Notebookcheck

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G Smartphone Review - Faster than a Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?

Dual 5G support for 200 Euros (~$233). The Redmi 10X is an affordable mid-range smartphone that scores with a beautiful AMOLED panel and the fast MediaTek Dimensity 820 processor. We were positively surprised by the reliable speed of the optical in-display fingerprint sensor, which is excellent for this price range and whose response isn't really any slower than the ultra-sound solution in the Samsung Galaxy S20 smartphones.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (translated by Mark Riege),
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone

With the 10X series, Xiaomi has introduced additional models of its Redmi budget brand for the Chinese market. Versions of the Redmi 10X include 4G, 5G, and also Pro models. The 4G model has an identical build to the Redmi Note 9, which we already ran through our tests. The most affordable version of the Redmi 10X 5G is available from some importers starting from 200 Euros (~$233), which is relatively affordable for a smartphone that supports the new 5G mobile communication standard. 

The Redmi 10X 5G also offers a 6.57-inch AMOLED display in the waterdrop notch design. The display notch holds a 16-MP selfie camera, and a triple camera system with a 48-MP lens is built into the back. The Chinese manufacturer uses the MediaTek Dimensity 820 processor inside, and it is optionally accompanied by 6 or 8 GB of RAM as well as up to 256 GB of internal UFS storage. 

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Redmi 10 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 820 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP5
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.57 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, acceleration sensor, gyroscope, electronic compass, OTG, Miracast, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G: n1 / n3 / n41 / n78 / n79; 4G: FDD-LTE: B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 TDD-LTE: B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41; 3G: B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8 CDMA EVDO: BC0; 2G: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8 CDMA 1X: BC0, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.99 x 164.2 x 75.8 ( = 0.35 x 6.46 x 2.98 in)
Battery
4520 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1.6 um (4 in 1), FOV 79 °) + 8 MP (telephoto, OIS) + 8 MP (wide-angle, FOV 119 °) + 5 MP (macro)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (FOV 78.5 °)
Additional features
Speakers: mono, Keyboard: onscreen, 22.5 W charger, USB cable, protective case, MiUI 12, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L3, fanless
Weight
208 g ( = 7.34 oz / 0.46 pounds), Power Supply: 89 g ( = 3.14 oz / 0.2 pounds)
Price
220 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84 %
10/2020
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5
208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2400x1080
83 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79 %
06/2020
Samsung Galaxy A41
Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2
152 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.1"2400x1080
80 %
06/2020
realme 6 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.6"2400x1080
79 %
05/2020
Oppo A91
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.4"2400x1080
76 %
05/2020
Nokia 5.3
SD 665, Adreno 610
185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.55"1600x720

Case - Redmi 10X 5G with a lot of glass

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone

The case of the Redmi 10X 5G convinces with a very good quality of the workmanship. The keys sit tightly in the frame and their pressure points are just right. While there is no specific protection from water entry, Xiaomi uses a nano coating from P2i as in its other Redmi models, so that the Redmi 10X should be protected during the rain or against dust.   

The front and back consist of scratch proof glass that comes from Corning (Gorilla Glass 5) according to some reports. However, Xiaomi does not specify this itself. The bezels around the 6.57-inch OLED panel turned out small for this price range, which results in a good 84% display-to-surface ratio.

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone

Size Comparison

165.75 mm / 6.53 inch 76.68 mm / 3.02 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 209 g0.4608 lbs164.2 mm / 6.46 inch 75.8 mm / 2.98 inch 8.99 mm / 0.3539 inch 208 g0.4586 lbs164.3 mm / 6.47 inch 76.6 mm / 3.02 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 185 g0.4079 lbs163.8 mm / 6.45 inch 75.8 mm / 2.98 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 195 g0.4299 lbs160.2 mm / 6.31 inch 73.3 mm / 2.89 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 172 g0.3792 lbs149.9 mm / 5.9 inch 69.8 mm / 2.75 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 152 g0.3351 lbs

Equipment - Xiaomi smartphone with a 3.5-mm audio port

The Xiaomi smartphone is charged via the USB Type-C port at the bottom of the case, which supports the USB 2.0 standard and recognizes peripheral devices such as USB sticks via OTG adapter.  

Our Redmi 10X does not allow viewing video content on Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and other video streaming services in HD quality, since the Widevine DRM level is only specified as L3 in the Chinese versions of Xiaomi smartphones. 

