Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-8365U vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Intel Core i5-8365U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8365U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation and was announced in April 2019 as part of two vPro capable CPUs of the WHL-U series. Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i5-8250U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i5-8365U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 4.1 GHz (versus 3.4 GHz of the i5-8250U) for a single core. The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Thermal Velocity Boost is not supported (only in the Core i7-8565U).

Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-8265U, the i5-8365U offers a 200 MHz higher Turbo Boost. As the i5-8365U first appeared in a Thinkpad, the CPU most likely supports vPRO for additional hardware management features.

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i5-8365U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additionalTurbo  clock speed can be made use of. Compared to the Core i5-8265U (see for benchmarks), the 200 MHz higher Turbo Boost should result in some gains in single core benchmarks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen V1605B

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B is an embedded APU for mini PCs and embedded solutions that was announced in February 2017. Compared to the similar consumer Ryzen 5 2500U, the V1605B offers different support and availability options.

It includes four Zen cores clocked at 2 to 3.6 GHz and offers 4 MB L3-Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 8 and offers 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1100 MHz. The TDP is configurable between 12 and 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal). More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

ModelIntel Core i5-8365UAMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameWhiskey Lake-UZen
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
Intel Core i5-8365U « 1.6 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8265U compare1.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B « 2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1600 - 4100 MHz2000 - 3600 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1528AM4
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
Transistors4500 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8365U
28.9 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen V1605B
25.3 pt (35%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3160 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
841 Points (36%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 419     avg: 421.3     median: 421 (47%)     max: 424 Points
334 Points (37%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1373     avg: 1404     median: 1408 (3%)     max: 1430 Points
1235 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 558     avg: 584     median: 579 (4%)     max: 620 Points
654 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 163     avg: 166.5     median: 166 (50%)     max: 171 Points
128 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.7 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6557 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
16518 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
296.7 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.7 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3173 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 16711     avg: 17312     median: 17293 (10%)     max: 17932 MIPS
16708 MIPS (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3958     avg: 4261     median: 4346 (52%)     max: 4478 MIPS
3374 MIPS (40%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
35.9 fps (13%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
153 fps (35%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.3     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 4.7 fps
3.6 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.6 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 791     avg: 824     median: 825 (6%)     max: 855 Seconds
791 Seconds (6%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6330 Points (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
546 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6016     avg: 6522     median: 6395 (17%)     max: 7280 Points
7177 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 48328     avg: 49088     median: 49088 (40%)     max: 49848 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 49912     avg: 50182     median: 50182 (41%)     max: 50452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55371     avg: 56207     median: 56206.5 (47%)     max: 57042 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5405     avg: 5910     median: 6159 (16%)     max: 6166 Points
6640 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 7744     avg: 8377     median: 8376.5 (15%)     max: 9009 Points
9195 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2464 Points (10%)
3033 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
819 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3184 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
846 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3264 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4647     avg: 4823     median: 4822.5 (48%)     max: 4998 Points
3800 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14833     avg: 15472     median: 15472 (17%)     max: 16111 Points
12100 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4558 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13444 Points (33%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1099     avg: 1142     median: 1161 (1%)     max: 1165 ms
1258 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 31051     avg: 32738     median: 32878 (30%)     max: 34285 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
149 Points (31%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
39.9 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
14.5 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8365U → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B → 95% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 03:58:43

#0 checking url part for id 11330 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13197 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11330 +0.02s ... 0.05s

#7 got single benchmarks 11330 +0.019s ... 0.07s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13197 +0.02s ... 0.09s

#9 got single benchmarks 13197 +0.007s ... 0.096s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.273s ... 0.369s

#12 return log +0.059s ... 0.429s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)