Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T760 MP8 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

ARM Mali-T760 MP8

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T760 MP8

The ARM Mali-T760 MP8 is a fast mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa (Galaxy S6). The chip is available since Q1/2015 and is one of the fastest solutions of its class at the time of the introduction. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 - 16 cores/clusters.

The MP8 version offers 8 clusters clocked at up to 772 MHz (302 GFLOPS). In most benchmarks, the GPU is able to beat the competing Adreno 420 (Snapdragon 805) and PowerVR GX6450 (Apple A8). Only a few tablet chips like Tegra K1/X1 or the GXA6850 (Apple A8X) are still somewhat faster. Overall, the Mali-T760 MP8 is the fastest smartphone GPU in early 2015 and will handle even the most demanding Android games fluently in high resolutions.

Despite its impressive performance, the Mali-T760 MP8 / Exynos 7420 has a very modest power consumption thanks to an advanced 14 nm FinFET process (Samsung LPE). Therefore, it can be used even in smaller smartphones.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI is a high-end DirectX 11-compatible graphics solution for laptops, consisting of two GeForce GTX 965M. Each card has a 28 nm GM204 GPU based on the Maxwell architecture, which is the same chip as found on the GTX 980M, GTX 970M as well as several desktop cards. The clocks for the SLI-setup are usually identical to a single GTX 965M (924 MHz GPU, 1250 MHz memory).

With SLI, each card renders a single frame (AFR mode). Therefore, it may suffer from micro stuttering in low fps ranges of 30 fps. This happens because of different timespans between two frames (e.g., irregular delays between sequential frames).

Architecture

GM204 is based on Nvidia's Maxwell architecture, which replaces the previous Kepler generation. Among other changes, Nvidia have restructured the streaming multi processors (SMM) in order to increase workload and efficiency. Now each SMM contains only 128 shader units and 8 TMUs, which is noticeably less than an equivalent Kepler GPU. The GM204 features four GPCs, and each consists of four SMMs. But, in the GeForce GTX 965M, Nvidia have deactivated 8 of 16 SMMs. As a result, only 1024 shader ALUs and 64 TMUs are active. In addition, there are 32 ROPs in two clusters with 16 units each.

The memory interface has a bandwidth of 128-bits (2x 64 bit) for each of the two GPUs. Thanks to an improved compression algorithm, the connection to the GDDR5 memory should be significantly more efficient per MHz. Furthermore, the L1 (96 KB per SMM) and L2 caches (2 MB) have been significantly increased to lower the needed bandwidth. Compared to the mid-range GM107, the newer and larger GM204 has several additional features and changes. Aside from the improved polymorphic engine in the SSMs, it is also the first Nvidia chip to support DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1.

Performance

With good driver support, SLI almost doubles the performance of a single card. In this case, the GTX 965M SLI beats a single GeForce GTX 980M by about 10 percent. Therefore, the GTX 965M SLI is powerful enough to run even the most demanding games with highest details, AA/AF and/or resolutions exceeding FullHD.

Features

Most of the features are identical to the GeForce GTX 800M series. With the GTX 965M, there can be up to 4 active displays, but this will likely decrease due to Optimus. Displays can be connected with a maximum resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels via DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 2.0 (no HDCP @ 4K). HD audio formats like Dolby True HD and DTS HD can be sent to a compatible receiver as bitstream. As with previous models, 3D Vision is not supported with Optimus.

The video processor VP6 supports the usual formats like H.264 and can also decode and encode H.265 with a resolution of up to 4K via the NVENC API (hybrid H.265 decoder, not fully fixed function). Several parallel streams, such as picture-in-picture in a Blu-Ray movie, are also possible.

Further features of the GTX 900M series, which are also partly supported by older cards, include Battery Boost (longer battery life during gaming), Shadowplay (recording of gaming videos up to 4K60p and 130 Mbit/s) and Gamestream (game streaming on Shield console). More information on these features are available here.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of each GeForce GTX 965M including its MXM board and memory should be around 70 W, leading to a total TDP of about 140 W. Therefore, the SLI setup can only be used in very large and heavy gaming notebooks with powerful cooling systems. Under low load, dynamic clock rates help the GPUs to save energy.

