Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A6-9220 vs Intel Core i7-7700K

AMD A6-9220

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9220

The AMD A6-9220 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The 9210 is a mid-range Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.5 - 2.9 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 655 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock range, the A6-9220 should be noticeably slower than the A9-9410. In the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark e.g. it was around 15% slower in our benchmarks (see below). The single core benchmarks were quite similar overall.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 655 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9220 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

Intel Core i7-7700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7700K

The Intel Core i7-7700K is a fast quad-core processor for desktops based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the top model of the consumer Kaby-Lake-H series at the time of the announcement. Besides four cores including Hyper-Threading (8 threads) support running at 4.2 - 4.5 GHz, the processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Thanks to the 200 (base) and 300 MHz (Boost) higher clock speed, respectively, the i7-7700K is a few percent faster than the old Skylake Core i7-6700K that offers the same per-MHz performance. Therefore, it is a very fast quad-core CPU that offers sufficient performance for all tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1150 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency slightly. Intel still specifies the TDP with 91 Watts, which is a lot more than the 45 Watts of the mobile Kaby-Lake-H CPUs.

ModelAMD A6-9220Intel Core i7-7700K
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameStoney RidgeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 « 2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K « 4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2500 - 2900 MHz4200 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache160 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 8
TDP10-15 Watt91 Watt
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C
SocketBGAFCLGA1151
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.com
L3 Cache8 MB
$339 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
465 Points (52%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2200 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 109     avg: 111.5     median: 111.5 (1%)     max: 114 Points
min: 897     avg: 940     median: 938.5 (6%)     max: 984 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 68     avg: 68.5     median: 68.5 (21%)     max: 69 Points
min: 190     avg: 192.3     median: 192.5 (58%)     max: 194 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.4 Points (2%)
min: 9.78     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (13%)     max: 10.91 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (20%)
min: 2.18     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (54%)     max: 2.2 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2432 Points (15%)
min: 7222     avg: 7305     median: 7304.5 (44%)     max: 7387 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3941 Points (3%)
min: 28189     avg: 28903     median: 28903 (21%)     max: 29617 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
915 s (11%)
min: 169.8     avg: 173.1     median: 173.1 (2%)     max: 176.3 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
27.7 s (6%)
min: 5.5     avg: 5.6     median: 5.6 (1%)     max: 5.615 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
770 Points (1%)
5823 Points (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
8.7 fps (3%)
61.6 fps (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
46.5 fps (11%)
230 fps (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.54     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.554 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.919     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (16%)     max: 0.939 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
min: 5.4     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.5 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2253 Points (5%)
10156 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
20.9 s (5%)
min: 8.11     avg: 8.2     median: 8.2 (2%)     max: 8.22 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
46.9 s (2%)
min: 18.3     avg: 18.4     median: 18.4 (1%)     max: 18.41 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1022 s (5%)
440 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 A6-9220 +
4236 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1467     avg: 1470     median: 1469.5 (4%)     max: 1472 Points
min: 9975     avg: 11450     median: 11813 (32%)     max: 12026 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
16010 Points (13%)
min: 64424     avg: 65351     median: 65408 (53%)     max: 66220 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
15125 Points (12%)
66177 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
15704 Points (13%)
67714 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1241 Points (3%)
min: 9230     avg: 9587     median: 9558 (24%)     max: 9974 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1721 Points (3%)
min: 13137     avg: 13702     median: 13672.5 (24%)     max: 14325 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
634 Points (3%)
min: 5276     avg: 5383     median: 5383 (23%)     max: 5490 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A6-9220 +
1960 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A6-9220 +
2857 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1885 Points (26%)
5480 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2805 Points (7%)
17800 Points (43%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A6-9220 +
2921 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A6-9220 +
1798 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3115 Points (5%)
18800 Points (29%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1909 Points (29%)
4700 Points (70%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3245 Points (26%)
12169 Points (98%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2855 Points (26%)
10472 Points (95%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3510 Points (7%)
17576 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3822 Points (8%)
17183 Points (35%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3461 Points (9%)
15476 Points (40%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2416 ms (3%)
769 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
162.1 ms (2%)
52 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 A6-9220 +
14724 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
145 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
127 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
7.8 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-9220 → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7700K → 451% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 01. 11:41:18

#0 checking url part for id 9326 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8421 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.039s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9326 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#7 got single benchmarks 9326 +0.011s ... 0.054s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8421 +0.003s ... 0.057s

#9 got single benchmarks 8421 +0.017s ... 0.073s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.241s ... 0.315s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.337s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)