Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10910 vs Intel Core i5-10400F

Intel Core i9-10910

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10910

The Intel Core i9-10910 is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.0 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.6 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.0 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches AMD Ryzen 7 4800U and Intel Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming setup.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

The Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W. It can easily consume twice as much when under short-term load though. Last but not the least, the CPU is built with a fairly old (as of early 2023) 14 nm Intel process making for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i9-10910Intel Core i5-10400F
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-S
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 « 3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-109103.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3600 - 5000 MHz2900 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 206 / 12
TDP125 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1200LGA 1200
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630
Architecturex86x86
$488 U.S.$155 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10910
51.4 pt (58%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
42.2 pt (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
501 Points (58%)
438 Points (50%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5196 Points (22%)
3201 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2302 Points (24%)
1332 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
215 Points (66%)
180 Points (55%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25.6 Points (36%)
14.4 Points (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (8%)
2 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8131 Points (66%)
6719 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57842 Points (65%)
36564 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
47901 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8849 Points (48%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
134.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.3 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
243.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.8 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8613 Points (50%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60747 MIPS (38%)
36731 MIPS (23%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5690 MIPS (68%)
5064 MIPS (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81.2 fps (30%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
228.5 fps (54%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.8 fps (36%)
11.2 fps (24%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
208 Seconds (1%)
332.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
0.6 sec (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
19.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
432.5 s (2%)
470.4 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18348 Points (51%)
14539 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
62086 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
61795 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
62883 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11914 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25520 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11771 Points (58%)
7548 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1381 Points (60%)
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (53%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10244 Points (36%)
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (22%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6349 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5587 Points (58%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25403 Points (28%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
737 ms (1%)
849 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
55976 Points (58%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
236 Points (60%)
215 Points (54%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
135.8 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
125.5 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.6 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10910 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 81% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 30. 09:29:18

#0 checking url part for id 12832 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 30 Jan 2023 08:57:14 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.02s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12832 +0.01s ... 0.03s

#7 got single benchmarks 12832 +0.007s ... 0.037s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.01s ... 0.047s

#9 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.006s ... 0.053s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.137s ... 0.191s

#12 return log +0.029s ... 0.22s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)