Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-9700 vs Intel Core i5-11400H

Intel Core i7-9700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9700

The Intel Core i7-9700 is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It integrates 8 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 8 threads) clocked at 3 - 4.7 GHz. Compared to the similar named Core i7-9700K, the 9700 has no open multiplicator for easy overclocking, offers lower clock speeds and offers a reduced TDP.

Compared to the old Core i7-8700, the 9700 offers two more real cores but no Hyperthreading. Therefore, the performance gain is not that big - depending on the app. The single core performance was slightly improved thanks to the higher Turbo clocks. As a high end desktop CPU, the i7-9700 is well suited for demanding tasks and gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 65 Watt (instead of the 95W of the faster models) and therefore the CPU wont need a high end desktop cooling system.

Intel Core i5-11400H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11400H

The Intel Core i5-11400H is a high-end hexa-core SoC for gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 generation and was announced in mid 2021. It integrates six Willow Cove processor cores (12 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and at 45 Watt is at 2.7 GHz. The single core boost speed can reach up to 4.5 GHz, all cores can reach up to 4.1 GHz. The CPU geatures 12 MB L3 cache and supports DDR4-3200 memory.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (20 lanes in the H45 series), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6E in the chip.

The SoC features an improved Gen 12 graphics adapter called UHD Graphics with 16 EUs.

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Performance

The average 11400H in our database matches the Ryzen 5 5600U and the Core i7-10750H in multi-thread performance, rendering the Core i5 a decent mid-range option as of mid 2022. It isn't as fast as the mighty Ryzen 9 5900HS, yet it will let you run most games in High or even Ultra settings at 1080p if mated to a fast graphics card.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 45 W, the Gigabyte G5 GD (2021) is among the fastest laptops built around the 11400H that we know of. It can be around 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a default TDP of 35 W to 45 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The i5-11400H is manufactured on Intel's 3rd generation 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for below average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-9700Intel Core i5-11400H
CodenameCoffee Lake-RTiger Lake-H
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Tiger Lake
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 « 3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900KB compare3.3 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900H compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11950H compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11955M compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11850H compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11800H compare2.3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11855M compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11500B compare3.3 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400H « 2.7 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11260H compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock3000 - 4700 MHz2700 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB480 KB
L2 Cache2 MB7.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 86 / 12
TDP65 Watt45 Watt
Technology14++ nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCLGA1151BGA1787
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (350 - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9700
31.3 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11400H
33 pt (55%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
86 Points (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
414 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6674     avg: 8150     median: 8451 (8%)     max: 9406 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1349     avg: 1428     median: 1460.5 (61%)     max: 1472 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
474 Points (52%)
min: 522     avg: 557     median: 561 (61%)     max: 569 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2892 Points (7%)
min: 2550     avg: 3142     median: 3283 (8%)     max: 3740 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1254 Points (8%)
min: 1014     avg: 1297     median: 1277 (8%)     max: 1532 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
199 Points (55%)
min: 202     avg: 214.3     median: 218 (60%)     max: 219 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.4 Points (19%)
min: 13.31     avg: 14.6     median: 14.6 (19%)     max: 15.97 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.3 Points (53%)
min: 2.45     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (59%)     max: 2.55 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7473 Points (45%)
min: 8611     avg: 8712     median: 8712 (53%)     max: 8813 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
37381 Points (27%)
min: 36972     avg: 39096     median: 39095.5 (28%)     max: 41219 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
49666 Points (32%)
54687 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9840 Points (12%)
11530 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
155.8 s (2%)
min: 140.674     avg: 231.8     median: 231.8 (3%)     max: 323 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.8 s (1%)
min: 4.498     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 9.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6945 Points (11%)
min: 5477     avg: 5571     median: 5571 (9%)     max: 5665 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
33539 MIPS (19%)
min: 27615     avg: 33927     median: 33444 (19%)     max: 40268 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5186 MIPS (61%)
min: 4802     avg: 5104     median: 5116 (60%)     max: 5343 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
77.6 fps (2%)
min: 62     avg: 69.9     median: 69.9 (2%)     max: 77.85 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
247.5 fps (6%)
min: 138     avg: 182.3     median: 182.3 (5%)     max: 226.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
10.5 fps (18%)
min: 8.19     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (17%)     max: 11.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (23%)
min: 0.78     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (23%)     max: 0.815 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.6 GB/s (20%)
min: 7.9     avg: 8.2     median: 8.2 (21%)     max: 8.4 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
662 Seconds (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
388.7 Seconds (3%)
min: 340     avg: 399.5     median: 396 (3%)     max: 483 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
min: 0.581     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.644 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12039     avg: 12170     median: 12043 (26%)     max: 12429 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.3 s (2%)
min: 7.5     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.549 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.4 s (1%)
min: 16.3     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (1%)     max: 16.303 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
460.7 s (2%)
min: 338.041     avg: 487.5     median: 487.5 (2%)     max: 637 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 43773     avg: 47410     median: 47410 (36%)     max: 51047 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
13939 Points (34%)
min: 8859     avg: 12046     median: 11488.5 (28%)     max: 15086 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
79476 Points (65%)
min: 35428     avg: 52471     median: 52470.5 (43%)     max: 69513 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
79073 Points (64%)
35070 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79079 Points (64%)
min: 69034     avg: 70364     median: 70347 (56%)     max: 71711 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11688 Points (30%)
min: 9771     avg: 10834     median: 10594 (27%)     max: 12377 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
16387 Points (29%)
min: 9406     avg: 16286     median: 16949 (30%)     max: 19795 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6867 Points (29%)
min: 4618     avg: 6094     median: 5827 (25%)     max: 7707 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2090 Points (51%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
6317 Points (25%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1980 Points (63%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
6124 Points (25%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1312 Points (50%)
min: 1396     avg: 1478     median: 1500 (57%)     max: 1528 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
7060 Points (13%)
min: 4679     avg: 6131     median: 6006 (11%)     max: 7018 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1300 Points (6%)
1461 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7060 Points (22%)
5961 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5777 Points (58%)
6110 Points (61%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
27040 Points (27%)
24947 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
790 ms (1%)
min: 655     avg: 669     median: 661 (1%)     max: 702 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 135.9     avg: 156.2     median: 156.2 (2%)     max: 176.4 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 60869     avg: 63575     median: 63574.5 (47%)     max: 66280 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
204 Points (56%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
232 Points (42%)
min: 243     avg: 250.5     median: 250 (45%)     max: 259 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1285 Points (48%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-9700 +
143.8 Watt (25%)
min: 51.3     avg: 64.7     median: 65.8 (11%)     max: 75.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-9700 +
141.9 Watt (26%)
min: 66.4     avg: 81.5     median: 81.9 (15%)     max: 95.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
20 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 i7-9700 +
8.8 Points per Watt (7%)
min: 15.8     avg: 17.3     median: 16.9 (13%)     max: 19.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9700 → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11400H → 97% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 08. 19:29:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12254 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13147 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759944540s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12254 +0.002s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 12254 +0s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13147 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 13147 +0.015s ... 0.026s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.05s ... 0.076s

#13 return log +0.008s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)