Notebookcheck

Notebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 500 Euros

Daniel Schmidt (translated by Andreas Osthoff), 02/02/2018

Update June 2018. Upper class. Up until a few years ago, high-end smartphones were usually in the price range of between 500 and 600 USD/Euros, but this segment is now occupied by upper class models and older high-end smartphones. The latter might not be new anymore, but are still good alternatives.

Upper-class smartphones are located in the price range of between mainstream and high-end models and are targeted towards users who are not willing to pay more than 700 Euros (~$870) for an expensive high-end phone, but still want good performance, good cameras, and nice build quality.

The price range of up to 500 Euros (~$620) includes both powerful upper-class models as well as old high-end smartphones. The latter are an interesting alternative, because the specifications are usually still very good and often receive at least one major update. The following rankings might be interesting for you as well:

Here you will find a Top 10 ranking of smartphones under 500 Euros (~$620), which have been reviewed by Notebookcheck within the last 24 months. The market is constantly changing, so we are also looking forward to getting tips about good deals and other notes in the comments. You can sort the table by clicking the headers or via text filter (e.g. "Kirin").

Note: The cheapest street price at the time of the last revision of this article applies to the following list. The sales prices shown in the following table and in the price comparison with the individual articles are automatically updated daily and can therefore differ!

Best upper-class smartphones as of June 2018

Pos.DateRatingImageModelHeightWeightSizeResolutionOSBest Price
106/201792%Samsung Galaxy S8Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa
ARM Mali-G71 MP20
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
8 mm155 g5.8"2960x1440Android 7.0 Nougat
201/201891%OnePlus 5TOnePlus 5T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998)
Qualcomm Adreno 540
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.3 mm162 g6.01"2160x1080Android 7.1 Nougat
303/201691%Samsung Galaxy S7Samsung Galaxy S7
Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa
ARM Mali-T880 MP12
4 GB Memory, 32 GB UFS 2.0
7.9 mm152 g5.1"2560x1440Android 6.0 Marshmallow
402/201790%LG G6LG G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
Qualcomm Adreno 530
4 GB Memory, 32 GB UFS 2.0
7.9 mm163 g5.7"2880x1440Android 7.0 Nougat
504/201690%Apple iPhone SEApple iPhone SE
Apple A9
Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
7.6 mm113 g4"1136x640Apple iOS 9
612/201789%Sony Xperia XZ1 CompactSony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998)
Qualcomm Adreno 540
4 GB Memory, 32 GB UFS 2.0
9.3 mm143 g4.6"1280x720Android 8.0 Oreo
707/201789%Huawei P10Huawei P10
HiSilicon Kirin 960
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
6.98 mm144 g5.1"1920x1080Android 7.0 Nougat
805/201789%Huawei Mate 9Huawei Mate 9
HiSilicon Kirin 960
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
7.9 mm192 g5.9"1920x1080Android 7.0 Nougat
905/2018
New
89%Honor 10Honor 10
HiSilicon Kirin 970
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.7 mm153 g5.84"2280x1080Android 8.1 Oreo
1002/201889%Honor View 10Honor View 10
HiSilicon Kirin 970
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7 mm172 g5.99"2160x1080Android 8.0 Oreo

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Currently wanted: 
News Editor - Details here

Top 10 smartphones from the last months, current reviews listed first aktuelle Tests zuerst
Link: all tested devices in this segment, ordered by overall score

Editors' Comments

The Honor 9 drops out of the list this month, while its successor Honor 10 manages to secure P9. The OnePlus 5T stays in the ranking for now since it is still in stock at some retailers. Its successor is also very good, but a bit more expensive and therefore not relevant for this list. Xiaomi's Mi Mix 2s and the Huawei P20 on the other hand are getting closer to the 500 Euros mark and might make an entry over the next couple of weeks.

1st - Samsung Galaxy S8

Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Galaxy S8

The price of the Samsung Galaxy S8 dropped significantly. The original RRP was 799 Euros, but you can now get it for less than 500 Euros since the successor is available. You get a fast SoC, 4 GB RAM, and 64 GB UFS 2.1 storage, which is a powerful package for the high-end product. The displays were once again improved while the bezels are slimmer. Samsung also uses the 2.06:1 aspect ratio for the S8, so the diagonal size can grow without the need for a wider device. This is also the only significant difference between the two models. The Galaxy S8 uses a 5.8-inch Super-AMOLED panel and the S8+ a 6.2-inch screen. The battery capacities differ as well, but the S8+ cannot benefit from the additional juice during our tests. Still, the S8-series offers a great set of features: LTE Cat. 16, Bluetooth 5.0, storage expansion via microSD, IP68 certification, USB 3.1 with DisplayPort support, fingerprint and Iris scanner, as well as many more.

