Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-720QM vs Intel Core i7-640M vs Intel Core i7-620M

Intel Core i7-720QM

► remove from comparison Intel 720QM

The Intel Core i7 720QM is a fast quad-core CPU and slowest Core i7 quad core in 2009. It features 4 cores (quad core CPU) and Hyperthreading. Therefore, 8 threads can be worked on simultaneously. Compared to the faster Core i7 mobile CPUs, the 720QM only features 6MB L3 Cache (the faster ones 8 MB).

Because of the Turbo Mode, the CPU is clocked with up to 2.8 GHz and therefore fast for single core applications like older games. Thanks to the 4 cores (and 8 threads), modern multi-threaded applications also profit from this CPU greatly (altough when using all cores, the clock speed remains low).

The Core i7 7xx line has an integrated memory controller for DDR3 bars (1066 or 1333). Therefore, the memory performance is very good (compared to older CPUs with external memory controllers). Still this also leads to the higher TDP of the whole chip.

The power consumption of up to 45 Watt (TDP) is quite high for a laptop CPU and because of the Turbo Mode, the power consumption could reach these high values. Therefore, only large laptops with good cooling solutions can house this CPU.

Intel Core i7-640M

► remove from comparison Intel 640M

The Intel Core i7-640M is a high end dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.8 to 3.46 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Therefore, the i7-640M is related to the other i5 and i3 dual core CPUs and not the quad-core i7 CPUs.

A feature of the new Core i7-640M is the integrated graphics card called Intel HD Graphics (GMA HD) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions. Compared to the slower i5 versions without AES features, the 3DMark Vantage Communication Score showed a significant increase with AES enabled CPUs.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is clocked with 500-733 MHz and performs clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a bit faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now).

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone).

The Core i7-640M should not be mistaken with the similar named but slower low voltage Core i7-640LM and Core i7-640UM models.

Intel Core i7-620M

► remove from comparison Intel 620M

The Intel Core i7-620M is a high end dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.66 to 3.33 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Therefore, the i7-620M is related to the other i5 and i3 dual core CPUs and not the quad-core i7 CPUs.

A feature of the new Core i7-620M is the integrated graphics card called Intel HD Graphics (GMA HD) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i7-620M is on average above the former fastest mobile dual core CPU, the Core 2 Duo T9900 / X9100. In our tests, just the single threaded rendering test in the Cinebench R10 benchmark scored less points. Even the mobile Core i7-720QM quad core is slower in many cases. 

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions. Compared to the slower i5 versions without AES features, the 3DMark Vantage Communication Score showed a significant increase with AES enabled CPUs.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is clocked with 500-733 MHz and performs clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a bit faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now).

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone).

The Core i7-620M should not be mistaken with the similar named but slower low voltage and ultra low voltage chips Core i7-620LM (2.13-2.93 GHZ, 25W) and Core i7-620UM (1.2-2.26 GHz, 18 W).

ModelIntel Core i7-720QMIntel Core i7-640MIntel Core i7-620M
CodenameClarksfieldArrandaleArrandale
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i7Intel Core i7
Series: Core i7 Arrandale
Intel Core i7-940XM2.13 - 3.33 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-920XM2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-840QM1.86 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-820QM1.73 - 3.06 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-740QM1.73 - 2.93 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-720QM « 1.6 - 2.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-640M « 2.8 - 3.46 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-620M2.66 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-660LM2.27 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-640LM2.13 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-620LM2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-680UM1.47 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-660UM1.33 - 2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-640UM1.2 - 2.27 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-620UM1.06 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-640M2.8 - 3.46 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-620M « 2.66 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-660LM2.27 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-640LM2.13 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-620LM2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-680UM1.47 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-660UM1.33 - 2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-640UM1.2 - 2.27 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-620UM1.06 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1600 - 2800 MHz2800 - 3460 MHz2660 - 3333 MHz
FSB250025002500
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 42 / 4
TDP45 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors774 Million382+177 Million382+177 Million
Technology45 nm32 nm32 nm
Die Size296 mm281+114 mm281+114 mm2
SocketRPGA989BGA1288, PGA988BGA1288, PGA988
Architecturex86x86x86
$546 U.S.$346 U.S.$332 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
FeaturesTurbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 500-733MHz, Dual Channel DDR3 memory controllerTurbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 500-733MHz, Dual Channel DDR3 memory controller

