Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

Intel Core 7 240H

► remove from comparison Intel Core 7 240H

The Intel Core 7 240H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops of the Raptor Lake-H series (based on the Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in late 2024 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 of the 8 efficient cores possible (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading for 16 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rates range from 2.5 to 5.2 GHz (single-core boost) on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 4 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (comparable to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the older Core i7-13620H, the Core 7 240H offers higher clock speeds (especially Turbo Boost) and support for DDR5-5600.

Performance

Thanks to the improved clock speeds, the Core 7 240H should be able to slightly best the old i7-13620H. Still, the faster i7 models of the 13th gen offer more E-cores and therefore a clearly better multi-threaded performance.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5600 (up from DDR5-5200 of the 12th gen.). The Thread Director (in hardware) can help the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 64 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) possible, clocked at up to 1.5GHz.

Power consumption

The Core 7 240H is rated at a TDP of 55W (PL1, 115W PL2) and is manufactured on an improved 10nm process (Intel 7) that allows for higher clock speeds compared to the 12th gen CPUs.

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 255H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 16 cores consisting of 6 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5.1 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.4 GHz clock speed and two additional "low power" efficiency cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 28 watt (PL1, 115W PL2).

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card which offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.25 GHz.

Performance - High End

The Core Ultra 7 is superior to the top model Core Ultra 9 285H as only the maximum Turbo frequency is 200 MHz lower. Due to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should perform slightly below the level of the old Raptor Lake Core Core 9 270H (6 + 8 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU very suitable for demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Chiplet design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile from Intel using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also is produced at TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile are also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