We did find some drawbacks like the bad position of the fingerprint scanner on the Plus model and the long-term construction site Bixby. The main camera is also identical to the predecessor. So if you want to save some money without making compromises on the camera quality, you can just get the Galaxy S7 Edge or Galaxy S7. The latter is even the only alternative if you prefer a display without an Edge-display.

Pricecompare

2nd – OnePlus 5T

OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T

The specifications of the OnePlus 5T are similar to that of the predecessor. However, not only is the display implemented the right way this time, but it now features a 2:1 aspect ratio. This means that the resolution has got a slight bump and the panel size is increased to 6.01 inches. The manufacturer offers two models. While one model is equipped with 6 GB of RAM and 64 GB of internal storage, the other one comes with 8 and 128 GB, respectively. It has a 3300 mAh battery and manages very good runtimes. We also liked the snappy OxygenOS as well as the good dual-camera during our review.

The lack of storage expansion as well as the protection against dust and water are minor issues. Still, it is definitely a high-end smartphone with a really good price-performance ratio. The smartphone is available from the manufacturer for 499 Euros (~$620; 6 GB of RAM, 64 GB of ROM).

Pricecompare

3rd – Samsung Galaxy S7

Samsung Galaxy S7
Samsung Galaxy S7

The Samsung Galaxy S7 is still a very powerful smartphone with decent memory equipment (4 GB of RAM and 32 GB of internal storage). The Super AMOLED display is comparatively small at 5.1 inches, but features a very high pixel density due to the high resolution. It is Samsung's last high-end smartphone without curved display edges, which has some advantages in terms of handling. The chassis is also dust and water resistant.

The sensor equipment is exemplary and is completed by a very accurate GPS module. The smartphone unfortunately does not feature a USB Type-C port, but it supports wireless charging and it is VR-ready. The camera is still excellent and hardly differs from the newer Galaxy S8. Samsung has already distributed the update to Android 7.1 Nougat last year, another one to Oreo is supposed to follow.

Pricecompare

4th – LG G6

LG G6
LG G6

Since customers did not quite accept the predecessor, LG has completely revised the concept of its flagship model and created a great product. The LG G6 uses an aspect ratio of 2:1 and the display size has increased to 5.7 inches. Nevertheless, it still sits comfortably in the hand. It is the first time that the G series uses a fixed battery. On the other hand, the smartphone is now dust and waterproof and also meets other specifications of the MIL-STG-810G military standard. Thus, the G6 is really robust.

The SoC, a high-end model of the last year, still delivers very good performance. In addition, the phone comes with 4 GB of RAM and 32 GB of UFS-2.0 storage. The cameras have been improved significantly and are really good now. Furthermore, the display is convincing. It already supports HDR10 and Dolby Vision. The only complaint is that not all components are high-end and features such as wireless-charging, larger storage and better audio chip are not available in Germany.

Pricecompare

5th – Apple iPhone SE

Apple iPhone SE
Apple iPhone SE

With the iPhone SE, Apple has ventured to create a powerful new edition of the iPhone 5s and put the big iPhone's up-to-date hardware into an extremely compact case. The user does not have to accept compromises in performance or features here, since the iPhone SE also uses the powerful Apple A9-SoC.

Among others, the smartphone could impress with a high-end chassis, a great GPS receiver, good battery runtimes and a display with precise colors in our test. However, the latter has quite a high black value. Moreover, the NFC chip remains reserved for Apple Pay as in other Apple products.

The only disadvantage of the device is that there is only a 16 GB and a 64 GB variant. The current iOS 11 is available for the smartphone.

If you prefer a bigger iPhone for less than 500 Euros, you should have a look at the iPhone 6s.

Pricecompare

Pricecompare

6th – Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact

Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact

The Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact uses a classic 16:9 screen with a 720p resolution. This does not sound like a lot, but it is entirely sufficient for sharp images on the 4.6-inch screen. The smartphone is powered by Qualcomm's current flagship SoC in combination with 4 GB of RAM as well as 32 GB of fast UFS storage, which can be expanded via a microSD card. The smartphone is also protected against dust and water according to IP68.

We also like the long battery runtimes, a good camera, and the current operating system Android 8.0 Oreo during our review. It is unfortunate that Sony only includes a weak power adapter, so the supported quick-charge technology cannot be utilized.

Pricecompare

Quality journalism is made possible by advertising. We show the least amount of ads whenever possible. We intentionally show more ads when an adblocker is used. Please, switch off ad blockers.

