Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A10-9620P vs Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6

AMD A10-9620P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-9620P

The AMD A10-9620P is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.5 - 3.4 GHz. In our tests the A10-9620P even hit 3.6 GHz.

It was announced in 2017 and is based on the same silicon as Carrizo but with more and refined features. It is a ULV-chip with a TDP of 15 Watt and integrates a Radeon R5 graphics card (384 shader cores / 6 compute cores) and a dual-channel DDR4-18600 memory controller. As Carrizo its a full featured SoC that offers all I/O ports on the chip.

The A10-9620P is a bit faster than the old 15-Watt top model of Carrizo, the FX-8800P. See our Bristol Ridge article for more information on the architecture and improvements compared to Carrizo.

Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6

► remove from comparison Intel E3-1505M v6

The Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 is a fast quad-core processor notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the second fastest mobile Xeon model and the performance is slightly better tha the 100 MHz slower clocked consumer Core i7-7820HQ. Compared to the Core processors, the chip also supports ECC-RAM (error correction). Besides four cores including Hyper-Threading support running at 3 - 4 GHz (4 cores up to 3.6 GHz, 2 cores up to 3.8 GHz), the processor is also equipped with the professional HD Graphics P630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Thanks to the higher clocks, even the smaller model of the mobile Xeons is ahead of the fastest Skylake models (Xeon E3-1575M v6) and is therefore als powerful enough for very demanding applications.

Graphics

The integrated professional Intel HD Graphics P630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1100 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory. It offers certified drivers for 15 professional and CAD applications.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

 

ModelAMD A10-9620PIntel Xeon E3-1505M v6
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameBristol RidgeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD FX-9830P compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P « 2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 « 3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2500 - 3400 MHz3000 - 4000 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 8
TDP15 Watt45 Watt
Transistors3100 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
SocketFP4
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, SIPP, vPro, TXT
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)Intel HD Graphics P630 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
L1 Cache256 KB
L3 Cache8 MB
$623 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
230 Points (1%)
min: 654     avg: 728     median: 737 (5%)     max: 792 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
72 Points (22%)
min: 170     avg: 170.3     median: 170 (51%)     max: 171 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.7 Points (3%)
min: 7.89     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (11%)     max: 8.61 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (20%)
1.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2277 Points (14%)
6332 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
7420 Points (5%)
23780 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
470.9 s (6%)
min: 319     avg: 327.2     median: 327.2 (4%)     max: 335.3 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14.4 s (3%)
min: 11     avg: 11     median: 11 (2%)     max: 11.02 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1329 Points (2%)
min: 3986     avg: 4554     median: 4554 (7%)     max: 5122 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
16.3 fps (6%)
min: 48     avg: 48.5     median: 48.5 (17%)     max: 49.05 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
76.6 fps (18%)
185 fps (43%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.4 GB/s (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7230     avg: 7714     median: 7713.5 (16%)     max: 8197 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.2 s (4%)
min: 9     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (2%)     max: 10 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
40.3 s (2%)
min: 20     avg: 21.5     median: 21.5 (1%)     max: 23 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
977 s (4%)
min: 489     avg: 509     median: 508.5 (2%)     max: 528 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
2399 Points (6%)
min: 9594     avg: 9882     median: 9813 (27%)     max: 10239 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
22553 Points (18%)
44564 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
24032 Points (19%)
42023 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 52711     avg: 53987     median: 53987 (45%)     max: 55263 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2338 Points (6%)
min: 4304     avg: 6891     median: 8126 (21%)     max: 8243 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
3175 Points (6%)
min: 6294     avg: 9708     median: 11348 (20%)     max: 11483 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4282 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
14680 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4042 Points (79%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
15367 Points (24%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4224 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 847     avg: 884     median: 897 (1%)     max: 907 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 36239     avg: 39903     median: 39902.5 (36%)     max: 43566 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
81.1 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
78.7 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.1 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-9620P → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 → 241% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 03:02:48

#0 checking url part for id 9188 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8448 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9188 +0.003s ... 0.039s

#7 got single benchmarks 9188 +0.012s ... 0.051s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8448 +0.004s ... 0.054s

#9 got single benchmarks 8448 +0.021s ... 0.076s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.254s ... 0.33s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.355s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)