Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8650U vs AMD Ryzen 7 1700

Intel Core i7-8650U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8650U

The Intel Core i7-8650U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i7-7600U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8650U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.9 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 4,2 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behaviour will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads. The performance however is highly depending on the TDP settings and cooling solution of the laptop. Especially, longer loads will show varying results in different laptops.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

► remove from comparison AMD R7 1700

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is a fast desktop processor with 8 cores and SMT (16 threads) that was introduced in early 2017. It is based on the new Zen architecture and it is the slowest model at the time of announcement. With 65 Watt it is also less power hungry than the Ryzen 1700X.

The CPU cores clock from 3 base speed up to 3.75 GHz (XFR). The 2-core Turbo is specified at 3.7 GHz and using all 8 cores, the CPU can reach up to 3.2 GHz. The clock rate and TDP rating is the only difference to the faster Ryzen 7 models.

The performance in applications that can make use of all 8 cores is very competitive to high end Intel CPUs at a very good price point. However, non optimized apps like many games can't make full use of the new architecture.

A detailed look at the new Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X and 1700 can be found in our review.

ModelIntel Core i7-8650UAMD Ryzen 7 1700
SeriesIntel Kaby Lake RefreshAMD Ryzen 7
CodenameKaby Lake RefreshZen
Series: Ryzen 7 Zen
Intel Core i7-8650U « 1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U compare1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U compare1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U compare1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X compare3.6 - 4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 « 3 - 3.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock1900 - 4200 MHz3000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB4 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 16
TDP15 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1356AM4
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$409 U.S.$329 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
Transistors4800 Million

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 451     avg: 589     median: 605 (4%)     max: 675 Points
min: 1408     avg: 1415     median: 1414 (9%)     max: 1424 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 128     avg: 165     median: 169 (51%)     max: 178 Points
min: 144     avg: 146.2     median: 147 (44%)     max: 147.6 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.04     avg: 6.4     median: 6.8 (9%)     max: 7.24 Points
min: 15.56     avg: 15.7     median: 15.7 (20%)     max: 15.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.67     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (48%)     max: 2.04 Points
min: 1.63     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (41%)     max: 1.67 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5307     avg: 6337     median: 6629 (40%)     max: 6782 Points
min: 4286     avg: 4449     median: 4419 (27%)     max: 4643 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16227     avg: 18738     median: 18635 (14%)     max: 21455 Points
min: 28947     avg: 29222     median: 29330 (21%)     max: 29388 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21677 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6864 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 268.3     avg: 301.9     median: 302.8 (4%)     max: 334.6 s
120 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 8.636     avg: 9.6     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 10.28 s
6 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
413.8 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
10.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4140     avg: 4423     median: 4319 (7%)     max: 4915 Points
min: 3364     avg: 3447     median: 3447 (5%)     max: 3530 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 35     avg: 39.1     median: 39.8 (14%)     max: 41.98 fps
min: 67     avg: 74.4     median: 74.4 (26%)     max: 81.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 149     avg: 165.4     median: 169.6 (39%)     max: 173.2 fps
min: 147     avg: 153.9     median: 153.9 (35%)     max: 160.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.393     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.444 GB/s
min: 0.823     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.83 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.662     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.733 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
min: 6     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (19%)     max: 8.4 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 4487     avg: 6716     median: 6936 (15%)     max: 7939 Points
min: 7730     avg: 8335     median: 8335 (18%)     max: 8940 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8     avg: 8.6     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 9 s
min: 11.4     avg: 11.8     median: 11.8 (3%)     max: 12.1 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 19     avg: 19.7     median: 20 (1%)     max: 20.1 s
min: 24.9     avg: 25.7     median: 25.7 (1%)     max: 26.4 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 501     avg: 513     median: 508 (2%)     max: 542 s
min: 594     avg: 636     median: 635.5 (3%)     max: 677 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
19125 Points (17%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5168     avg: 7106     median: 6863 (19%)     max: 8887 Points
min: 10162     avg: 12003     median: 12723 (34%)     max: 13124 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 39040     avg: 42198     median: 41275 (34%)     max: 47797 Points
60924 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 41011     avg: 43029     median: 41405.5 (34%)     max: 48293 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 44090     avg: 52920     median: 56455 (48%)     max: 58675 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4442     avg: 5935     median: 6089 (15%)     max: 7416 Points
12048 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6823     avg: 8895     median: 9167 (16%)     max: 10541 Points
min: 16715     avg: 16759     median: 16732 (30%)     max: 16830 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2685     avg: 3010     median: 2876 (12%)     max: 3569 Points
min: 6411     avg: 6981     median: 7116 (30%)     max: 7415 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 1700 +
3884 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 1700 +
18457 Points (21%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 1700 +
min: 4110     avg: 4145     median: 4144.5 (56%)     max: 4179 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 1700 +
min: 18800     avg: 19292     median: 19292 (47%)     max: 19784 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 1700 +
23920 Points (42%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 1700 +
3343 Points (65%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 1700 +
min: 25002     avg: 25451     median: 25451 (40%)     max: 25900 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 1700 +
min: 3609     avg: 3805     median: 3804.5 (57%)     max: 4000 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 R7 1700 +
18461 Points (48%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 809     avg: 1126     median: 1076.5 (1%)     max: 1912 ms
1054 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 63.8     avg: 74.2     median: 74.4 (1%)     max: 83.1 ms
84.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 11491     avg: 31341     median: 33906 (30%)     max: 42822 Points
32176 Points (29%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
227 Points (47%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 1700 +
141 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 1700 +
133 Watt (24%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8650U → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 1700 → 140% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 20:25:22

#0 checking url part for id 9212 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8516 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9212 +0.003s ... 0.027s

#7 got single benchmarks 9212 +0.05s ... 0.076s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8516 +0.003s ... 0.079s

#9 got single benchmarks 8516 +0.013s ... 0.093s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.093s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.23s ... 0.323s

#12 return log +0.021s ... 0.344s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)