ModelIntel Core 7 240HIntel Core Ultra 7 255H
CodenameRaptor Lake-H RefreshArrow Lake-H
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HIntel Arrow Lake
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-H
Intel Core 9 270H compare2 - 5.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core 7 250H compare1.8 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core 7 240H « 1.8 - 5.2 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core 5 220H compare2 - 4.9 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core 5 210H compare1.6 - 4.8 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H compare4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H « 4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H compare4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Clock1800 - 5200 MHz4400 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache864 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB26 MB
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 16
6 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
4 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
16 / 16
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core
8 x 4.4 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt115 Watt
Technology10 nm3 nm
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesThread Director
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1550 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comark.intel.com
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT8
Chip AI96 TOPS INT8
$514 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core 7 240H
39.4 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 255H
42.1 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 108.9     avg: 111.2     median: 111.2 (56%)     max: 113.5 Points
min: 119     avg: 123.6     median: 123.5 (62%)     max: 128.1 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 819     avg: 881     median: 881 (16%)     max: 943 Points
min: 750     avg: 973     median: 950 (18%)     max: 1197 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14686     avg: 15637     median: 15637 (15%)     max: 16588 Points
min: 16105     avg: 18399     median: 17812 (17%)     max: 22578 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1831     avg: 1868     median: 1868 (76%)     max: 1905 Points
min: 1874     avg: 2061     median: 2079 (85%)     max: 2152 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 703     avg: 717     median: 716.5 (78%)     max: 730 Points
min: 748     avg: 793     median: 801.5 (87%)     max: 826 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5648     avg: 6017     median: 6017 (15%)     max: 6386 Points
min: 6356     avg: 7221     median: 6973.5 (17%)     max: 8860 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2318     avg: 2450     median: 2450 (15%)     max: 2582 Points
min: 2414     avg: 2865     median: 2835 (18%)     max: 3444 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 264     avg: 270     median: 270 (75%)     max: 276 Points
min: 258     avg: 304.7     median: 309 (86%)     max: 322 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
31.3 Points (41%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (90%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11500 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
65269 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
96508 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17883 Points (22%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
319.3 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7777 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 57234     avg: 61146     median: 61146 (35%)     max: 65058 MIPS
min: 42155     avg: 57634     median: 56815 (33%)     max: 68652 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5851     avg: 6012     median: 6011.5 (71%)     max: 6172 MIPS
min: 4589     avg: 5855     median: 5963 (70%)     max: 6385 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
154.7 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
354.5 fps (9%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.9     avg: 18     median: 18 (32%)     max: 19 fps
min: 13.7     avg: 20.7     median: 20.9 (37%)     max: 26.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.3 GB/s (22%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 339     avg: 361     median: 361 (5%)     max: 383 Seconds
min: 256     avg: 343.2     median: 332 (4%)     max: 492 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 195     avg: 209     median: 209 (1%)     max: 223 Seconds
min: 157     avg: 206.6     median: 199.5 (1%)     max: 293 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4329     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4805 sec
min: 0.4233     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.515 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14666     avg: 14844     median: 14843.5 (32%)     max: 15021 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 79410     avg: 80381     median: 80381 (62%)     max: 81352 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21914     avg: 24061     median: 24061 (59%)     max: 26208 Points
min: 17409     avg: 21142     median: 20853 (51%)     max: 24715 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 106965     avg: 111352     median: 111352 (90%)     max: 115738 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 106511     avg: 111384     median: 111384 (90%)     max: 116256 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 108898     avg: 112983     median: 112983 (91%)     max: 117068 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13466     avg: 19590     median: 19835.5 (50%)     max: 23195 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27077     avg: 29611     median: 29611 (53%)     max: 32145 Points
min: 22456     avg: 30609     median: 29389 (52%)     max: 37837 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11809     avg: 12893     median: 12893 (54%)     max: 13977 Points
min: 6177     avg: 11207     median: 11307 (48%)     max: 13757 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2601     avg: 2632     median: 2646 (61%)     max: 2648 Points
min: 2712     avg: 2846     median: 2866 (66%)     max: 2925 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 11285     avg: 12604     median: 12846 (50%)     max: 13681 Points
min: 11979     avg: 15219     median: 14990 (58%)     max: 17489 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1837     avg: 1850     median: 1849.5 (62%)     max: 1862 Points
min: 1938     avg: 2045     median: 2045 (69%)     max: 2121 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10558     avg: 11417     median: 11417 (20%)     max: 12276 Points
min: 11348     avg: 14627     median: 14330.5 (26%)     max: 17218 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2094 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13465 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8697 Points (87%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
50379 Points (49%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 494     avg: 519     median: 518.5 (1%)     max: 543 ms
min: 427     avg: 455.4     median: 454 (1%)     max: 510 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 112005     avg: 117358     median: 117689 (78%)     max: 122048 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 261     avg: 269.5     median: 269.5 (70%)     max: 278 Points
min: 247     avg: 291.7     median: 298 (78%)     max: 317 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
295 Points (53%)
min: 273     avg: 310.6     median: 313 (56%)     max: 331 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1792     avg: 1904     median: 1904 (71%)     max: 2016 Points
min: 1610     avg: 1898     median: 1935.5 (72%)     max: 2058 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 99.7     avg: 131.2     median: 131.2 (23%)     max: 162.6 Watt
min: 40.3     avg: 79.1     median: 59.2 (10%)     max: 142.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 109     avg: 132.8     median: 132.8 (24%)     max: 156.5 Watt
min: 59.7     avg: 91.9     median: 69.9 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.01     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (3%)     max: 5.85 Watt
min: 3.5     avg: 7.9     median: 7.7 (5%)     max: 15.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.83     avg: 5.6     median: 5.6 (4%)     max: 7.42 Watt
min: 3.6     avg: 18.5     median: 9 (7%)     max: 137.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 16.5     avg: 18.9     median: 18.9 (14%)     max: 21.3 Points per Watt
min: 20.5     avg: 34.2     median: 39.5 (29%)     max: 43.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 7 240H → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 255H → 108% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 09. 07:13:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18675 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18903 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765260786s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 07 Dec 2025 05:18:56 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18675 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 18675 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18903 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 18903 +0.018s ... 0.039s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.081s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.083s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)