Notebookcheck Logo

OnePlus Pad Review: A premium Android tablet experience that goes easy on the wallet

iPad 10 but with Android. OnePlus has finally ventured into Android tablets, a territory that is fast being ceded almost wholly to Apple and Samsung. Featuring a MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC and a fast, vivid 144 Hz 7:5 display, the OnePlus Pad aims to differentiate itself with a slew of accessories including the Magnetic Keyboard and OnePlus Stylo. We explore different aspects of the OnePlus Pad in this review and see if it can be a worthy portable companion. Review now complete.
OnePlus Pad

Update 5/17: Review now complete

Only a handful of OEMs continue to invest in developing new Android tablets each year with most manufacturers having ceded the territory to the Apple iPads. Therefore, OnePlus's unveiling of its first tablet, the OnePlus Pad, during the company's Cloud 11 event back in February came as a pleasant surprise to many. 

The OnePlus Pad is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC and features a 7:5 2000 x 2800 144 Hz display. The Pad comes in both 8 GB/128 GB and 12 GB/256 GB variants. There are several optional accessories on offer including a Magnetic Keyboard, OnePlus Stylo, and the OnePlus Folio case.

We have with us the OnePlus Pad with 12 GB LPDDR5 RAM and 256 GB UFS 3.1 storage. This variant retails for ₹39,999 (US$489) in India and comes with a one-year warranty.

OnePlus aims to deliver a premium tablet experience at a reasonable price. We evaluate if that's indeed the case in this review.

OnePlus Pad (Pad Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 8 x 1.8 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
11.61 inch 7:5, 2800 x 2000 pixel 296 PPI, Capacitive, native pen support, IPS, 10-bit, Dolby Vision, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1, 233.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass, Color spectrum, Hall Sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.5 x 258 x 189.4 ( = 0.26 x 10.16 x 7.46 in)
Battery
36.99 Wh, 9510 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 12.4 h
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix EIS, 4K 30 fps video, Camera2 API Support Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix EIS, 1080p 30 fps
Additional features
Speakers: Quad-speaker, Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: OnScreen, OnePlus Magnetic Keyboard, OnePlus Stylo, 67 W SuperVOOC Power Adapter, OxygenOS 13.1, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine CDM Security Level: L1, fanless
Weight
552 g ( = 19.47 oz / 1.22 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
443 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.3 %
04/2023
OnePlus Pad
Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10
552 g6.5 mm11.61"2800x2000
82.4 %
04/2023
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
520 g7.4 mm11.50"2000x1200
88.3 %
04/2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
572 g5.7 mm12.40"2800x1752
88.8 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
726 g5.5 mm14.60"2960x1848
91.8 %
11/2022
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2, M2 10-Core GPU
682 g6.4 mm12.90"2732x2048
88.6 %
11/2022
Apple iPad 10
A14, A14 Bionic GPU
477 g7 mm10.90"2360x1640
91.7 %
03/2022
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1, M1 8-Core GPU
461 g6.1 mm10.90"2360x1640

Case: Premium sleek unibody construction

The OnePlus Pad sports an all-glass front that is ensconced in an aluminum unibody construction. The Pad is available only in the Halo Green color option, which signifies vitality and life according to the company.

At 6.5 mm, the Pad feels quite sleek, but the Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra takes the prize for being the slimmest of the bunch.

The OnePlus Pad is a lot lighter than Samsung's flagship tablet, however, tipping the scales at just above half a kilogram. Despite the reduced overall weight, the Pad feels secure and sturdy in the hands.

The display glass sits flush with the cambered frame, and the 2.5D curved round edges give the whole thing an elegant look.

OnePlus has managed kept the bezel thickness low at 6.7 mm for the sake of ergonomics while still offering an impressive 88.14% screen-to-body ratio. The company does not advertise any form of Gorilla Glass protection for the screen.

Overall, the OnePlus Pad's construction is quite sturdy, and we found no noticeable flexing issues with the chassis.

