Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Processor N95

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Core i3-N305

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N305

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the N305, as of September 2023. Expect the chip to be 50% to 100% faster than the N95 (4 cores, 4 threads, up to 3.4 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solutuion of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 15 W and can be configured down to 9 W. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Processor N95

► remove from comparison Intel N95

The Intel Processor N95 (sometimes also called Celeron N95 or Pentium N95) is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. Compared to the similar Processor N100, the N95 offers a slightly higher TDP and therefore maybe a slightly improved sustained performance.

Performance

The average N95 in our database is in the same league as the Pentium 7505 and the Core i3-1115G4, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. That's not a great result, to put it mildly.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 1200 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N95 has a base power consumption of 12 W (compared to the 6 W of the N100) and is therefore well suited for thin and light systems. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Processor N200Intel Core i3-N305Intel Processor N95
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
CodenameAlder Lake-NAlder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 « 1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 « - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3700 MHz1800 - 3800 MHz <=3400 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP6 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) (1000 - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB
SocketBGA1264BGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
21.5 pt (30%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N305
28.8 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N95
26.1 pt (36%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
100%
N200 +
45 Points (31%)
65 Points (45%)
133%
N95 +
60 Points (42%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
100%
N200 +
91 Points (2%)
324 Points (6%)
200%
N95 +
min: 181     avg: 182.3     median: 182 (3%)     max: 184 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
min: 4832     avg: 5049     median: 5092 (5%)     max: 5181 Points
197%
N95 +
min: 2528     avg: 2711     median: 2769 (3%)     max: 2786 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
N200 +
690 Points (29%)
min: 939     avg: 983     median: 995 (42%)     max: 1001 Points
132%
N95 +
min: 618     avg: 820     median: 914 (39%)     max: 935 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N200 +
265 Points (29%)
min: 375     avg: 377     median: 376 (42%)     max: 380 Points
132%
N95 +
min: 229     avg: 306.8     median: 350 (39%)     max: 357 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N200 +
542 Points (1%)
min: 1855     avg: 1943     median: 1976 (5%)     max: 1998 Points
190%
N95 +
min: 976     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (3%)     max: 1067 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
219 Points (1%)
min: 828     avg: 845     median: 829 (5%)     max: 878 Points
203%
N95 +
min: 408     avg: 437     median: 445 (3%)     max: 452 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
113 Points (34%)
min: 163.6     avg: 165.1     median: 164.7 (50%)     max: 167 Points
134%
N95 +
min: 98     avg: 136.2     median: 151 (45%)     max: 155 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
min: 10.6     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (15%)     max: 12.05 Points
203%
N95 +
min: 5.18     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (7%)     max: 5.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
1.4 Points (34%)
min: 2.04     avg: 2     median: 2 (51%)     max: 2.05 Points
135%
N95 +
min: 1.3     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (46%)     max: 1.86 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
min: 5622     avg: 5651     median: 5651 (34%)     max: 5680 Points
121%
N95 +
min: 3562     avg: 4529     median: 4783 (29%)     max: 5141 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
min: 25813     avg: 26169     median: 26168.5 (19%)     max: 26524 Points
184%
N95 +
min: 12582     avg: 13741     median: 13854 (10%)     max: 14545 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
N200 +
11030 Points (8%)
min: 39133     avg: 39930     median: 39929.5 (28%)     max: 40726 Points
200%
N95 +
min: 20429     avg: 21521     median: 22075 (15%)     max: 22275 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
min: 8648     avg: 8708     median: 8708 (11%)     max: 8768 Points
127%
N95 +
min: 5904     avg: 7259     median: 7574 (9%)     max: 8177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N200 +
875 s (10%)
min: 246.308     avg: 1175     median: 1174.7 (14%)     max: 2103.1 s
104%
N95 +
min: 519.662     avg: 541     median: 537.3 (6%)     max: 568.939 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N200 +
26 s (5%)
min: 8.142     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 63.4 s
102%
N95 +
min: 16.449     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18.213 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
min: 3300     avg: 3377     median: 3377 (5%)     max: 3454 Points
110%
N95 +
min: 2181     avg: 2303     median: 2319.5 (4%)     max: 2391 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
min: 21080     avg: 21623     median: 21239 (12%)     max: 22551 MIPS
170%
N95 +
min: 11654     avg: 12003     median: 12177 (7%)     max: 12224 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N200 +
3230 MIPS (39%)
min: 3871     avg: 4033     median: 4105 (49%)     max: 4123 MIPS
118%
N95 +
min: 2972     avg: 3521     median: 3803 (45%)     max: 3866 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N200 +
16.3 fps (6%)
min: 55.6     avg: 55.9     median: 55.9 (20%)     max: 56.2 fps
199%
N95 +
min: 29.65     avg: 31.7     median: 32.4 (11%)     max: 32.45 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N200 +
80 fps (18%)
min: 201.6     avg: 202.6     median: 202.6 (47%)     max: 203.5 fps
203%
N95 +
min: 145.25     avg: 158.2     median: 162.2 (37%)     max: 163.3 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
min: 5.41     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (10%)     max: 5.62 fps
209%
N95 +
min: 3.03     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (6%)     max: 3.29 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.539 GB/s
84%
N95 +
min: 0.236     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.244 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (18%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
85%
N95 +
min: 0.492     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.501 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
min: 5.1     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
84%
N95 +
