Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12600K vs Intel Core i9-11900K

Intel Core i5-12600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12600K

The Intel Core i5-12600K is a mid-range CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 6 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 16 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz. All cores can use 20 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.45 GHz.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

Performance

The average 12600K in our database is way ahead of the Ryzen 9 3900 and the Core i9-10900K, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast CPU that should have no trouble running triple-A games for at least a couple of years.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sitting at 150 W.

The i5-12600K is built with Intel's fourth generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-11900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-11900K

The Intel Core i9-11900K is a high-end desktop CPU based on the Rocket Lake architecture. The CPU offers 8 cores and 16 threads clocked at 3.5 - 5.3 GHz (Turbo Boost 3.0 / TVB). With Turbo Boost 2.0, 5.1 GHz can be reached with a single thread. Using all cores, the CPU can clock up to 4.8 GHz. Adaptive Boost enables even higher multi-core frequencies (5.1 GHz all core Turbo) but uses a lot more power.

The TDP is rated at 125 Watt (PL1, power limit sustained load) but the PL2 is set to around 250 Watt for short term boosts (up to 56 seconds).

The Sunny Cove processor cores (known from the Ice Lake mobile CPUs) offer larger caches and an improved IPC (up to 19%). Furthermore, the chip also includes (partly) integrated WiFi 6E and Thunderbolt 4. The platform supports PCIe 4.0 and Intel DL Boost for AI acceleration.

The faster Rocket Lake-S CPUs also integrate a new Intel UHD Graphics 750 that is based on the current Intel Xe architecture (e.g. mobile Tiger Lake) and offers 32 EUs. In the 11900K, the GPU is clocked from 350 - 1300 MHz.

Performance

The average 11900K in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is an impressive result, as of mid 2022, and good enough for any task imaginable including content creation and professional gaming.

Power consumption

This Core i9 has a 125 W TDP, also known as the long-term power limit. Intel lets PC manufacturers reduce that value somewhat if required, 95 W being the lower limit, which would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. The reality is, an 11900K can be much more power hungry than either of the two numbers imply simply because of its sheer might but also because it is manufactured on an old 14 nm Intel process that makes for lower-than-average, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-12600KIntel Core i9-11900K
CodenameAlder LakeRocket Lake
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Rocket Lake
Series: Rocket Lake Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K « 2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900K « 3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700 compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K compare3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T compare1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4900 MHz3500 - 5300 MHz
L2 Cache9.5 MB4 MB
L3 Cache20 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 168 / 16
TDP125 Watt125 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1700LGA1200
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (350 - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$289 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache640 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12600K
40 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-11900K
38.1 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
98 Points (49%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
698 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17491 Points (16%)
min: 13825     avg: 14669     median: 14747 (14%)     max: 15519 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1907 Points (78%)
min: 1604     avg: 1640     median: 1636 (67%)     max: 1693 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
734 Points (80%)
min: 619     avg: 633     median: 633 (69%)     max: 647 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6692 Points (16%)
min: 5055     avg: 5499     median: 5306 (13%)     max: 5997 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2555 Points (16%)
min: 2238     avg: 2358     median: 2379 (15%)     max: 2436 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
275 Points (76%)
min: 254     avg: 256.5     median: 255 (71%)     max: 262 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
30 Points (39%)
26.8 Points (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (79%)
3.1 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9381 Points (57%)
10545 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
55462 Points (40%)
62024 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89478 Points (57%)
80613 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15180 Points (18%)
14149 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
202.7 s (2%)
77.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6239 Points (10%)
9030 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
64260 MIPS (37%)
min: 54125     avg: 59047     median: 59658.5 (34%)     max: 62746 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5944 MIPS (70%)
min: 6174     avg: 6380     median: 6347 (75%)     max: 6652 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
148 fps (4%)
137 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
333.5 fps (9%)
309.5 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
30.1 fps (53%)
min: 16.6     avg: 18.2     median: 18.2 (32%)     max: 19.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.2 GB/s (38%)
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.8 GB/s (33%)
13 GB/s (34%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
428 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
189.5 Seconds (1%)
min: 190.3     avg: 210.8     median: 211.9 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
min: 0.4733     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.4981 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15722 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
6.3 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.4 s (1%)
13.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
363.2 s (2%)
331.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
85458 Points (66%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
25017 Points (62%)
min: 20149     avg: 20662     median: 20662 (51%)     max: 21175 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
78037 Points (63%)
min: 74965     avg: 79326     median: 79325.5 (64%)     max: 83686 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
79174 Points (64%)
75316 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
77742 Points (62%)
85348 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20161 Points (51%)
min: 18242     avg: 19567     median: 20094 (51%)     max: 20364 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
29671 Points (53%)
min: 26699     avg: 27967     median: 28121 (50%)     max: 28927 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
13869 Points (58%)
min: 11012     avg: 12563     median: 12902.5 (54%)     max: 13433 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2629 Points (61%)
2625 Points (61%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
12969 Points (50%)
13521 Points (52%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1904 Points (64%)
min: 1748     avg: 1796     median: 1787.5 (60%)     max: 1885 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
12797 Points (23%)
min: 9547     avg: 10328     median: 10483 (19%)     max: 11035 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1821 Points (8%)
1863 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12746 Points (40%)
11008 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8223 Points (82%)
7976 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
46557 Points (46%)
42329 Points (41%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
511 ms (1%)
min: 544     avg: 566     median: 569.5 (1%)     max: 581 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 244     avg: 247     median: 247 (64%)     max: 250 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
293 Points (53%)
min: 217     avg: 268.5     median: 283.5 (51%)     max: 290 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1637 Points (61%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
256.5 Watt (44%)
min: 197     avg: 235.6     median: 221.5 (38%)     max: 302.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
205.9 Watt (38%)
min: 243     avg: 274.3     median: 259.2 (47%)     max: 336 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
12.4 Points per Watt (9%)
min: 7.03     avg: 8.4     median: 8.6 (6%)     max: 9.39 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12600K → 100% n=45

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-11900K → 100% n=45

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 25. 00:59:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13886 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13161 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761346762s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:39:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13886 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 13886 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13161 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#10 got single benchmarks 13161 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.007s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.028s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.031s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)