Size comparison

326.4 mm / 12.9 inch 208.6 mm / 8.21 inch 5.5 mm / 0.2165 inch 726 g1.601 lbs285 mm / 11.2 inch 185 mm / 7.28 inch 5.7 mm / 0.2244 inch 572 g1.261 lbs280.6 mm / 11 inch 214.9 mm / 8.46 inch 6.4 mm / 0.252 inch 682 g1.504 lbs269 mm / 10.6 inch 169 mm / 6.65 inch 7.4 mm / 0.2913 inch 520 g1.146 lbs258 mm / 10.2 inch 189.4 mm / 7.46 inch 6.5 mm / 0.2559 inch 552 g1.217 lbs248.6 mm / 9.79 inch 179.5 mm / 7.07 inch 7 mm / 0.2756 inch 477 g1.052 lbs247.6 mm / 9.75 inch 178.5 mm / 7.03 inch 6.1 mm / 0.2402 inch 461 g1.016 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Hardware: Quad-speakers with Dolby Atmos

The Pad's minimalism continues into the port selection as well. Basically, you get just a single USB Type-C port at the bottom for all connectivity needs.

OTG support is available, but OnePlus hasn't exactly specified the USB standard used here. But if the OnePlus 11 is anything to go by, the Pad is also likely to make do with just USB 2.0 speeds.

The left side of the tablet is largely clean, save for the triple pins that attach to accessories such as the Magnetic Keyboard. Towards the right, we get a magnetic area for latching the OnePlus Stylo and the volume rockers.

The top and bottom of the tablet have a pair of speakers each. This quad-speaker setup is certified for Dolby Atmos. There are two mics on the frame — one beside the Type-C port and another near the volume rockers.

The rear houses a 13 MP camera that is centered for symmetry. The positioning primarily helps with landscape shots. An 8 MP selfie camera is situated inconspicuously in the display.

Top: Volume rocker
Top: Volume rocker
Bottom: Magnetic pins
Bottom: Magnetic pins
Left: Power button
Left: Power button
Right: USB Type-C port
Right: USB Type-C port

Software: OxygenOS 13.1 with three years of feature updates

The OnePlus Pad comes preinstalled with OxygenOS 13.1 based on Android 13 with the latest security patches dated 5 March 2023.

OnePlus has received flak for shifting its codebase from the original OxygenOS to the one based on Oppo's ColorOS, but the Pad comes with no bloatware. The only preinstalled third-party apps are Netflix and WPS Office. Widevine L1 level certification is available for high resolution DRM-protected streaming.

OxygenOS 13.1 on the OnePlus Pad comes with several gestures that enable effective multitasking. The Pad is designed to fit into the larger OnePlus ecosystem, which enables several quality-of-life features include 5G cellular data sharing with nearby OnePlus phones, OTP on the go, auto-connect and cross-screen sharing between the Pad and OnePlus phone, and remote control for OnePlus TVs via the OnePlus Connect app.

According to OnePlus, these ecosystem features will roll out via OTA updates in the coming months. The auto-connect feature with the OnePlus phone will not be coming to Europe, so those users will have to connect manually each time.

OnePlus promises three years of feature updates and four years of security patches for the Pad. This is similar to the OnePlus 11R and unlike the OnePlus 11 that offers an extra year of software support.

Communication: Fast, stable Wi-Fi throughput

The OnePlus Pad does not support cellular connectivity or the latest Wi-Fi 6E standard. However, the Pad manages to top the charts in Wi-Fi 6 throughput when tested with our reference Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 router.

Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000
OnePlus Pad
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1710 (1696min - 1724max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
959 (486min - 977max) MBit/s -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Wi-Fi 6E
909 (871min - 942max) MBit/s -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
896 (774min - 935max) MBit/s -48%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=97)
879 MBit/s -49%
Apple iPad 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
816 (764min - 851max) MBit/s -52%
Average of class Tablet
  (36.6 - 1710, n=77, last 2 years)
514 MBit/s -70%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
493 (433min - 516max) MBit/s -71%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Wi-Fi 6E
486 (175min - 591max) MBit/s -72%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (179min - 379max) MBit/s -78%
Oppo Pad Air
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
357 (257min - 376max) MBit/s -79%
Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus Pad
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1696 (1635min - 1722max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Wi-Fi 6E
832 (779min - 876max) MBit/s -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
831 (779min - 861max) MBit/s -51%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=97)
820 MBit/s -52%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
769 (744min - 780max) MBit/s -55%
Apple iPad 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
741 (621min - 759max) MBit/s -56%
Average of class Tablet
  (44.1 - 1696, n=77, last 2 years)
481 MBit/s -72%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Wi-Fi 6E
442 (222min - 528max) MBit/s -74%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
409 (366min - 434max) MBit/s -76%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
367 (358min - 370max) MBit/s -78%
Oppo Pad Air
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
306 (289min - 326max) MBit/s -82%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
OnePlus Pad 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1708 (1696-1724)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (871-942)
OnePlus Pad 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1696 (1635-1722)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø832 (779-876)

The OnePlus Pad supports GPS, GLONASS, GALiLEO, SBAS, and BDS (B1 and B1C bands). There is no NavIC support. 

Outdoor GNSS is accurate to 1 m, but the OnePlus Pad does take some time in latching onto satellite signals indoors.

GNSS accuracy indoors
GNSS accuracy indoors
GNSS accuracy outdoors
GNSS accuracy outdoors
GPS satellite support
GPS satellite support

In a test drive together with the Apple iPhone 14 Pro as a reference GPS device the OnePlus Pad differs by just 70 m, which is a fairly accurate location tracking.

GPS test drive
GPS test drive
GPS comparison: Apple iPhone 14 Pro vs. OnePlus Pad
GPS comparison: Apple iPhone 14 Pro vs. OnePlus Pad

Cameras: Decent images from the 13 MP sensor in good lighting

The OnePlus Pad features a single 13 MP rear camera and an LED flash. The camera supports EIS and enables video recording up to 4K 30 fps.

The 8 MP front-facing wide-angle camera supports EIS and video recording up to 1080p 30 fps. Selfies come out well in good lighting conditions, though highlights seem a bit overdone. The bokeh effect in Selfie mode is serviceable for the most part, but it is not very strong.

The front camera also supports a Limelight mode, which comes in handy for centering faces during video calls.

OnePlus Pad 8 MP selfie camera in Photo mode
OnePlus Pad 8 MP selfie camera in Photo mode
OnePlus Pad 8 MP selfie camera in Selfie mode
OnePlus Pad 8 MP selfie camera in Selfie mode

The camera app is pretty basic but is adequate for tablet use. There's no Pro mode, but you get Pano, Slow-Mo, and Time Lapse options.

OnePlus Pad camera app
OnePlus Pad camera app

The 13 MP main camera outputs decent images in good lighting conditions, which are more than adequate for casual use. The image has good detailing with decent color reproduction, but the saturation is a bit on the lower side. The camera struggles to properly resolve some of the finer details in a crowded scene, such as the flowers in the garden shot below.

Photos taken in low light have considerable noise and a significant loss of detail with off-tangent colors. Once again, finer aspects of the image, such the fur in the teddy bear, are not well resolved.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main CameraMain CameraLow Light

In our ColorChecker Passport test in perfect lighting conditions, we see that the camera is able to reproduce all colors fairly accurately with an average delta E of about 6.47. The largest deviations are seen in foliage green, blue sky, and dark skin color tones.

The test chart in perfect light shows a well-resolved image with good sharpness and clarity.

However, the camera barely sees the subject in 1 lux ambient light. The OnePlus Pad does not attempt to adjust exposure or shutter speed in the default Auto mode resulting in virtually dark images.

ColorChecker
9.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Pad: 6.47 ∆E min: 1.46 - max: 10.96 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
50.7 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
29 ∆E
62.9 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
71.3 ∆E
41.7 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
73.4 ∆E
68.3 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Pad: 44.79 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 73.42 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty: Magnetic Keyboard and OnePlus Stylo offered optionally

OnePlus Pad: Accessories
OnePlus Pad: Accessories

In the box, we get a 100 W SuperVOOC charger that actually charges the tablet at 67 W, a USB Type-A to Type-C cable, and the usual paperwork.