The Redmi 10X does not forego a status LED, and as typical for OLED screens, there is also an always-on function (ambient display) for notifications. The internal UFS-2.1 storage has a capacity of 128 GB in our test unit, which is reduced to 106 GB of available storage with the rest being used for the operating system and preinstalled apps. Those who need more capacity can select the 256-GB version or expand the storage via microSD cards. 

Software - Xiaomi smartphone with MiUI 12

The operating system of the Redmi 10X is based on Android 10 with a security patch level of July 2020. On top of this, the manufacturer has installed the in-house MiUI version 12. Besides some visual adjustments, MiUI 12 offers numerous adjustment options and the user interface is very well optimized. Friends of the iOS design will now find an optional news center and an iOS-like app switcher under MiUI 12, and in addition there are also numerous themes.

In the state of delivery, the Redmi 10X does not support Google services such as the Play Store, and instead Chinese services and Xiaomi's own services are used. However, in contrast to Huawei smartphones, you don't have to make do without the Google services but can just install them later. 

Note: When installing the Play Store later, there are possibly some applications that cannot be installed, since the Play Store has not been officially certified. 

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone

Communication and GPS - Redmi 10X 5G with fast WLAN

While the 10X supports access to a total of 12 LTE bands, the LTE frequencies relevant for Germany such as band 20 and 28 are missing. Thanks to its 5G modem, the Redmi smartphone can also access the mobile Internet using the most current mobile communication standard, enabling very high data rates. The dual-SIM smartphone offers space for two Nano-SIM cards, with neither of the two card slots being limited in terms of the frequencies. 

Using your WiFi network at home, constant transfer rates that are high for this price class are also possible. The integrated WLAN module, which supports the IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac standards as well as MIMO technology, reaches transfer speeds of more than 600 Mbps in conjunction with our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router.

In terms of the communication modules, Xiaomi uses Bluetooth version 5.1, and the Redmi 10X also contains an NFC chip for Near Field Communication.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Mali-G57 MP5, Dimensity 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
634 (495min - 650max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
365 (349min - 370max) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
294 (80min - 338max) MBit/s ∼46% -54%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 (145min - 352max) MBit/s ∼46% -54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=600)
282 MBit/s ∼44% -56%
Nokia 5.3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
145 (20min - 215max) MBit/s ∼23% -77%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Mali-G57 MP5, Dimensity 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (642min - 704max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
349 (339min - 355max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
332 (312min - 337max) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (137min - 336max) MBit/s ∼42% -58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=600)
268 MBit/s ∼39% -61%
Nokia 5.3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
163 (25min - 258max) MBit/s ∼24% -76%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø633 (495-650)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø687 (642-704)
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test outdoors
GPS Test outdoors

The position is determined via the GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, and Beidou main satellite systems, as well as the satellite-based SBAS augmentation system. Outdoors, the satellite-based location determination occurs with an accuracy of about 1 meter (~3 ft), and the Redmi 10X even succeeds fairly quickly in finding its position indoors.

In order to evaluate the location accuracy of our test unit in practice, we usually record a route for comparison with the Garmin Edge 520 GPS bike computer in parallel. However, in our measurements with the Redmi 10X 5G, we encountered some problems with the app recording. In two attempts, the smartphone failed to record a route, so that we cannot provide any route details. 

So unfortunately, the smartphone isn't really reliable to use for everyday navigation tasks.

Telephone Functions and Voice Quality - Redmi 10X 5G with dual 5G

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone

The voice quality in the Redmi 10X 5G is without fault. Video calls via Skype using the built-in front camera also work without any trouble in the test. The voice quality using the built-in speaker is good and the built-in microphone transfers voices loud and clear. 

Although the Redmi 10X is an affordable mid-range smartphone, it supports dual-VoLTE as well as dual-5G, and calls using the WLAN network at home are also allowed. 

Cameras - Xiaomi smartphone with a triple camera

Picture taken with the front camera of the Redmi 10X
Picture taken with the front camera of the Redmi 10X

Under good light conditions, you can take attractive, but also slightly soft and blurry selfies using the front camera. Particularly the dynamics and color accuracy are at a good level. 

The main camera of the Redmi 10X triple camera system consists of a 48-MP wide angle lens that is based on the Omnivision OV48B according to some reports, which is the same camera sensor used in the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G. The Redmi 10X shows some visible weaknesses under bad light conditions. But also in daylight, the image sharpness offered by the 48-MP camera is a bit low around the edges. However, considering the price range, the images are at a good level.  

