median: 108.2 (30%)     max: 113.54 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 656     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (8%)     max: 979 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 852     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (4%)     max: 1562 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
388 (1%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 74.8     avg: 87.5     median: 87.5 (19%)     max: 100.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 327% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
79  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
66  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
37  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
34  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
12  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
88.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
49.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
28.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
23.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
9.9  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
74  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
63  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
35  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
29  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
11  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
73.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
26.3 29 fps ~ 28 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
13 fps  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
93.3  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
50.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
26.2  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
189 224.7 ~ 207 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
130.8 137 ~ 134 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
113.1 125 ~ 119 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
42.6 47 ~ 45 fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 1000M:
140.5  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
54  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
34.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 1000M:
12.7  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 1000M:
450  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
192  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
132  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 1000M:
73  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 1000M:
64.2  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
50.3  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
41.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 1000M:
25.1  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
100%
Quadro 1000M:
121  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
100  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 1000M:
53.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 05. 01:06:57

#0 checking url part for id 2437 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7704 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 03 Aug 2021 17:21:24 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.055s ... 0.055s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.055s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2437 +0.024s ... 0.079s

#8 got single benchmarks 2437 +0.007s ... 0.087s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7704 +0.004s ... 0.09s

#10 got single benchmarks 7704 +0.009s ... 0.099s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.099s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.121s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.121s

#14 Got 47 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.128s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.128s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.13s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.142s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.142s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.145s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)