OnePlus offers a slew of accessories with the Pad. Our review unit came bundled with a Magnetic Keyboard and the OnePlus Stylo pen, which are otherwise separate purchases.

According to OnePlus, the Magnetic Keyboard will set you back by ₹7,999 (US$98) while the Stylo pen will cost another ₹4,999 (US$61). A folio case without the keyboard costs ₹1,499 (US$18).

The OnePlus Pad and the accessories come with a one-year limited warranty in India.

Input Devices and Operation: Refresh rate limitations can increase stylus latency

The Magnetic Keyboard is a useful accessory for productivity that offers a decent typing experience with good key travel and tactility. The keyboard is not backlit, and those used to a typical PC keyboard will require some time to get used to the layout, particularly with the Function keys.

The integrated touchpad offers a smooth, gliding movement but feels cramped as there's only limited space to move the pointer without lifting your finger.

While the keyboard also doubles-up as a folio case, folding it is not a seamless experience as the tablet dislodges itself when folded due to the location of the pogo pins.

The OnePlus Stylo, on the other hand, can connect to the magnetic area on the top surface of the tablet. The stylus offers 4096 levels of pressure, up to 60° tilt, supports replaceable tips, and is extremely smooth to use for drawing and writing — so smooth that you might have to train your reflexes at times for precise strokes.

It is possible to configure a double-tap gesture on the Stylo — double tap once to select a pen and double tap again to toggle the eraser. Palm rejection is supported.

Since OxygenOS does not allow unlocking the 144 Hz refresh rate for all apps, the overall experience with the Stylo can be inconsistent depending on the maximum refresh rate utilized by your drawing or note-taking app of choice.

Default Gboard keyboard in landscape orientation
Default Gboard keyboard in landscape orientation
Default Gboard keyboard in portrait orientation
Default Gboard keyboard in portrait orientation

Display: 7:5 144 Hz IPS display with Dolby Vision and no PWM

OnePlus has endowed the Pad with a 11.61-inch 7:5 aspect 2800 x 2000 display with a 144 Hz refresh rate and support for Dolby Vision HDR. This is no AMOLED, but we measured a high 1,481:1 contrast ratio.

The colors seem saturated and punchy in the Vivid color profile and the overall subjective viewing experience is very good. The 7:5 aspect ratio makes the OnePlus Pad a convenient reading tool, but you will have to put up with black bars at the top and bottom while watching videos.

The panel is specified to offer 500 nits of typical luminance, but we measured a peak value of about 447 nits with a good 89% distribution. The brightness is technically insufficient for HDR and neither does the Pad boost its brightness when viewing HDR content. Currently, only YouTube HDR is supported.

Backlight bleeding is prominent at the corners when observed in the dark under long exposure, but this is unlikely to affect normal viewing.