The triple camera system is completed by an 8-MP ultra-wide angle lens and a 2-MP sensor that handles the depth sharpness computations. The ultra-wide angle lens shows the typical loss in details and dynamics, but you can also get some usable results under very good light conditions.

Ultra-wide angle
Ultra-wide angle
Main camera
Main camera
2x zoom
2x zoom
10x zoom (max)
10x zoom (max)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraLow LightHauptkameraWeitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
25.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
19 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
32 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G: 31.4 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 47.92 ∆E
ColorChecker
10.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G: 7.11 ∆E min: 2.98 - max: 13.63 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - Xiaomi smartphone with fast charging

Xiaomi includes a modular 22.5-watt charger, a USB cable (Type C to Type A), a protective case, and a SIM tool with the Redmi 10X. In addition, TradingShenzhen which has lent us our review unit, also adds a EU adapter for the outlets used here, as well as a USB-OTG adapter. Both are not included in the standard delivery, but represent an additional service from our vendor.  

The warranty period covers 12 months. If you purchase it from TradingShenzhen, in addition to the manufacturer warranty, you also have the option to send the smartphone to a German address in case you need a warranty repair or replacement during the first 12 months, so you would not need to wait for the time-consuming shipment to China.

Input Devices and Operation - Redmi 10X 5G with a fast fingerprint sensor

The capacitive touchscreen responds accurately to inputs, and the commands are implemented without any delay. The optical in-display fingerprint sensor of the Redmi 10X works very reliably and also very fast, particularly for this price class.  

In addition, you can unlock the display using biometric identification of your face. The face unlock function is also reliable, and the time to unlock turns out comfortably fast in bright light conditions.  

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone

Display - Redmi 10X 5G with AMOLED panel

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The AMOLED display of the 10X 5G offers a Full-HD+ resolution of 2400 x 1080 pixels at a diagonal of 6.57 inches. The pixel density of almost 400 PPI makes the content appear sharp due to the relatively high amount of pixels.

At  622 cd/m², the maximum brightness of the OLED screen is quite bright for an affordable mid-range smartphone. Our more realistic APL50 measurement, which simulates an even distribution of bright and dark areas on the AMOLED panel, results in a very good 786 cd/m².   

Since organic LED's almost never shine with their theoretically-possible maximum brightness, the luminance is reduced accordingly - this happens in the Redmi 10X as well. To control the display brightness, Xiaomi uses pulse width modulation (PWM). 

598
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
608
cd/m²
611
cd/m²
608
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 622 cd/m² Average: 608 cd/m² Minimum: 3.44 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 608 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.291
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.57
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A41
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1
realme 6 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6
Oppo A91
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4
Nokia 5.3
IPS, 1600x720, 6.55
Screen
24%
19%
-30%
-27%
-39%
Brightness middle
608
610
0%
554
-9%
442
-27%
594
-2%
523
-14%
Brightness
608
579
-5%
559
-8%
419
-31%
613
1%
482
-21%
Brightness Distribution
96
92
-4%
92
-4%
90
-6%
89
-7%
86
-10%
Black Level *
0.37
0.37
0.46
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.99
1.8
55%
2
50%
6.1
-53%
6.1
-53%
6.22
-56%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.65
3
74%
7.7
34%
9.7
17%
10.6
9%
10.56
9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
2.5
24%
1.6
52%
5.9
-79%
7
-112%
8
-142%
Gamma
2.291 96%
2.31 95%
2.11 104%
2.35 94%
2.28 96%
2.226 99%
CCT
7023 93%
6864 95%
6589 99%
7631 85%
7370 88%
8856 73%
Contrast
1649
1195
1137

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 227.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 227.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 227.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17495 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

The analysis of the photo spectrometer and CalMAN software finds relative small average Delta-E deviations from the sRGB color space - the ideal target range is below values of 3. The sRGB color space is also covered very well. 

CalMan Color Accuracy (sRGB target color space)
CalMan Color Accuracy (sRGB target color space)
CalMan Color Space (sRGB target color space)
CalMan Color Space (sRGB target color space)
CalMan Grayscale (sRGB target color space)
CalMan Grayscale (sRGB target color space)
CalMan Saturation (sRGB target color space)
CalMan Saturation (sRGB target color space)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Thanks to the organic display having a very high brightness and contrast, its contents can be read outdoors without any trouble. Even in the direct summer sun, contents are still recognizable despite the reflections. The viewing angle stability of the OLED panel is also very good. 

