Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N3350 vs AMD A9-9425

Intel Celeron N3350

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3350 is an Apollo Lake family, dual-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its two cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.4 GHz; these are not Hyper-Threading-enabled meaning there are no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 500, and eats very little (~6 W).

Amusingly enough, Intel keeps making and selling the Celeron as of late 2022, albeit the price has dropped from about $100 to about $20 per unit making the CPU even more popular with ultra-budget nettop and laptop makers.

Architecture & Features

Just like other Celeron N, Celeron J, Pentium N, Pentium J processors, this Celeron is notable for its small die size. It is easy to manufacture, lowering the costs and enabling Intel to compete with various ARM-based products (hello, Raspberry Pi).

The Celeron N3350 features the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture. This replaces the dated Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements and making for a double-digit IPC improvement. There is still no L3 cache to be found here, however, it now takes less cycles to perform many operations.

The Celeron is compatible with DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 RAM. Intel's guidelines state that up to 8 GB are supported; that being said, various forum users report that the CPU functions just fine if mated to 16 GB and even 32 GB of RAM. The chip features six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes for connecting various devices, meaning a four-lane NVMe SSD will not be able to deliver a data transfer rate of more than 2 GB/s. eMMC and SATA storage is supported natively, too.

This Intel CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. However, Microsoft only allows Windows 11 to be installed on systems with CPUs released in 2017 or later, making 64-bit Windows 10 the only OS that the Celeron is officially compatible with.

Last but not the least, please keep in mind that this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1296 socket interface).

Performance

The average N3350 in our database is just as fast as the Atom x5-Z8300 and the Core 2 Duo SU7300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is not fast at all. In fact, the two cores of this Celeron trail behind a single core of any half-decent CPU such as Intel's very own Core i3-7130U. A proper x86 CPU, Celeron N3350 will let you run nearly any Windows app, the caveat being that you will have to wait for several seconds every time you click on something. Windows 10 takes nearly a minute to fully boot with this CPU.

Graphics

The Intel HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is the highlight of this little Celeron. As far as the feature set is concerned, the HD Graphics 500 is not much different from the HD Graphics 520 or any other graphics adapter that full-blown six-generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 chips have. This iGPU is compatible with DX12; it will drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 2160p60. It will happily decode VP9 and AVC-encoded videos, too. These are the two codecs that YouTube mostly relies on, as of 2021.

It's not all roses and sunshine. To keep power consumption under control, the number of Execution Units was reduced to 12 (the HD Graphics 520 has 24 EUs at its disposal, for reference). Besides, the UHD Graphics runs at up to 650 MHz which is not a lot. Very few games will be playable on this graphics solution - mostly, ones that were released in the 2000s or even in the 1990s.

Power consumption

The Celeron's default TDP (also known as the Power Limit 1) is 6 W, making it a great option for passively cooled systems. Increasing the PL1 by one or two watts, which many systems built around Apollo Lake allow one to do, makes for a much more responsive user experience, speaking subjectively.

Energy efficiency isn't great here, as Intel's 14 nm processes are very old as of mid 2022.

AMD A9-9425

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9425

The AMD A9-9425 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2018. Compared to the one year older A9-9420, the 9425 has a 100 MHz higher CPU clock speed (base and boost) as well as a marginally faster iGPU. It integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked at 3.1 GHz to 3.7 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders at up to 900 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video decoder and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The average 9425 in our database proves to be a rather slow CPU, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Intel Core i3-4012Y. Much like it is with N-class Intel chips, expect a system built around an A9-9425 to perform poorly in all but the most basic tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) GPU has 192 active shader units (3 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above.

Power consumption

This A9 series chip has a default TDP of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to reduce that somewhat with 10 W being the minimum AMD-recommended value; clock speeds and performance will be reduced as a result. By going for the lowest value, it will be possible to build a passively cooled system around the APU.

Last but not the least, the AMD A9-9425 is manufactured on a 28 nm process for very, very low energy efficiency, as of 2022.