Subpixel matrix
Subpixel matrix
Backlight bleeding at the corners under long exposure
Backlight bleeding at the corners under long exposure
440
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3
Maximum: 474 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 447.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.94 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 474 cd/m²
Contrast: 1481:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
OnePlus Pad
IPS, 2800x2000, 11.61
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
IPS, 2000x1200, 11.50
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.40
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Super AMOLED, 2960x1848, 14.60
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Liquid Retina XDR Display, Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.90
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.61
Apple iPad 10
Liquid Retina, IPS, 2360x1640, 10.90
Oppo Pad Air
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.36
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.90
Response Times
-65%
165%
168%
3462%
-52%
-60%
-71%
-46%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
23.46 ?(10.9, 12.56)
39.8 ?(19.1, 20.7)
-70%
1.383 ?(0.7095, 0.6735)
94%
1.495 ?(0.7725, 0.772)
94%
35.3 ?(14.8, 19.5)
-50%
38.13 ?(17.15, 20.98)
-63%
42.68 ?(21.08, 21.6)
-82%
42.7 ?(23.7, 19)
-82%
24.9 ?(11.6, 13.3)
-6%
Response Time Black / White *
16.18 ?(8.38, 7.8)
25.7 ?(14.4, 11.3)
-59%
1.318 ?(0.6225, 0.6955)
92%
1.38 ?(0.6875, 0.6925)
91%
37.53 ?(16, 21.53)
-132%
22.89 ?(10.42, 12.47)
-41%
22.31 ?(10.08, 12.23)
-38%
25.7 ?(14.4, 11.3)
-59%
30.1 ?(15.9, 14.2)
-86%
PWM Frequency
60.01 ?(100)
245.4
309%
250.8
318%
6401 ?(100)
10567%
Screen
-41%
1%
19%
28%
-4%
3%
-47%
16%
Brightness middle
474
423
-11%
459
-3%
600
27%
611
29%
418
-12%
467
-1%
352
-26%
529
12%
Brightness
447
396
-11%
462
3%
604
35%
605
35%
402
-10%
468
5%
339
-24%
490
10%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
97
9%
96
8%
92
3%
90
1%
92
3%
85
-4%
86
-3%
Black Level *
0.32
0.29
9%
0.28
12%
0.49
-53%
0.45
-41%
0.37
-16%
Contrast
1481
1459
-1%
1493
1%
953
-36%
782
-47%
1430
-3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.16
5.32
-68%
2.2
30%
2.7
15%
1.4
56%
2.3
27%
1.4
56%
4.79
-52%
1.35
57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.37
9.87
-84%
4.9
9%
5.3
1%
3.3
39%
5.4
-1%
3.3
39%
8.65
-61%
2.45
54%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
6.6
-164%
3.6
-44%
1.8
28%
2.3
8%
3.7
-48%
2.3
8%
5.5
-120%
2.1
16%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.159 102%
2.09 105%
2.09 105%
2.22 99%
2.21 100%
2.21 100%
2.118 104%
2.183 101%
CCT
7112 91%
7979 81%
6558 99%
6461 101%
6930 94%
6595 99%
6852 95%
7889 82%
6939 94%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-53% / -46%
83% / 55%
94% / 69%
1745% / 1173%
-28% / -13%
-29% / -10%
-59% / -52%
-15% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Real mode with default color temperature (Color space target: sRGB)

The OnePlus Pad offers three color modes for the Pad viz. Vivd, Natural, and Real.

In our testing with the X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 spectrophotometer and Calman Ultimate color calibration software from Portrait Displays, we found the Real color profile to offer the best color accuracy and highest sRGB 2D color gamut coverage.

Grayscale Avg dE2000: 2.5
Grayscale Avg dE2000: 2.5
sRGB Color Gamut: 99.8% coverage
sRGB Color Gamut: 99.8% coverage
ColorChecker Avg dE2000: 3.16. Max dE2000: 5.37
ColorChecker Avg dE2000: 3.16. Max dE2000: 5.37
Saturation Sweeps Avg dE2000: 3.02. Max dE2000: 5
Saturation Sweeps Avg dE2000: 3.02. Max dE2000: 5

Natural mode with default color temperature (Color space target: sRGB)

Natural mode is very much similar to Real, but here we see an increase in Grayscale dE2000. However, the colors show much lesser deviation.

Grayscale Avg dE2000: 3.4
Grayscale Avg dE2000: 3.4
sRGB Color Gamut: 98% coverage
sRGB Color Gamut: 98% coverage
ColorChecker Avg dE2000: 2.57. Max dE2000: 5.91
ColorChecker Avg dE2000: 2.57. Max dE2000: 5.91
Saturation Sweeps Avg dE2000: 1.67. Max dE2000: 5.14
Saturation Sweeps Avg dE2000: 1.67. Max dE2000: 5.14

Vivid mode with default color temperature (Color space target: DCI-P3)

Vivid covers 96.3% of the 2D DCI-P3 color space, but we see high Grayscale and ColorChecker deviations. Subjectively, however, users are likely to prefer this setting as the colors seem a lot punchier.