Performance - Xiaomi smartphone with a MediaTek Dimensity 820

The Dimensity 820 is a MediaTek SoC that consists of four fast ARM Cortex A76 cores and four Cortex A55 power saving cores with a clock speed of up to 2 GHz. As the graphics card, the 7-nm chip set integrates a Mali G57. 

The system speed of the Redmi 10X is very good. In everyday operation, everything runs smoothly and there are hardly any stutters at all. Thanks to the very fast UFS 2.1 storage, applications open without any larger delays.  

In combination with 8 GB of LPDDR4x dual-channel storage, the Dimensity 820 in our test unit ensures high performance capabilities. In our comparison field, the Redmi 10X 5G even dominates the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, and a Snapdragon 765G in the Oppo Find X2 Neo is also beat by the Redmi 10X. The values in our CPU benchmark measurements are almost at the level of a Xiaomi Mi 9 with last year's Snapdragon 855 Qualcomm flagship SoC

Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
OpenCL Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3009 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5532 Points ∼100% +84%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3009 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 5532, n=35)
2092 Points ∼38% -30%
Vulkan Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
2456 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4789 Points ∼100% +95%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
2456 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=37)
1810 Points ∼38% -26%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
2678 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points ∼62% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1222 Points ∼43% -54%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1759 Points ∼62% -34%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1475 Points ∼52% -45%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1430 Points ∼50% -47%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1350 Points ∼47% -50%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1854 Points ∼65% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2856 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2787 Points ∼98% +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
2678 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=125)
1943 Points ∼68% -27%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
652 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points ∼61% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
357 Points ∼38% -45%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
567 Points ∼60% -13%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
320 Points ∼34% -51%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
282 Points ∼30% -57%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
312 Points ∼33% -52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
620 Points ∼66% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
742 Points ∼79% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼100% +44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
652 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=125)
554 Points ∼59% -15%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
8214 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4073 Points ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼91% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
8214 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=358)
4916 Points ∼60% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
10658 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5097 Points ∼41% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼88% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12561 Points ∼100% +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
10658 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=421)
5027 Points ∼40% -53%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3022 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1711 Points ∼34% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼71% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4965 Points ∼100% +64%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3022 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=421)
1539 Points ∼31% -49%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
11263 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7829 Points ∼66% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6742 Points ∼57% -40%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
10106 Points ∼86% -10%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8185 Points ∼69% -27%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6775 Points ∼57% -40%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8456 Points ∼72% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼77% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11784 Points ∼100% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
11263 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=528)
5988 Points ∼51% -47%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
16302 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9091 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7594 Points ∼47% -53%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
13777 Points ∼85% -15%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8538 Points ∼52% -48%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9955 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14551 Points ∼89% -11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
16302 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=686)
6572 Points ∼40% -60%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3168 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2721 Points ∼83% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2281 Points ∼69% -28%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2562 Points ∼78% -19%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2304 Points ∼70% -27%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2321 Points ∼71% -27%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2756 Points ∼84% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3122 Points ∼95% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3168 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=179)
2668 Points ∼81% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4427 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2250 Points ∼35% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1005 Points ∼16% -77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2255 Points ∼35% -49%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1103 Points ∼17% -75%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
995 Points ∼16% -78%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3147 Points ∼49% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼90% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6378 Points ∼100% +44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4427 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 9104, n=179)
3070 Points ∼48% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4069 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2340 Points ∼45% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1148 Points ∼22% -72%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2317 Points ∼45% -43%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1248 Points ∼24% -69%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1140 Points ∼22% -72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3065 Points ∼59% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼95% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5178 Points ∼100% +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4069 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=179)
2734 Points ∼53% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3969 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3236 Points ∼76% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2427 Points ∼57% -39%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3067 Points ∼72% -23%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2621 Points ∼61% -34%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼56% -39%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼77% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼88% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4273 Points ∼100% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3969 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=531)
2236 Points ∼52% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4798 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2539 Points ∼31% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1028 Points ∼12% -79%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2558 Points ∼31% -47%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1102 Points ∼13% -77%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼12% -79%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3569 Points ∼43% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼86% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8239 Points ∼100% +72%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4798 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=531)
2174 Points ∼26% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4497 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2667 Points ∼39% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼17% -74%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2656 Points ∼39% -41%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1265 Points ∼19% -72%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1148 Points ∼17% -74%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3501 Points ∼51% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼87% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6830 Points ∼100% +52%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4497 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8386, n=532)
2027 Points ∼30% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4169 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3226 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2466 Points ∼59% -41%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3125 Points ∼75% -25%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2606 Points ∼63% -37%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2396 Points ∼57% -43%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3099 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4127 Points ∼99% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4169 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=563)
2153 Points ∼52% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
5991 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3785 Points ∼37% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1486 Points ∼14% -75%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3835 Points ∼37% -36%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1747 Points ∼17% -71%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1692 Points ∼16% -72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5356 Points ∼52% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9536 Points ∼93% +59%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
