Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver N6000 vs Intel Core i9-9900T vs Intel Core i5-9600K

Intel Pentium Silver N6000

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N6000

The Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 3.3 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N6000 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process, the same process as Ice Lake.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the four CPU cores, the SoC integrates a 32 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 850 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4x memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N6000 in our database proves to be an OK entry-level processor, as of late 2022, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U. Yes, the chip is a whole lot slower than the latest Ryzen 3 and Core i3 processors, but it will at least let you run your day-to-day apps without annoying slowdowns.

The Asus Vivobook 13 Slate is among the fastest systems built around the N6000 that we know of, thanks to the long-term CPU power limit of 10 W. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

Like nearly all other N-class Intel processors, the Pentium N6000 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as the long-term power limit). This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The SoC is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-9900T

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9900T

The Intel Core i9-9900T is a high end power efficient desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. Compared to the similar named top model Core i9-9900K, the 9900T offers lower clock speeds (2.1 - 4.4 GHz versus 3.6 - 5 GHz) and a reduced TDP of 35 versus 95 Watt. It still offers all 8 cores and 16 threads and is intended for small chassis or laptops.

The performance is clearly behind the Core i9-9900K and more in the realm of the older 6-core Coffee Lake CPUs.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel Core i5-9600K

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-9600K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking and integrates 6 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 6 threads) clocked at 3.7 - 4.6 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard. It is manufactured in the second iteration of the improved 14nm process (14nm++).

Compared to the older Core i5-8600K, the 9600K offers about 10 to 15% higher performance. As the CPU still offers 6 cores and threads, the improvements are mostly due to the higher clock speeds. As a fast mid range desktop CPU, the i5-9600K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.15 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 150 Watt and higher.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver N6000Intel Core i9-9900TIntel Core i5-9600K
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameJasper LakeCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-R
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 « 1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T « 2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K « 3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock1100 - 3300 MHz2100 - 4400 MHz3700 - 4600 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB2 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB16 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 166 / 6
TDP6 Watt35 Watt95 Watt
Technology10 nm14++ nm14++ nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1338FCLGA1151FCLGA1151
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3 x 8, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (350 - 850 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
$439 U.S.$262 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N6000
21.9 pt (30%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900T
32.7 pt (45%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1610     avg: 1730     median: 1699 (2%)     max: 1911 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 653     avg: 669     median: 672.5 (29%)     max: 679 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 237     avg: 253.8     median: 255 (28%)     max: 268 Points
440 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 595     avg: 657     median: 650.5 (2%)     max: 730 Points
2626 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 266     avg: 292.5     median: 291 (2%)     max: 322 Points
1112 Points (7%)
1094 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 109     avg: 114.3     median: 113.7 (34%)     max: 121 Points
185 Points (56%)
193 Points (58%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3.47     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (5%)     max: 3.71 Points
12.4 Points (16%)
11 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.36     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (35%)     max: 1.46 Points
2.1 Points (52%)
2.2 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4057     avg: 4132     median: 4131.5 (25%)     max: 4206 Points
6758 Points (41%)
7205 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 9343     avg: 9643     median: 9642.5 (7%)     max: 9942 Points
31357 Points (23%)
33950 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
39494 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9318 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
727 s (9%)
162.1 s (2%)
176.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16.9 s (3%)
5.9 s (1%)
6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1330 Points (2%)
6109 Points (10%)
5903 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 8096     avg: 8953     median: 9212 (5%)     max: 9668 MIPS
35084 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2320     avg: 2934     median: 3305 (40%)     max: 3387 MIPS
4894 MIPS (59%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
18.4 fps (6%)
70.3 fps (25%)
68.8 fps (24%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
93.4 fps (22%)
173.4 fps (40%)
250 fps (58%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.55     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.76 fps
5.5 fps (10%)
8 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
0.8 GB/s (14%)
0.6 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.8 GB/s (7%)
4.6 GB/s (12%)
5.6 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
3786 Seconds (48%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1738     avg: 2163     median: 1935 (14%)     max: 3157 Seconds
422 Seconds (3%)
444.4 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.084     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.278 sec
1.9 sec (41%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3985 Points (8%)
10259 Points (22%)
10974 Points (23%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.5 s (4%)
8.8 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.6 s (1%)
17.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
895 s (4%)
481 s (2%)
421.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
37593 Points (33%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3134     avg: 3617     median: 3563 (10%)     max: 4155 Points
4080 Points (11%)
11938 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 30345     avg: 32921     median: 32921 (27%)     max: 35497 Points
12668 Points (10%)
78929 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 30120     avg: 32790     median: 32790 (27%)     max: 35460 Points
12727 Points (10%)
78531 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 38897     avg: 43994     median: 43993.5 (37%)     max: 49090 Points
13200 Points (11%)
80235 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2524     avg: 2897     median: 2947 (7%)     max: 3220 Points
3268 Points (8%)
9031 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3838     avg: 4315     median: 4063 (7%)     max: 5296 Points
13365 Points (24%)
13701 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1161     avg: 1301     median: 1259.5 (5%)     max: 1523 Points
5870 Points (25%)
6071 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 720     avg: 728     median: 727 (31%)     max: 736 Points
1206 Points (51%)
1217 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1784     avg: 1912     median: 1915 (3%)     max: 2004 Points
5888 Points (11%)
5855 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 723     avg: 725     median: 724.5 (3%)     max: 726 Points
1193 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1881     avg: 1912     median: 1911.5 (6%)     max: 1942 Points
5875 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3188 Points (32%)
5381 Points (54%)
5916 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8341 Points (9%)
23223 Points (25%)
23810 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1388     avg: 1412     median: 1405 (2%)     max: 1451 ms
878 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
293.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25840     avg: 32251     median: 34145.5 (31%)     max: 34874 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
104.2 Points (30%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 138.4     avg: 143.8     median: 146 (30%)     max: 147 Points
197 Points (41%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 440     avg: 469     median: 469 (18%)     max: 498 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.3     avg: 12     median: 12 (2%)     max: 12.6 Watt
65.2 Watt (11%)
145.9 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.5     avg: 13.3     median: 12.9 (2%)     max: 16.4 Watt
57 Watt (10%)
134 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.37     avg: 5.4     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 8.08 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 19.6     avg: 22.3     median: 20.6 (15%)     max: 26.7 Points per Watt
19.5 Points per Watt (15%)
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N6000 → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900T → 211% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9600K → 251% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 30. 15:32:56

#0 checking url part for id 13075 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12027 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11231 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:33:54 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13075 +0.014s ... 0.036s

#8 got single benchmarks 13075 +0.022s ... 0.059s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12027 +0.015s ... 0.073s

#10 got single benchmarks 12027 +0.007s ... 0.08s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11231 +0.002s ... 0.083s

#12 got single benchmarks 11231 +0.007s ... 0.09s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.09s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.349s ... 0.438s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.438s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)