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.58     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (4%)     max: 2.99 Points
min: 2.4     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.63 Points
min: 2.2     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (3%)     max: 2.53 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 640M +
1.1 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2231     avg: 3109     median: 2995 (18%)     max: 3757 Points
124%
640M +
min: 3597     avg: 3711     median: 3707.5 (22%)     max: 3792 Points
116%
620M +
min: 3346     avg: 3504     median: 3473 (21%)     max: 4213 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 7709     avg: 8760     median: 8357 (6%)     max: 10398 Points
min: 7765     avg: 7987     median: 7906 (6%)     max: 8349 Points
min: 6981     avg: 7560     median: 7657 (6%)     max: 8323 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 9328     avg: 10025     median: 10161 (6%)     max: 10355 Points
min: 9096     avg: 9533     median: 9430 (6%)     max: 10027 Points
min: 6810     avg: 8715     median: 9046 (6%)     max: 9399 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3420     avg: 3682     median: 3714 (5%)     max: 3952 Points
123%
640M +
min: 4455     avg: 4563     median: 4573 (6%)     max: 4606 Points
114%
620M +
min: 3440     avg: 4112     median: 4249 (5%)     max: 4422 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 463.4     avg: 804     median: 502 (6%)     max: 1526 s
min: 523     avg: 709     median: 569 (7%)     max: 1173 s
min: 524     avg: 814     median: 588 (7%)     max: 1526 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 14.84     avg: 24.9     median: 16.6 (3%)     max: 47.74 s
min: 16.6     avg: 22.1     median: 17.6 (4%)     max: 36.61 s
min: 16     avg: 22.4     median: 18 (4%)     max: 39.25 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 640M +
1763 Points (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 640M +
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 640M +
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 640M +
1.3 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2892     avg: 3098     median: 3100 (7%)     max: 3307 Points
107%
640M +
min: 3094     avg: 3285     median: 3307 (7%)     max: 3442 Points
min: 2739     avg: 3020     median: 3044 (6%)     max: 3200 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 15     avg: 15.7     median: 15.6 (3%)     max: 19 s
126%
640M +
min: 12     avg: 13.1     median: 12.3 (3%)     max: 18 s
120%
620M +
min: 13     avg: 13.1     median: 13 (3%)     max: 13.51 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 34     avg: 36.1     median: 36 (2%)     max: 38 s
116%
640M +
min: 30     avg: 32.8     median: 31 (1%)     max: 44 s
110%
620M +
min: 32     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (1%)     max: 34 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 824     avg: 868     median: 851 (4%)     max: 1026 s
113%
640M +
min: 735     avg: 758     median: 754 (3%)     max: 815 s
109%
620M +
min: 768     avg: 786     median: 784 (3%)     max: 804 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 720QM +
min: 40000     avg: 43995     median: 43260 (21%)     max: 49460 MIPS
91%
1 620M +
min: 35248     avg: 39038     median: 39280 (19%)     max: 42170 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 720QM +
min: 32380     avg: 32845     median: 33000 (25%)     max: 33000 MFLOPS
84%
1 620M +
min: 26510     avg: 28839     median: 27867.5 (21%)     max: 32430 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 6074     avg: 6957     median: 6910.5 (14%)     max: 7776 Points
155%
640M +
min: 10087     avg: 10706     median: 10706 (22%)     max: 11325 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 720QM +
7 Points (100%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 6.9     avg: 7     median: 7 (90%)     max: 7.1 Points
min: 6.8     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (88%)     max: 7 Points
min: 6.5     avg: 6.8     median: 6.9 (88%)     max: 6.9 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5822     avg: 10413     median: 10663 (8%)     max: 11155 Points
min: 8589     avg: 8882     median: 8861 (7%)     max: 9216 Points
min: 7128     avg: 8391     median: 8645 (7%)     max: 8840 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 720QM +
3936 Points (10%)
85%
1 640M +
3356 Points (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-720QM → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-640M → 107% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-620M → 99% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 28. 22:49:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 519 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1220 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 531 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753735760s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 519 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 519 +0.046s ... 0.055s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1220 +0.001s ... 0.056s

#11 got single benchmarks 1220 +0.007s ... 0.063s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 531 +0.001s ... 0.063s

#13 got single benchmarks 531 +0.017s ... 0.08s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.102s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.102s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)