5991 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=563)
2928 Points ∼28% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
5469 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3645 Points ∼49% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1630 Points ∼22% -70%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3651 Points ∼49% -33%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1885 Points ∼25% -66%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1810 Points ∼24% -67%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4621 Points ∼62% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7385 Points ∼99% +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
5469 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=563)
2457 Points ∼33% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3963 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3170 Points ∼78% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2296 Points ∼57% -42%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3083 Points ∼76% -22%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2550 Points ∼63% -36%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2476 Points ∼61% -38%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3395 Points ∼84% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼93% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4052 Points ∼100% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3963 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=612)
2114 Points ∼52% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4769 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2356 Points ∼29% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1016 Points ∼12% -79%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼29% -50%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1117 Points ∼14% -77%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼12% -79%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼40% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼78% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8156 Points ∼100% +71%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4769 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9167, n=612)
1833 Points ∼22% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4568 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2499 Points ∼38% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1160 Points ∼17% -75%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2514 Points ∼38% -45%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1276 Points ∼19% -72%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1152 Points ∼17% -75%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼50% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼83% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6658 Points ∼100% +46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4568 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7678, n=613)
1743 Points ∼26% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3745 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3263 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2181 Points ∼57% -42%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3076 Points ∼80% -18%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2568 Points ∼67% -31%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2482 Points ∼65% -34%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼85% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼94% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3846 Points ∼100% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3745 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=655)
1985 Points ∼52% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
5996 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3620 Points ∼36% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1093 Points ∼11% -82%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼37% -39%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1767 Points ∼18% -71%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1663 Points ∼17% -72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5148 Points ∼52% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +66%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9480 Points ∼95% +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
5996 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 13305, n=654)
2430 Points ∼24% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
5267 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3534 Points ∼49% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1229 Points ∼17% -77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3528 Points ∼49% -33%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1899 Points ∼27% -64%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1795 Points ∼25% -66%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4561 Points ∼64% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7152 Points ∼100% +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
5267 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9611, n=657)
2083 Points ∼29% -60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
32166 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20054 Points ∼50% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17231 Points ∼43% -46%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
14849 Points ∼37% -54%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
24514 Points ∼62% -24%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20320 Points ∼51% -37%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19658 Points ∼49% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼64% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
39724 Points ∼100% +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
32166 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=799)
15611 Points ∼39% -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
38974 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
51789 Points ∼49% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
22232 Points ∼21% -43%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
53600 Points ∼50% +38%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23159 Points ∼22% -41%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15403 Points ∼14% -60%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69645 Points ∼65% +79%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +173%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
84533 Points ∼79% +117%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
38974 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=797)
27419 Points ∼26% -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
37153 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38315 Points ∼57% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20885 Points ∼31% -44%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
33926 Points ∼50% -9%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23447 Points ∼35% -37%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24065 Points ∼36% -35%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
44531 Points ∼66% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼92% +67%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
67590 Points ∼100% +82%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
37153 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=797)
21279 Points ∼31% -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
115 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
85 fps ∼51% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
39 fps ∼23% -66%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼51% -26%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
94 fps ∼56% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
145 fps ∼87% +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
115 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=800)
46.1 fps ∼28% -60%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
60 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
37 fps ∼34% -38%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
61 fps ∼55% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
110 fps ∼100% +83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=809)
31.6 fps ∼29% -47%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
71 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼41% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
21 fps ∼21% -70%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
41 fps ∼41% -42%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
56 fps ∼56% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
96 fps ∼96% +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
71 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=705)
27.3 fps ∼27% -62%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
57 fps ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼43% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20 fps ∼22% -65%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
38 fps ∼42% -33%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼56% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼67% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
90 fps ∼100% +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
57 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=713)
22.8 fps ∼25% -60%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
52 fps ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼43% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼19% -75%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼43% -42%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼55% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
65 fps ∼94% +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
52 fps ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=568)
21.9 fps ∼32% -58%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
44 fps ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼48% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼21% -70%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼44% -39%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼56% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼95% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
61 fps ∼100% +39%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
44 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=570)
19.8 fps ∼32% -55%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
18 fps ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼32% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4.9 fps ∼14% -73%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼32% -39%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