min: 2.4     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (7%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
min: 1152     avg: 1199     median: 1198.5 (15%)     max: 1245 Seconds
159%
N95 +
min: 2161     avg: 2202     median: 2186.5 (28%)     max: 2275 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
min: 583     avg: 598     median: 589 (4%)     max: 622 Seconds
109%
N95 +
min: 1103     avg: 1120     median: 1113 (8%)     max: 1152 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
min: 0.766     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.786 sec
109%
N95 +
min: 0.83     avg: 0.9     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 1.135 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
9081 Points (19%)
153%
N95 +
min: 5612     avg: 5863     median: 5952 (13%)     max: 6017 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
min: 17.549     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (4%)     max: 18 s
100%
N95 +
min: 7.058     avg: 18.8     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 24.428 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
36.5 s (2%)
100%
N95 +
min: 17.513     avg: 39.7     median: 40.5 (2%)     max: 50.772 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N200 +
1011 s (4%)
min: 744.681     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 772 s
101%
N95 +
min: 532.8     avg: 845     median: 824.7 (4%)     max: 1025.92 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
N200 +
9491 Points (8%)
min: 28884     avg: 28911     median: 28910.5 (25%)     max: 28937 Points
154%
N95 +
min: 13896     avg: 14556     median: 14595 (13%)     max: 14929 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
min: 8651     avg: 8896     median: 8926 (24%)     max: 9111 Points
205%
N95 +
min: 5084     avg: 5571     median: 5661 (15%)     max: 5806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
55544 Points (45%)
168%
N95 +
min: 36089     avg: 44673     median: 46477 (38%)     max: 47272 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
56367 Points (46%)
162%
N95 +
min: 36329     avg: 44756     median: 46489 (38%)     max: 47322 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
N200 +
34749 Points (29%)
61854 Points (52%)
141%
N95 +
min: 47145     avg: 48606     median: 49062 (41%)     max: 49955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
min: 8263     avg: 8470     median: 8567 (22%)     max: 8580 Points
148%
N95 +
min: 4105     avg: 4214     median: 4217 (11%)     max: 4345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
min: 11357     avg: 11598     median: 11625 (21%)     max: 11813 Points
144%
N95 +
min: 5701     avg: 5923     median: 5952 (11%)     max: 6062 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
min: 3455     avg: 3514     median: 3493 (15%)     max: 3593 Points
188%
N95 +
min: 2081     avg: 2301     median: 2346 (10%)     max: 2386 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
N200 +
956 Points (29%)
min: 1304     avg: 1316     median: 1318 (40%)     max: 1326 Points
128%
N95 +
min: 934     avg: 1132     median: 1227 (37%)     max: 1234 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1660 Points (7%)
min: 4632     avg: 4798     median: 4727 (19%)     max: 5034 Points
178%
N95 +
min: 2800     avg: 2958     median: 2961 (12%)     max: 3114 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
928 Points (39%)
min: 1050     avg: 1068     median: 1071 (45%)     max: 1083 Points
108%
N95 +
min: 761     avg: 917     median: 999 (42%)     max: 1013 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
min: 4492     avg: 4680     median: 4644 (8%)     max: 4905 Points
167%
N95 +
min: 2391     avg: 2577     median: 2566 (5%)     max: 2793 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
891 Points (4%)
min: 1006     avg: 1044     median: 1053 (5%)     max: 1072 Points
111%
N95 +
min: 749     avg: 910     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1005 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
min: 4218     avg: 4496     median: 4497 (14%)     max: 4774 Points
167%
N95 +
min: 2382     avg: 2537     median: 2531 (8%)     max: 2737 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
min: 4469     avg: 4633     median: 4632.5 (46%)     max: 4796 Points
98%
N95 +
min: 3411     avg: 4100     median: 4450 (44%)     max: 4553 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
9989 Points (11%)
min: 16566     avg: 17128     median: 17128 (19%)     max: 17690 Points
102%
N95 +
min: 9662     avg: 10169     median: 10228 (11%)     max: 10798 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
min: 981     avg: 986     median: 984 (1%)     max: 993 ms
100%
N95 +
min: 1026     avg: 1186     median: 1056 (1%)     max: 1577 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 140.3     avg: 158.2     median: 145.3 (42%)     max: 189 Points
87%
1 N95 +
min: 93.2     avg: 121.3     median: 126.8 (36%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N200 +
171.3 Points (36%)
min: 179.4     avg: 185.1     median: 185.4 (39%)     max: 190.4 Points
104%
N95 +
min: 121.3     avg: 163.5     median: 178.3 (37%)     max: 183.4 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
N200 +
614 Points (24%)
min: 881     avg: 907     median: 881 (34%)     max: 958 Points
124%
N95 +
min: 555     avg: 716     median: 764 (29%)     max: 820 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
min: 22.9     avg: 27.6     median: 25.5 (4%)     max: 34.5 Watt
98%
1 N95 +
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 31.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
36.9 Watt (7%)
99%
1 N95 +
min: 18.9     avg: 21.4     median: 20.8 (4%)     max: 25.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
102%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3.01     avg: 4.6     median: 3.5 (2%)     max: 7.2 Watt
99%
1 N95 +
min: 6.24     avg: 8.4     median: 7.3 (5%)     max: 12.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5.18     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 5.76 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)
139%
1 i3-N305 +
22.4 Points per Watt (17%)
131%
1 N95 +
21.1 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 100% n=51

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N305 → 211% n=51

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N95 → 143% n=51

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 22:39:07

#0 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14926 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14981 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.049s ... 0.05s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.022s ... 0.072s

#8 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.016s ... 0.087s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14926 +0.019s ... 0.107s

#10 got single benchmarks 14926 +0.022s ... 0.128s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14981 +0.02s ... 0.148s

#12 got single benchmarks 14981 +0.025s ... 0.173s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.173s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.634s ... 0.807s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.807s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)