7th – Huawei P10

Huawei P10
Huawei P10

The Huawei P10 has a 5.1-inch Full HD display, which is surrounded by a compact and elegant design. It is powered by a fast Kirin-SoC, which features good communication capabilities and fast LTE Cat. 12. The Leica dual camera takes really good pictures and only reveals a weakness during the recording of videos during the review. The battery runtime is also very long.

64 GB of internal storage is typical for a 2017 flagship smartphone and can be expanded via a microSD card. The performance of the card reader, however, is just average. Another problem is that the P10 uses older eMMC storage as well as much faster UFS. The update to Google Android 8.0 Oreo is already in beta testing.

Pricecompare

8th – Huawei Mate 9

Huawei Mate 9
Huawei Mate 9

The Mate series is known for a big display and a large battery, and the Huawei Mate 9 is no exception. It has a 5.9-inch IPS panel and a 4000 mAh battery, but you also get a fast SoC as well as good memory equipment. Similar to the P-series, it gets a Leica dual-camera, which takes great pictures. The Mate 9 is also one of the few smartphones with an infrared transmitter, so the smartphone can be used to control your home entertainment system. The slow WLAN was the only negative aspect during our review. It gets regular updates and Android 8.0 Oreo is already available.

Pricecompare

9th - Honor 10

Honor 10
Honor 10

The Honor 10 is a really good smartphone. It has a good and bright IPS display, which is pretty big, but not as gigantic compared to many of its rivals. The resolution of 2280 x 1080 pixels ensures a crisp picture. You also get a good camera, long battery runtimes, and a fast smartphone. Neither the system performance nor the design or the haptics suggest this is a device for "just" 400 Euros.

We also liked the strong GPS performance, but there are some drawbacks as well. Despite the Kirin 970 SoC, you only get LTE Cat. 13 and the storage expansion via microSD was removed. We also noticed some overheating problems under sustained workloads.

Pricecompare

10th – Honor View 10

Honor View 10
Honor View 10

The Honor View 10 is the biggest and most expensive from Huawei's subsidiary so far and offers some features otherwise reserved for the much more expensive Mate 10 Pro. Among others, this includes LTE Cat. 18 as well as dual-VoLTE. The View 10 is powered by a real high-end SoC in combination with 6 GB RAM as well as 128 GB internal UFS 2.1 storage, which can also be expanded via microSD card. Honor also still implements a stereo jack. Bluetooth is limited to the 4.2 standard, but you get aptX for high-resolution audio streaming in return. We also liked the battery and the camera in our review.

The occasional overheating issues were less convincing, but they only occur when you really stress the components. The WLAN module is also comparatively slow and the location performance could be better. Still, the Honor View 10 offers a strong overall package for an RRP of 499 Euros.

Pricecompare

Best Smartphones under 500 Euros in Comparison

Size Comparison

Measurement Results

Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5.6 (2.8, 2.8)
4.8 (2, 2.8)
0.9 (0.42, 0.46)
39.6 (19.2, 20.4)
31 (17, 14)
56 (27, 29)
39.6 (19.6, 20)
57 (14, 43)
43.2 (18.8, 24.4)
53.6 (26, 27.6)
Response Time Black / White *
3.2 (2, 1.2)
4.8 (2.8, 2)
0.9 (0.46, 0.44)
23.2 (11.6, 11.6)
22 (11, 11)
46 (29, 17)
16 (5.2, 10.8)
30 (7, 23)
29.6 (15.2, 14.4)
25.6 (8.4, 17.2)
PWM Frequency
250
242.7
238.1 (100)
2410 (35)
2358 (25)
Screen
Brightness middle
566
425
350
646
603
566
547
696
555
530
Brightness
564
423
351
611
579
560
556
680
537
523
Brightness Distribution
94
92
98
89
93
98
86
93
94
88
Black Level *
0.23
0.88
0.53
0.43
0.42
0.39
0.35
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.7
2.1
2.04
4.5
1.8
4.6
4.8
4.3
2.3
2.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.4
3.4
3.25
8.3
3.5
9.4
8.8
9.4
6
5.5
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
2.5
1.63
6
2.3
6.5
4.5
4.8
3.9
2.2
Gamma
2.15 112%
2.32 103%
2.07 116%
2.27 106%
2.21 109%
2.14 112%
2.39 100%
2.33 103%
2.19 110%
2.25 107%
CCT
6335 103%
6455 101%
6391 102%
7996 81%
6955 93%
8189 79%
7194 90%
7255 90%
6212 105%
6598 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
86.86
67.74
62.13
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87
99.35
99.05
96.74
Contrast
2809
685
1068
1272
1657
1423
1514
Heat
Maximum Upper Side *
36.7
36.1
38.3
33.7
44.2
39.7
44.6
44.4
35.9
37.4
Maximum Bottom *
37.5
33.7
37.6
31.9
42.8
37.7
40.9
41.6
36.4
35
Idle Upper Side *
26.7
26.2
29.7
30.3
30.9
34.1
35.6
33.7
34.9
28.8
Idle Bottom *
26.2
24.7
28.7
28.3
26.8
28.6
29.7
29.2
31.1
24.9
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle
1667
1754
1810
1789
1274
2655
1540
1538
1162
1671
WiFi v1.3
719
718
456
692
673
736
966
758
663
679
Load
264
257
242
252
207
266
176
219
216
305
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *
0.78
0.58
0.68
0.62
0.54
0.58
0.83
0.78
1.12
1.05
Idle Average *
1.1
1.44
1.02
1.43
1.26
1.76
2.1
2.13
2.26
2.36
Idle Maximum *
1.16
1.53
1.14
1.48
1.4
1.81
2.18
2.17
2.3
2.41
Load Average *
4.15
3.17
4.73
5.52
2.45
6.33
6.57
6.32
5.14
4.93
Load Maximum *
5.12
8.54
7.16
10.47
6.46
9.18
9.32
6.49
7.89
9.04