Grayscale Avg dE2000: 6.8
Grayscale Avg dE2000: 6.8
DCI-P3 Color Gamut: 96.3% coverage
DCI-P3 Color Gamut: 96.3% coverage
ColorChecker Avg dE2000: 4.55. Max dE2000: 9.86
ColorChecker Avg dE2000: 4.55. Max dE2000: 9.86
Saturation Sweeps Avg dE2000: 4.89. Max dE2000: 10.46
Saturation Sweeps Avg dE2000: 4.89. Max dE2000: 10.46

Vivid mode with warm color temperature (Color space target: DCI-P3)

Color accuracy in Vivid can be improved by increasing the color temperature. This results in perceivable improvements to Grayscale and ColorChecker dE2000 values.

Grayscale Avg dE2000: 3.7
Grayscale Avg dE2000: 3.7
DCI-P3 Color Gamut: 96.3% coverage
DCI-P3 Color Gamut: 96.3% coverage
ColorChecker Avg dE2000: 2.92. Max dE2000: 6.09
ColorChecker Avg dE2000: 2.92. Max dE2000: 6.09
Saturation Sweeps Avg dE2000: 3.29. Max dE2000: 6.7
Saturation Sweeps Avg dE2000: 3.29. Max dE2000: 6.7

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.38 ms rise
↘ 7.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
23.46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.9 ms rise
↘ 12.56 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60.01 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60.01 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60.01 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17803 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The OnePlus Pad's response times are decent considering this is an IPS display not aimed at gamers.

We observe display flickering at all tested brightness levels. However, the panel is actually not using PWM as the signal itself does not change with change in brightness as seen below.

0% brightness: 180.9 kHz
0% brightness: 180.9 kHz
25% brightness: 101.82 kHz
25% brightness: 101.82 kHz
50% brightness: 30.29 kHz
50% brightness: 30.29 kHz
75% brightness: 491.76 Hz
75% brightness: 491.76 Hz
100% brightness: 60 Hz
100% brightness: 60 Hz

Screen legibility outdoors is serviceable, but a higher peak brightness would have definitely helped. Viewing angles are relatively stable for the most part with only a slight loss of brightness and color information at the extremes.

Outdoor viewing under sunlight
Outdoor viewing under sunlight
Outdoor viewing under shade
Outdoor viewing under shade
Slight loss of brightness and color at extreme viewing angles
Slight loss of brightness and color at extreme viewing angles

Performance: Dimensity 9000 offers perceivable leads over Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

Given our past experiences with OnePlus phones, we ensured that the High Performance mode was enabled for all benchmarks except for battery life measurements.

The OnePlus Pad's MediaTek Dimensity 9000 leads the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra by a small margin in Geekbench 5.4 single-core and AnTuTu.

Multi-core performance in this benchmark shows gains of 18% over the 8 Gen 1 and is on par with the A14 Bionic in the Apple iPad 10, though the latter shows good leads in single-core.

