Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10885H vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900H

Intel Core i9-10885H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10885H

The Intel Core i9-10885H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i9-10855H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP. 

Performance

The performance of the Core i9-10885H should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the i9-10885H is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

AMD Ryzen 9 4900H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 4900H

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900H is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. At the time of announcement in March 2020 it is the fastest model of the 4000H series. The R9 4900H integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to  4.4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips

According to our information, the Ryzen 9 4900H is only slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 4800H. The CPU is clocked 400 MHz (base +14%) to 200 MHz (boost +5%) higher, but the gains greatly depend on the cooling and TDP settings. Compared to Intel chips, the i9-9980HK top model should be comparable. That means the Ryzen 9 4900H should be able to handle all demanding tasks and gaming.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 12 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 45 Watt (default). That means the chip is intended for big and relatively heavy laptops.

ModelIntel Core i9-10885HAMD Ryzen 9 4900H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
CodenameComet Lake-HRenoir-H (Zen 2)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H « 3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H compare2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H compare3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Clock2400 - 5300 MHz3300 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1440FP6
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$556 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10885H
36.2 pt (50%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900H
35.4 pt (49%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8802     avg: 9438     median: 9438 (9%)     max: 10074 Points
min: 11416     avg: 11604     median: 11604 (11%)     max: 11792 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1284     avg: 1290     median: 1289.5 (55%)     max: 1295 Points
min: 1290     avg: 1294     median: 1294 (55%)     max: 1298 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 460     avg: 487.3     median: 489 (54%)     max: 513 Points
min: 482     avg: 493.5     median: 493.5 (55%)     max: 505 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2798     avg: 3400     median: 3639 (9%)     max: 3762 Points
min: 4233     avg: 4409     median: 4409 (11%)     max: 4585 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1264     avg: 1502     median: 1517 (10%)     max: 1726 Points
min: 1886     avg: 1927     median: 1926.5 (12%)     max: 1967 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 197     avg: 206.7     median: 211 (64%)     max: 212 Points
min: 192     avg: 193     median: 193 (58%)     max: 194 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
23 Points (30%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5946 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40253 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
65380 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10173 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
131.2 s (2%)
82.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.9 s (1%)
3.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6420 Points (10%)
4297 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 36740     avg: 40519     median: 41823 (24%)     max: 42993 MIPS
48976 MIPS (28%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5397     avg: 5551     median: 5589 (67%)     max: 5668 MIPS
4727 MIPS (57%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
80.5 fps (28%)
111 fps (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
217.8 fps (50%)
215 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.6     avg: 11.5     median: 11.3 (20%)     max: 12.5 fps
12.9 fps (23%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.9 GB/s (26%)
7.4 GB/s (19%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 283     avg: 311     median: 302 (2%)     max: 348 Seconds
247.3 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.564     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.572 sec
0.6 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12101 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
9.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.3 s (1%)
24.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
433.9 s (2%)
729 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
64532 Points (57%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12279     avg: 14604     median: 14291 (39%)     max: 17242 Points
12199 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
31296 Points (25%)
63266 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
30997 Points (25%)
63416 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
69343 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 11176     avg: 12814     median: 12814 (32%)     max: 14452 Points
15719 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17249     avg: 19483     median: 20594 (37%)     max: 20606 Points
20613 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6510     avg: 7798     median: 8203 (35%)     max: 8682 Points
6523 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1216     avg: 1303     median: 1317 (56%)     max: 1376 Points
min: 1230     avg: 1232     median: 1231.5 (52%)     max: 1233 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6529     avg: 7045     median: 6914 (12%)     max: 7693 Points
min: 7224     avg: 8012     median: 8012 (14%)     max: 8800 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1234     avg: 1281     median: 1280.5 (6%)     max: 1327 Points
1237 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6598     avg: 7172     median: 7172 (23%)     max: 7746 Points
7624 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5672     avg: 5676     median: 5675.5 (57%)     max: 5679 Points
5287 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 26114     avg: 29009     median: 29009 (32%)     max: 31904 Points
28402 Points (31%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 730     avg: 738     median: 734 (1%)     max: 749 ms
767 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
58398 Points (52%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 233     avg: 234.3     median: 234 (49%)     max: 236 Points
227 Points (47%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 78.1     avg: 103.7     median: 116.4 (20%)     max: 116.6 Watt
73.2 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 125.2     avg: 131.2     median: 126 (23%)     max: 142.4 Watt
105.3 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 10.1     avg: 11.5     median: 10.7 (8%)     max: 13.7 Points per Watt
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10885H → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900H → 108% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 10:24:38

#0 checking url part for id 11962 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11929 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:33:54 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11962 +0.017s ... 0.049s

#7 got single benchmarks 11962 +0.025s ... 0.074s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11929 +0.015s ... 0.089s

#9 got single benchmarks 11929 +0.012s ... 0.1s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.1s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.292s ... 0.392s

#12 return log +0.026s ... 0.418s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)