4.5 fps ∼13% -75%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.8 fps ∼26% -51%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼38% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼71% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼100% +89%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
18 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=324)
11.5 fps ∼34% -36%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
12 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.9 fps ∼31% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼13% -77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps ∼32% -42%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2.9 fps ∼13% -76%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼13% -77%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼39% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼73% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼100% +83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
12 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=322)
8.13 fps ∼37% -32%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
29 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼35% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼15% -74%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼35% -41%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
7.5 fps ∼15% -74%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
14 fps ∼29% -52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼43% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼76% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49 fps ∼100% +69%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
29 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=328)
17.1 fps ∼35% -41%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
32 fps ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼42% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼17% -77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼44% -41%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8.8 fps ∼20% -72%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼19% -74%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼56% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼95% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
43 fps ∼100% +34%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
32 fps ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=327)
19.7 fps ∼46% -38%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
29 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼43% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼19% -72%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼43% -38%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼50% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
38 fps ∼90% +31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
29 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=493)
14.7 fps ∼35% -49%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
25 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼45% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.7 fps ∼20% -69%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼42% -36%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼50% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼89% +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
25 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=497)
13 fps ∼34% -48%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
401419 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
271934 Points ∼52% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
157473 Points ∼30% -61%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
275464 Points ∼52% -31%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
326795 Points ∼62% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
440822 Points ∼84% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
527820 Points ∼100% +31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
401419 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=122)
322931 Points ∼61% -20%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4420 Score ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1164 Score ∼23% -74%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼100% +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4420 Score ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=89)
2609 Score ∼53% -41%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
1407 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1226 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1062 Points ∼74% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1233 Points ∼86% -12%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1412 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼96% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1439 Points ∼100% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
1407 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=739)
828 Points ∼58% -41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4264 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3757 Points ∼35% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1113 Points ∼10% -74%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3768 Points ∼35% -12%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5216 Points ∼49% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼87% +117%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10646 Points ∼100% +150%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4264 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=739)
2557 Points ∼24% -40%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3996 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4452 Points ∼92% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2148 Points ∼44% -46%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4573 Points ∼94% +14%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4856 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼83% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3811 Points ∼78% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3996 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=739)
1910 Points ∼39% -52%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
7258 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6856 Points ∼76% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5142 Points ∼57% -29%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
6908 Points ∼77% -5%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6685 Points ∼74% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼94% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9024 Points ∼100% +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
7258 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=739)
3510 Points ∼39% -52%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3636 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3444 Points ∼72% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1901 Points ∼40% -48%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3481 Points ∼73% -4%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3931 Points ∼82% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼96% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼100% +32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3636 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=739)
1797 Points ∼38% -51%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.901 Points ∼100% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
45 Points ∼94% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
44.974 Points ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=197)
41 Points ∼86% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
32.643 Points ∼68% -27%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
89.577 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
86.75 Points ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
86.647 Points ∼97%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
86.6 Points ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
55.972 Points ∼62% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=628)
47.8 Points ∼53% -45%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
47.6 runs/min ∼100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
47.6 runs/min ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
45.2 runs/min ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=178)
43.1 runs/min ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
27.8 runs/min ∼58% -42%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
71 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=266)
69.9 Points ∼98% +8%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
67 Points ∼94% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
65 Points ∼92%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
65 Points ∼92% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
52 Points ∼73% -20%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
18974 Points ∼100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
18974 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
17265 Points ∼91% -9%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
17157 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
10499 Points ∼55% -45%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=797)
7984 Points ∼42% -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1854 - 59466, n=823)
9690 ms * ∼100% -220%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
3778.9 ms * ∼39% -25%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
3033.1 ms * ∼31% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
3032.1 ms * ∼31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
3032 ms * ∼31% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
2850.1 ms * ∼29% +6%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProSamsung Galaxy A41realme 6 ProOppo A91Nokia 5.3Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-41%
-44%
-31%
-43%
-45%
-32%
-57%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
63.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
60.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
59 (8.4 - 72.4, n=34)
-9%
51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=536)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
83.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
77.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
77.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
74.4 (13.4 - 88.3, n=34)
-12%
69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=536)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
289.64
112.93
-61%
72.53
-75%
154
-47%
28.55
-90%
45.2
-84%
112 (18.2 - 290, n=63)
-61%
37.1 (0.14 - 319, n=895)
-87%
Random Read 4KB
239.4
122.58
-49%
84
-65%
158.66
-34%
145.64
-39%
109.1
-54%
144 (96.8 - 239, n=63)
-40%
60.3 (1.59 - 324, n=895)
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
479.45
171.09
-64%
211.05
-56%
203.28
-58%
185.26
-61%
243.2
-49%
243 (182 - 511, n=63)
-49%
131 (2.99 - 911, n=895)
-73%
Sequential Read 256KB
999.36
498.15
-50%
299.89
-70%
512.61
-49%
505.44
-49%
299.5
-70%
774 (427 - 999, n=63)
-23%
348 (12.1 - 1802, n=895)
-65%

