Notebookcheck Logo

65 W AC adapter for the MSI Prestige 16 AI+ can bottleneck charging rate

65 W USB-C AC adapter from MSI versus the 140 W USB-C AC adapter from HP
ⓘ Notebookcheck
65 W USB-C AC adapter from MSI versus the 140 W USB-C AC adapter from HP
The Prestige 16 ships with a small 65 W adapter while the XPS 16 ships with a larger 100 W adapter. Consequently, the smaller adapter has an impact on overall performance and charging rate.

The Dell XPS 16, Asus ExpertBook Ultra, and MSI Prestige 16 AI+ are now all shipping with similar Core Ultra X7 processor options for similar levels of performance. The latter, however, ships with a smaller 65 W USB-C AC adapter while the rest would ship with more capable 100 W USB-C AC adapters instead. How does the smaller MSI adapter impact performance or charging rate?

To test this, we would run benchmarks on the MSI Prestige 16 AI+ first with the included 65 W USB-C AC adapter and then a second time with our 140 W USB-C AC adapter from HP (a 100 W USB-C AC adapter was not on hand for testing). When running Prime95 stress on the 65 W adapter, consumption would peak at 65.1 W as shown by our independent measurement below.

Running Prime95 on the included 65 W USB-C AC adapter
Running Prime95 on the included 65 W USB-C AC adapter

Repeating the Prime95 stress test with the 140 W adapter would result in a much higher consumption peak of 96.1 W as represented by the graph below. The Power Delivery of the USB-C port on the Prestige 16 AI+ is rated for only 100 W and so the 140 W adapter cannot be used to full capacity.

Running Prime95 on a 140 W USB-C AC adapter. Note that the Prestige 16 can take advantage of the higher power capacity
Running Prime95 on a 140 W USB-C AC adapter. Note that the Prestige 16 can take advantage of the higher power capacity

The higher power consumption, however, does not translate to noticeably faster performance. The table below shows only minor benefits of just a few percentage points when running multi-thread benchmarks on our higher capacity adapter.

Benchmark65 W AC adapter140 W AC adapter
CineBench R15 Multi-Thread29373033 (+3%)
CineBench 2024 Multi-Thread9801030 (+5%)

Instead, the main advantage of the more capable AC adapter is its faster charging rates when running demanding loads simultaneously. For example, when attempting to charge the laptop at 56% battery whilst running Cyberpunk 2077 with the included 65 W AC adapter, the state of charge would actually remain flat at 56%. The battery would only begin charging at a decent rate when we swapped out the 65 W adapter for the 140 W adapter. Indeed, simply running Cyberpunk 2077 alone would already draw over 60 W leaving almost no overhead for charging if the AC adapter is too small.

Prestige 16 AI+ owners who frequently game or run demanding software will therefore benefit the most from a 100 W AC adapter due to its more reliable charging rate. Otherwise, the included 65 W AC adapter is sufficient and more travel friendly.

Additional benchmarks and comparisons can be found on our full review of the 2026 Prestige 16 AI+.

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2026 05 > 65 W AC adapter for the MSI Prestige 16 AI+ can bottleneck charging rate
Allen Ngo, 2026-05-13 (Update: 2026-05-10)