ModelIntel Celeron N3350AMD A9-9425
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameApollo LakeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
Intel Celeron J3455 compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 compare1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9425 « 3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1100 - 2400 MHz3100 - 3700 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP6 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1296
FeaturesDDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AESDDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 650 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$24 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
Transistors1200 Million
Die Size124.5 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N3350
11.6 pt (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
328 Points (0%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
252 Points (11%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 100     avg: 103.5     median: 103.5 (12%)     max: 107 Points
195 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 151     avg: 170.5     median: 170.5 (0%)     max: 190 Points
284 Points (1%)
125 Points (1%)
76 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.07     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.12 Points
1.5 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (15%)     max: 0.6 Points
0.9 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1458     avg: 1570     median: 1490 (9%)     max: 1917 Points
2686 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1775     avg: 2505     median: 2654 (2%)     max: 2787 Points
4338 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1225     avg: 1300     median: 1258 (15%)     max: 1418 s
802 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 42.2     avg: 46.1     median: 45.5 (9%)     max: 50.6 s
25.8 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
616 Points (1%)
891 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 2692     avg: 2980     median: 2979.5 (2%)     max: 3267 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 1653     avg: 1724     median: 1723.5 (21%)     max: 1794 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
6.2 fps (2%)
9.7 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
32.5 fps (7%)
50.5 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 0.63     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.65 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.7 GB/s (2%)
1 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 6275     avg: 6276     median: 6276 (44%)     max: 6277 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 2.21     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (50%)     max: 2.433 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1624     avg: 1655     median: 1654.5 (4%)     max: 1685 Points
2314 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27.5     avg: 29.2     median: 27.5 (6%)     max: 32.5 s
17 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.2     avg: 64.5     median: 61.2 (3%)     max: 71.1 s
38.2 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1515     avg: 1532     median: 1538 (7%)     max: 1543 s
853 s (4%)
1527 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 11556     avg: 12344     median: 12344 (10%)     max: 13132 Points
16539 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 11665     avg: 12042     median: 12041.5 (10%)     max: 12418 Points
15856 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 10653     avg: 12775     median: 13161.5 (11%)     max: 14698 Points
19290 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 941     avg: 986     median: 978.5 (2%)     max: 1029 Points
1269 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1293     avg: 1412     median: 1412 (3%)     max: 1501 Points
1823 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 A9-9425 +
705 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 310     avg: 320     median: 320 (14%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 591     avg: 606     median: 605.5 (1%)     max: 620 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
309 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
587 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1374     avg: 1473     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1529 Points
2244 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2427     avg: 2599     median: 2619.5 (3%)     max: 2731 Points
3636 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1464     avg: 1491     median: 1500 (20%)     max: 1510 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2529     avg: 2589     median: 2589 (6%)     max: 2648 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2409     avg: 2468     median: 2467.5 (4%)     max: 2526 Points
3323 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1314     avg: 1328     median: 1327.5 (26%)     max: 1341 Points
2039 Points (40%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A9-9425 +
3605 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A9-9425 +
2228 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 A9-9425 +
4145 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 A9-9425 +
3069 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 A9-9425 +
5175 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 A9-9425 +
4798 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 A9-9425 +
4518 Points (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3108     avg: 3519     median: 3443 (4%)     max: 4230 ms
2466 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 255     avg: 370.3     median: 299.2 (3%)     max: 628 ms
176.3 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8457     avg: 9831     median: 9492.5 (9%)     max: 11461 Points
13562 Points (12%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 49.2     avg: 55.4     median: 52.2 (11%)     max: 68 Points
76 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3574 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
7138 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5377 Points (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
7007 Points (35%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.5 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3350 → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9425 → 140% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 00:09:13

#0 checking url part for id 8185 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11291 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:39:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8185 +0.015s ... 0.063s

#7 got single benchmarks 8185 +0.07s ... 0.133s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11291 +0.003s ... 0.136s

#9 got single benchmarks 11291 +0.012s ... 0.148s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.148s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.268s ... 0.416s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.439s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)