Games - Xiaomi smartphone with a Mali G57 MP5

The performance of the Mali G57 MP5 allows you to play demanding 3D games without any stutters. Using the GameBench app, we look closer at some demanding games from the Play Store, in order to evaluate the 3D performance of the GPU more accurately. 

The Dead Trigger 2 and PUBG Mobile shooters are reproduced at relatively constant frame rates of 60 fps and 40 fps respectively in high graphic settings. If you slightly reduce the level of details, the native refresh rate of the OLED panel is also used during PUBG Mobile. Even at low details, the Asphalt 9 Legends racing game can only be played at frame rates of 30 fps.

Dead Trigger 2
Dead Trigger 2
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9 Legends
Asphalt 9 Legends
PUBG mobile
010203040506070Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø59.9 (58-61)
; Balanced: Ø40 (39-41)
; HD: Ø40 (39-41)
Dead Trigger 2
010203040506070Tooltip
: Ø60.3 (59-61)
010203040Tooltip
: Ø29.8 (25-31)

Emissions - Redmi 10X with slight throttling

Temperature

Under load, the case of the Redmi smartphone warms up relatively unevenly, but the maximum temperatures we measured are still within a safe range. However, the heat development inside the Redmi 10 X leads to a slight throttling of the MediaTek SoC performance. The Manhattan 3.1 test of the GFXBench app shows that with increasing load the frame rate drops by about 15%. 

Max. Load
 43.5 °C
110 F
41.3 °C
106 F
37.4 °C
99 F
 
 42.6 °C
109 F
41 °C
106 F
37.4 °C
99 F
 
 41.3 °C
106 F
39.7 °C
103 F
37.7 °C
100 F
 
Maximum: 43.5 °C = 110 F
Average: 40.2 °C = 104 F
32.8 °C
91 F
39.2 °C
103 F
40.7 °C
105 F
33.7 °C
93 F
39.2 °C
103 F
40 °C
104 F
34.2 °C
94 F
39 °C
102 F
39.5 °C
103 F
Maximum: 40.7 °C = 105 F
Average: 37.6 °C = 100 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.5 °C = 109 F | Room Temperature 21.9 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Speaker

Pink Noise speaker test
Pink Noise speaker test

The Redmi 10X uses only a single speaker that is fairly quiet compared to the competitors. We measure a maximum volume of only 80.5 dB(A). Our measurements of the Xiaomi smartphone also show a frequency curve that is hardly linear for the mids, and the highs also drop down significantly. Bass is not present in the sound spectrum. However, in everyday listening, the quality of the speaker is sufficient for videos and movies. 

Those who want better sound output can use a wired or wireless headphone solution. In addition to the classic 3.5-mm audio port, the Bluetooth 5.0 standard is supported. 

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.538.52536.236.63127.326.44033.536.35033.434.56323.524.68022.619.81002223.112520.824.416017.936.920013.341.425012.24531512.249.940012.455.150013.459.863013.464.980017.666.5100016.670.6125014.369.1160012.569.720001367.7250013.864.4315014.857.2400016.661.6500017.367.5630018.271.980001975.31000019.668.31250019.655.51600020.352.3SPL57.366.228.380.5N11.119.5146.9median 16.6median 61.6Delta2.710.734.829.419.6