Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M1 Pro vs Intel Core i5-10500H vs Intel Core i5-10400H

Apple M1 Pro

► remove from comparison Apple M1 Pro

The Apple M1 Pro is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2021 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers  all 10 cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores with 600 - 3220 MHz) and two power-efficiency cores (E-cores with 600 - 2064 MHz). There is no Turbo Boost for single cores or short burst periods. The cores are similar to the cores in the Apple M1. The entry level model offers only 8 cores.

The big cores (codename Firestorm) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 24 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB in the M1). The four efficiency cores (codename Icestorm) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 24 MB SLC (System Level Cache). The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with 600 - 2064 MHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with 600 - 3228 MHz.

The unified memory (16 or 32 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 256 bit memory controller (200 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 Pro offers all 16 cores.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine, a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including ProRes).

The M1 Pro is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC and integrates 33.7 billion transistors. The peak power consumption of the chip was advertised around 30W for CPU intensive tasks. In the Prime95 benchmark the chip uses in our tests (with a MBP16) 33.6W package power and 31W for the CPU part. In idle the SoC only reports 1W package power.

Intel Core i5-10500H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10500H

The Intel Core i5-10500H is a fast processor for laptops with six cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.5 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on a 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced on the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10500H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, a noticeably less power-hungry processor, in multi-thread performance making the i5 a somewhat underwhelming option as far as H-class processors go.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is, and how high the CPU power limits are.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a  low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W. Laptop makers are free to reduce that value slightly, 35 W being the minimum Intel-recommended value, resulting in lower clock speed and lower performance. Either way, an active cooling solution will still be needed to dissipate the heat.

The i5-10500H is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-10400H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400H

The Intel Core i5-10400H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.6 GHz (up to 4.4 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10400H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP. 

Performance

The performance should be slightly better than the old Core i7-8809G (Quad-Core 3.1 - 4.2) which was the fastest mobile quad core by Intel.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a  low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelApple M1 ProIntel Core i5-10500HIntel Core i5-10400H
SeriesApple Apple M-SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Apple M1 Max2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores48 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro « 2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Apple M12.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H « 2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2064 - 3220 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz2600 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache2.9 MB384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache28 MB1 MB
L3 Cache24 MB12 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 106 / 124 / 8
Transistors33700 Million
Technology5 nm14 nm14 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86x86
Announced
CodenameComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1440FCBGA1440
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10500H
32.9 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400H
31.8 pt (44%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
100%
1 M1 Pro +
112 Points (78%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 M1 Pro +
824 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 M1 Pro +
12370 Points (11%)
min: 6820     avg: 7104     median: 7103.5 (7%)     max: 7387 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 M1 Pro +
1534 Points (65%)
min: 1158     avg: 1160     median: 1159.5 (49%)     max: 1161 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
393 Points (44%)
min: 446     avg: 448     median: 448 (50%)     max: 450 Points
471 Points (52%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2721 Points (7%)
min: 2842     avg: 2919     median: 2919 (7%)     max: 2996 Points
1924 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1690 Points (11%)
min: 1209     avg: 1249     median: 1249 (8%)     max: 1289 Points
796 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
209 Points (63%)
min: 184.5     avg: 186.3     median: 186.3 (56%)     max: 188 Points
192 Points (58%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
13.8 Points (18%)
9.6 Points (13%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (52%)
2.2 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7109 Points (43%)
7403 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
37125 Points (27%)
25731 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
281 s (3%)
801 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
9.1 s (2%)
24.9 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6194 Points (10%)
4115 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 33075     avg: 33445     median: 33445 (19%)     max: 33815 MIPS
23136 MIPS (13%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4874     avg: 4886     median: 4885.5 (58%)     max: 4897 MIPS
4766 MIPS (57%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
77.8 fps (27%)
49.1 fps (17%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
227.5 fps (52%)
191.4 fps (44%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (17%)     max: 9.73 fps
6.1 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (0%)
0.6 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (16%)
0.9 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.1 GB/s (11%)
5.3 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
183.3 Seconds (1%)
min: 382     avg: 385.5     median: 385.5 (3%)     max: 389 Seconds
565 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.634     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.645 sec
0.6 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
11157 Points (24%)
9578 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.6 s (2%)
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
485.6 s (2%)
484.5 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11219     avg: 12299     median: 12299 (33%)     max: 13379 Points
8007 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10881     avg: 11086     median: 11085.5 (28%)     max: 11290 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16551     avg: 17052     median: 17051.5 (30%)     max: 17552 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6016     avg: 6390     median: 6389.5 (27%)     max: 6763 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 M1 Pro +
2409 Points (65%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 M1 Pro +
12440 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1768 Points (75%)
min: 1181     avg: 1202     median: 1205.5 (51%)     max: 1214 Points
1245 Points (53%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12499 Points (22%)
min: 5550     avg: 6139     median: 6332 (11%)     max: 6340 Points
4332 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1200 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6233 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5501 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25696 Points (28%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
405.4 ms (0%)
min: 813     avg: 819     median: 818.5 (1%)     max: 824 ms
787 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 M1 Pro +
75.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 M1 Pro +
66203 Points (60%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 M1 Pro +
342 Points (71%)
min: 218     avg: 223.5     median: 223.5 (47%)     max: 229 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 M1 Pro +
1556 Points (60%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Pro +
41.5 Watt (7%)
min: 93.3     avg: 99.2     median: 99.2 (17%)     max: 105 Watt
67.4 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Pro +
48.3 Watt (9%)
min: 105.9     avg: 115.5     median: 115.5 (21%)     max: 125 Watt
75.9 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 M1 Pro +
19.9 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Pro +
6.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 M1 Pro +
9.9 Watt (11%)
7.8 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 M1 Pro +
35 Points per Watt (26%)
min: 10.3     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (8%)     max: 11.4 Points per Watt
10.5 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M1 Pro → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10500H → 88% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400H → 79% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 01. 19:48:29

#0 checking url part for id 13845 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13217 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11958 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13845 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 13845 +0.009s ... 0.043s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13217 +0.017s ... 0.06s

#10 got single benchmarks 13217 +0.015s ... 0.075s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11958 +0.014s ... 0.089s

#12 got single benchmarks 11958 +0.009s ... 0.098s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.098s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.273s ... 0.371s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.371s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)