ARM Mali-T760 MP8NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 900M Series
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 compare 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 compare 1 @ 0.6 GHz
GeForce GTX 980M SLI compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.13 GHz2x 256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 970M SLI compare 2560 @ 0.92 - 1.04 GHz2x 192 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 965M SLI 2048 @ 0.92 - 0.95 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 980M compare 1536 @ 1.04 - 1.13 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 970M compare 1280 @ 0.92 - 1.04 GHz192 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 965M compare 1024 @ 0.92 - 0.95 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 960M compare 640 @ 1.1 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 950M compare 640 @ 0.91 - 1.12 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 - 5000 MHz
CodenameMidgard (3rd Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (3rd-gen)Maxwell
Pipelines8 - unified2048 - unified
Core Speed700 - 772 (Boost) MHz924 - 950 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 11, OpenGL ES 3.1DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
technology14 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAABattery Boost, GameStream, ShadowPlay, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, PhysX, CUDA, SLI, GeForce Experience
Date of Announcement01.03.2015 05.01.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
Memory Speed5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2x 4096 MB
Transistors0 Billion
Notebook Sizelarge
CPU in Mali-T760 MP8GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa8 x 2100 MHz700 MHz772 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - GeForce GTX 965M SLI
4.7 pt (14%)
0.06787 -99%
0.1025 -98%
0.2337 -95%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
4.65
...
0.2337 -95%
max:
33.3 616%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 23193     avg: 25970     median: 26964 (3%)     max: 28192 Points
250259 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
73221 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
22188 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
51182 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
7815 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
10207 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
73450 Points (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
11638 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
14428 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6789 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
68.4 fps (24%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
116.3 fps (7%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
13 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 18     avg: 21.9     median: 22.5 (1%)     max: 25.5 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP8
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 46     avg: 52.3     median: 53.5 (0%)     max: 56.1 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 59.4     avg: 59.9     median: 59.8 (99%)     max: 60.4 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 9252     avg: 22140     median: 26124 (59%)     max: 27059 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 31743     avg: 35781     median: 36339.5 (81%)     max: 38701 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 59.7     avg: 60.1     median: 60.1 (89%)     max: 60.5 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1513 Samples/s (7%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
2699 Samples/s (5%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
3818 Points (4%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 4691     avg: 5019     median: 5054.5 (5%)     max: 5274 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 2227     avg: 2263     median: 2239.5 (4%)     max: 2345 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 4489     avg: 4519     median: 4510 (98%)     max: 4566 Points

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP8 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI → 928% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

med. 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
69  fps
high 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
40  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
27  fps
high 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
105.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
71.9  fps
high 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
72  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
49.8  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
high 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
115  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
90  fps
high 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
61.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
58.8  fps
high 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
89.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
69.2  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
84.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
60.1  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
85.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
56.9  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
165.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
93.1  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
145  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
76.2  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
244.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
117.6  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
64.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
57.3  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
159.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
62.8  fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLIlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Batman: Arkham Knight694027
Battlefield Hardline105.271.9
Dragon Age: Inquisition7249.8
F1 201411590
Ryse: Son of Rome61.258.8
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor89.569.2
Thief84.760.1
Metro: Last Light85.856.9
BioShock Infinite165.393.1
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm14576.2
Tomb Raider244.5117.6
Guild Wars 264.557.3
Sleeping Dogs159.962.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps





1

1
8
4
1
4
8






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 23. 22:15:39

#0 checking url part for id 6188 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6375 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:38:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.109s ... 0.11s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.111s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.111s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6188 +0.025s ... 0.136s

#8 got single benchmarks 6188 +0.012s ... 0.147s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6375 +0.02s ... 0.167s

#10 got single benchmarks 6375 +0.008s ... 0.175s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.175s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.079s ... 0.254s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.254s

#14 Got 27 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.262s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.262s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.011s ... 0.273s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.032s ... 0.305s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.305s

#19 return log +0.041s ... 0.346s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)