* ... smaller is better

Benchmarks

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
171884 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172124 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
127902 Points ∼56%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
151751 Points ∼66%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
126969 Points ∼55%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
150208 Points ∼65%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
140084 Points ∼61%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
124087 Points ∼54%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
174272 Points ∼76%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
173653 Points ∼75%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
214815 Points ∼80%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
158926 Points ∼60%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
170015 Points ∼64%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
205297 Points ∼77%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6711 Points ∼23%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6670 Points ∼23%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4369 Points ∼15%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
6541 Points ∼23%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6521 Points ∼23%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6445 Points ∼22%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6610 Points ∼23%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6785 Points ∼23%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1997 Points ∼34%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1962 Points ∼33%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1831 Points ∼31%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1915 Points ∼32%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1899 Points ∼32%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1866 Points ∼31%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1890 Points ∼32%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1918 Points ∼32%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2440 Points ∼67%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3031 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2010 Points ∼55%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1961 Points ∼54%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1649 Points ∼45%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2675 Points ∼73%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2193 Points ∼60%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2123 Points ∼58%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2773 Points ∼76%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1906 Points ∼52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4923 Points ∼60%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5791 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3018 Points ∼37%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4121 Points ∼50%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4255 Points ∼52%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
6007 Points ∼73%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2816 Points ∼34%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2448 Points ∼30%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3573 Points ∼43%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1954 Points ∼24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4015 Points ∼63%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4816 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2715 Points ∼43%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3282 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3149 Points ∼49%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4705 Points ∼74%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2649 Points ∼42%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2367 Points ∼37%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3358 Points ∼53%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1943 Points ∼30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21543 Points ∼27%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21348 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
19944 Points ∼25%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
22335 Points ∼28%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13717 Points ∼17%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
22530 Points ∼29%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15341 Points ∼19%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15104 Points ∼19%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21070 Points ∼27%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14556 Points ∼18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
36347 Points ∼8%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
58097 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
33348 Points ∼7%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
32128 Points ∼7%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44059 Points ∼9%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
54415 Points ∼12%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35964 Points ∼8%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35626 Points ∼8%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
32674 Points ∼7%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22429 Points ∼5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31532 Points ∼15%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
42022 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
29015 Points ∼14%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
29276 Points ∼14%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
29538 Points ∼14%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
41396 Points ∼20%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
27692 Points ∼13%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
27364 Points ∼13%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29111 Points ∼14%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20022 Points ∼10%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
121 fps ∼7%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
113 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
84 fps ∼5%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
75 fps ∼4%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
80.3 fps ∼5%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
69 fps ∼4%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
80 fps ∼5%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
124 fps ∼7%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
125 fps ∼7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼13%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
53 fps ∼12%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
46 fps ∼10%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
59.2 fps ∼13%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
60 fps ∼13%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55 fps ∼12%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼13%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼13%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼13%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
62 fps ∼11%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
40 fps ∼7%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
38 fps ∼7%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps ∼7%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
53 fps ∼10%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 fps ∼5%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
34 fps ∼6%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼11%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
66 fps ∼12%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps ∼11%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
53 fps ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
27 fps ∼7%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
27 fps ∼7%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
58.1 fps ∼16%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
58 fps ∼16%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
32 fps ∼9%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps ∼10%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
50 fps ∼14%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55 fps ∼15%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1156 Points ∼68%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1329 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
