Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G78 MP20 vs ARM Mali-G710 MP10 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP5

ARM Mali-G78 MP20

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP20

The ARM Mali-G78MP20 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2021 in the Google Tensor SoC. It integrates 20 of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

ARM Mali-G710 MP10

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G710 MP10

The ARM Mali-G710 MP10 or MC10 is an integrated high-end graphics card for smartphones with 10 of the 16 possible cores. It is based on the third generation of the Valhall architecture by ARM which offers a 20% higher performance and energy efficiency than the previous generation. In the Dimensity 9000, the G710 is produced in the modern 4nm process. According to first benchmarks, the performance is similar to the Adreno 730 found in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and therefore one of the fastest GPUs for Android based smartphones.

ARM Mali-G57 MP5

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP5

The ARM Mali-G57 MP5 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 820 and uses 5 clusters (hence the MC5/MP5 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP5 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek Dimensity 820 / Remi 10x) is comparable to the Adreno 540 and also the ARM Mali-G57 MP6 (most likely due to higher clock rates).

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

show full text
ARM Mali-G78 MP20ARM Mali-G710 MP10ARM Mali-G57 MP5
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G710 MP10 10
Mali-G710 MP7 7
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhallValhallValhall
ArchitectureValhallValhallBifrost
Pipelines24 - unified10 - unified5 - unified
Shared Memorynoyesno
APIOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
technology5 nm4 nm7 nm
Date of Announcement26.05.2020 30.11.2021 03.07.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comdeveloper.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Mali-G78 MP20GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Google Tensor8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G710 MP10GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 9000+8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 90008 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G57 MP5GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
38974 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7344     avg: 8841     median: 9526 (41%)     max: 9654 Points
min: 11995     avg: 12623     median: 12622.5 (55%)     max: 13250 Points
5469 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11005     avg: 13516     median: 13988 (31%)     max: 15556 Points
18850 Points (41%)
5991 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6606     avg: 7184     median: 7205 (36%)     max: 7742 Points
min: 9689     avg: 10666     median: 10309 (51%)     max: 12000 Points
4497 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 8605     avg: 9432     median: 8957 (27%)     max: 10733 Points
min: 12658     avg: 13503     median: 13503 (40%)     max: 14348 Points
4798 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 7057     avg: 7127     median: 7064 (4%)     max: 7261 Points
min: 8497     avg: 8889     median: 8644 (4%)     max: 9770 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1626     avg: 1816     median: 1823 (2%)     max: 1998 Points
min: 2310     avg: 2427     median: 2373 (3%)     max: 2650 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
14 fps (6%)
min: 17     avg: 19     median: 19 (8%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 23     avg: 27     median: 28 (5%)     max: 30 fps
min: 37     avg: 42.2     median: 42.5 (8%)     max: 45 fps
12 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 49     avg: 58.7     median: 58 (4%)     max: 69 fps
min: 43     avg: 91     median: 100.5 (7%)     max: 106 fps
32 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 40     avg: 46.7     median: 48 (5%)     max: 52 fps
min: 73     avg: 80     median: 81 (9%)     max: 88 fps
29 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 75     median: 65 (1%)     max: 100 fps
min: 128     avg: 144.4     median: 149 (3%)     max: 161 fps
52 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 89     avg: 110     median: 90 (5%)     max: 151 fps
min: 177     avg: 208.7     median: 217.5 (13%)     max: 238 fps
71 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP20
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 125     avg: 173.7     median: 144 (1%)     max: 252 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G710 MP10
min: 246     avg: 286.8     median: 294 (2%)     max: 316 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP5
115 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 270503     avg: 282634     median: 282630 (35%)     max: 294770 Points
min: 352208     avg: 379075     median: 379365 (47%)     max: 411958 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
88.8 fps (1%)
min: 130.94     avg: 137.4     median: 137.4 (1%)     max: 143.86 fps
42 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 5330     avg: 5618     median: 5618 (2%)     max: 5906 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 4750     avg: 5306     median: 5306 (2%)     max: 5862 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 39834     avg: 45926     median: 45925.5 (46%)     max: 52017 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 32049     avg: 44588     median: 44588 (78%)     max: 57127 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.65     avg: 9.8     median: 10.3 (4%)     max: 10.4 Watt
min: 7.97     avg: 11.2     median: 10.4 (4%)     max: 16.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP20 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G710 MP10 → 171% n=11

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP5 → 60% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G710 MP10:
59  fps
ultra Ultra
Mali-G710 MP10:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
ultra
Mali-G710 MP10:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP20:
60  fps
133%
Mali-G710 MP10:
60 60 120 ~ 80 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-G710 MP10:
90  fps
Mali-G57 MP5:
60  fps
med.
Mali-G710 MP10:
60 89 ~ 75 fps
Mali-G57 MP5:
40  fps
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP20:
30 40 ~ 35 fps
171%
Mali-G710 MP10:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
114%
Mali-G57 MP5:
40  fps
ultra
Mali-G710 MP10:
39 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP20:
85  fps
71%
Mali-G57 MP5:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Mali-G57 MP5:
30  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP20:
90  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP20 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G710 MP10 → 152%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 171%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP5 → 92%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 92%

ARM Mali-G710 MP10lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal5960
Genshin Impact59
Armajet80
PUBG Mobile90756040
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1


1


2

2
1






ARM Mali-G78 MP20lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile35
Dead Trigger 285
Temple Run 290
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






1
3









ARM Mali-G57 MP5lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile604040
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends30
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1

1


2
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 04. 20:12:23

#0 checking url part for id 11098 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11114 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10480 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:42:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.131s ... 0.132s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.132s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.132s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11098 +0.036s ... 0.169s

#9 got single benchmarks 11098 +0.01s ... 0.178s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11114 +0.002s ... 0.18s

#11 got single benchmarks 11114 +0.019s ... 0.199s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10480 +0.002s ... 0.201s

#13 got single benchmarks 10480 +0.009s ... 0.21s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.21s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.12s ... 0.33s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.33s

#17 Got 29 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.339s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.339s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.341s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.017s ... 0.359s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.359s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.361s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)