Qualcomm's last gen flagship SoC, however, has a whopping 145% lead over the Dimensity 9000 in Procyon AI inference tests.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
1890 Points +48%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
Apple M1, M1 8-Core GPU, 8192
1719 Points +34%
Apple iPad 10
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
1580 Points +24%
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
1279 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (1211 - 1279, n=5)
1246 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1242 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1182 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1892, n=71, last 2 years)
657 Points -49%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
490 Points -62%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
8524 Points +113%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
Apple M1, M1 8-Core GPU, 8192
7034 Points +76%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (3736 - 4324, n=5)
4056 Points +1%
Apple iPad 10
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
4027 Points +1%
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
3998 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3393 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3293 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8524, n=71, last 2 years)
2329 Points -42%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1797 Points -55%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
1663 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (1599 - 1663, n=2)
1631 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet
  (408 - 1663, n=5, last 2 years)
728 Points -56%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
720 Points -57%
Multi-Core
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (4130 - 4445, n=2)
4288 Points +4%
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
4130 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (1361 - 4130, n=5, last 2 years)
2076 Points -50%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1965 Points -52%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
1416727 Points +51%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
Apple M1, M1 8-Core GPU, 8192
1040908 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (935522 - 1017490, n=5)
987309 Points +6%
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
935522 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
889268 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
821646 Points -12%
Apple iPad 10
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
691084 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet
  (92766 - 1416727, n=53, last 2 years)
449757 Points -52%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
312314 Points -67%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
15951 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (13407 - 17573, n=4)
15462 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13996 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
13711 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9578 Points -40%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 17267, n=68, last 2 years)
8789 Points -45%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
1584 Points +42%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
Apple M1, M1 8-Core GPU, 8192
1266 Points +14%
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
1114 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1090 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (948 - 1114, n=3)
1038 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
999 Points -10%
Apple iPad 10
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
987 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1880, n=54, last 2 years)
688 Points -38%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
568 Points -49%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (7255 - 7714, n=3)
7474 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
7453 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6816 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6283 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet
  (444 - 8886, n=54, last 2 years)
3605 Points -52%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2855 Points -62%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
Points -100%
Apple iPad 10
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
System
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
10635 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (9398 - 11650, n=3)
10561 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10112 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
9273 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet
  (1103 - 14097, n=54, last 2 years)
6530 Points -39%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5261 Points -51%
Memory
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (6873 - 7900, n=3)
7458 Points +9%
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
6873 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6763 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
5739 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet
  (916 - 8890, n=54, last 2 years)
4248 Points -38%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3454 Points -50%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
22308 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
22283 Points +1%
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
22155 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (19574 - 22155, n=3)
20741 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (580 - 31738, n=54, last 2 years)
6508 Points -71%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2762 Points -88%
Web
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (1906 - 1951, n=3)
1921 Points +1%
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
1906 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1415 Points -26%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1325 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1291 Points -32%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 1907, n=54, last 2 years)
1208 Points -37%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
73266 Points +145%
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
29879 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (29236 - 30392, n=3)
29836 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9218 Points -69%
Average of class Tablet
  (1662 - 44323, n=51, last 2 years)
8717 Points -71%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  (27367 - 28688, n=2)
28028 Points +2%
OnePlus Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288
27367 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 156427, n=40, last 2 years)
5199 Points -81%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
877 Points -97%

The Dimensity 9000 comes with an integrated Mali-G710 MP10 GPU. The Mali-G710's performance in 3DMark tests is higher than the A14 Bionic's GPU.

The 8 Gen 1's Adreno 730 does have an overall advantage over the Mali-G710, but the latter manages to narrow this gap in select tests.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6909 Points +199%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
4144 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2493 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2325 Points +1%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
2310 Points
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
2124 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
330 Points -86%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6919 Points +191%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
4913 Points +107%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2473 Points +4%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
2377 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2337 Points -2%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
2250 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
342 Points -86%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
25317 Points +198%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
18309 Points +115%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9519 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8798 Points +4%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
8539 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
8497 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1109 Points -87%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
5321 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3728 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3651 Points -31%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14734 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13039 Points +3%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
12658 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
9689 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8799 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8374 Points -14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps 0%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
60 fps 0%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
60 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
873 fps +255%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
557 fps +126%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
334 fps +36%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
317 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
288 fps +17%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
246 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps -74%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps +32%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps 0%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
60 fps 0%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
60 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
494 fps +179%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
317 fps +79%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
177 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
171 fps -3%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
171 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
163 fps -8%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -77%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
115 fps +125%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +16%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
58 fps +14%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
51 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -55%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
340 fps +166%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
229 fps +79%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
128 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps -5%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
120 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -10%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -80%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
89 fps +178%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +88%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
45 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +34%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
32 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -12%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -59%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
214 fps +193%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
153.5 fps +110%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
75 fps +3%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
73 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -7%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -79%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
70 fps +169%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +131%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
34 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps +4%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
26 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.5 fps -63%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
90 fps +143%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60.9 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps 0%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
37 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -5%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
32 fps -14%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -84%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
89 fps +147%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +67%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
47 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +8%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
36 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
241 fps +159%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
149 fps +60%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
94 fps +1%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
93 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -4%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -83%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
48 fps +182%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
17 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
16 fps -6%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps -85%

Basemark GPUScore