957 Points ∼56%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1073 Points ∼63%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1226 Points ∼72%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1213 Points ∼72%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1077 Points ∼64%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1076 Points ∼63%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1316 Points ∼78%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1184 Points ∼70%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6096 Points ∼66%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6100 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1723 Points ∼19%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5138 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4175 Points ∼45%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5791 Points ∼63%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4115 Points ∼44%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3939 Points ∼43%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4397 Points ∼48%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3892 Points ∼42%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3039 Points ∼69%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3845 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2244 Points ∼51%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1930 Points ∼44%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1032 Points ∼23%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1501 Points ∼34%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2778 Points ∼63%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3850 Points ∼87%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3808 Points ∼86%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4276 Points ∼97%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5386 Points ∼52%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5872 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4217 Points ∼41%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3646 Points ∼35%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5179 Points ∼50%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5336 Points ∼52%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3830 Points ∼37%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3616 Points ∼35%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5882 Points ∼57%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5195 Points ∼51%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3277 Points ∼76%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3678 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1987 Points ∼46%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2496 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2287 Points ∼53%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2739 Points ∼64%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2621 Points ∼61%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2772 Points ∼64%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3374 Points ∼78%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3181 Points ∼74%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5370 Points ∼52%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6595 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3550 Points ∼34%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5152 Points ∼50%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
6421 Points ∼62%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6206 Points ∼60%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6299 Points ∼61%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7046 Points ∼68%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6724 Points ∼65%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6035 Points ∼59%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7739 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4826 Points ∼47%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5703 Points ∼56%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7496 Points ∼73%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7341 Points ∼72%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7403 Points ∼72%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8530 Points ∼83%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8306 Points ∼81%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
53.5 MB/s ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
53.6 MB/s ∼62%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
53.33 MB/s ∼61%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
50.17 MB/s ∼58%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
32.19 MB/s ∼37%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29.53 MB/s ∼34%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
65.06 MB/s ∼75%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
63.9 MB/s ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
72.33 MB/s ∼75%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
77.61 MB/s ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
73.3 MB/s ∼76%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
54.22 MB/s ∼56%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
53.97 MB/s ∼56%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 MB/s ∼84%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15.25 MB/s ∼9%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 MB/s ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
16.01 MB/s ∼10%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
16.58 MB/s ∼10%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
17.13 MB/s ∼10%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
152.31 MB/s ∼93%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.77 MB/s ∼5%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
163 MB/s ∼99%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
160 MB/s ∼97%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
127.17 MB/s ∼73%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
138.1 MB/s ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
85.9 MB/s ∼50%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
95.19 MB/s ∼55%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
113.29 MB/s ∼65%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
168.42 MB/s ∼97%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
94.69 MB/s ∼55%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
145.88 MB/s ∼84%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
144.3 MB/s ∼83%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
193.23 MB/s ∼89%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
203.4 MB/s ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
145.72 MB/s ∼67%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
122.85 MB/s ∼57%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
119.89 MB/s ∼55%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
189.83 MB/s ∼88%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
142.92 MB/s ∼66%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
192.12 MB/s ∼89%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
194.3 MB/s ∼90%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
792.86 MB/s ∼95%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
698.7 MB/s ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
483.82 MB/s ∼58%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
428.67 MB/s ∼52%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
667.75 MB/s ∼80%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
737.65 MB/s ∼89%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
594.23 MB/s ∼71%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
827.69 MB/s ∼100%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
810.3 MB/s ∼97%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12941 Points ∼26%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12509 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13161 Points ∼27%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
9113 Points ∼18%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16550 Points ∼33%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
11424 Points ∼23%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10236 Points ∼21%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11897 Points ∼24%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10965 Points ∼22%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6729 Points ∼14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1886.6 ms * ∼3%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3096 ms * ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2561.5 ms * ∼4%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2464.2 ms * ∼4%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1708.9 ms * ∼3%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3393.2 ms * ∼6%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3128.7 ms * ∼5%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2733.7 ms * ∼5%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3899 ms * ∼7%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6013 ms * ∼10%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
194 Points ∼24%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
181 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
166 Points ∼21%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
122 Points ∼15%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
186 Points ∼23%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
166 Points ∼21%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
136 Points ∼17%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
152 Points ∼19%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
182 Points ∼23%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
157 Points ∼19%
WebXPRT 3 - --- (sort by value)
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
69 Points ∼53%

* ... smaller is better

Read all 3 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Notebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 500 Euros
Daniel Schmidt (Update: 2018-06-22)