Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10200H vs AMD Ryzen 5 4680U

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

The Intel Core i5-10200H is a fast quad-core processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz  and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10200H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster (and later released) Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz).

Performance

The performance is only minimal better than the Core i5-9300H thanks to the support for faster DDR4-2933 RAM. This means, the CPU is well suited for demanding tasks, although the faster versions offer a significantly higher Turbo Boost clock speed for faster single core execution. 

Power consumption

This 10th gen Comet Lake processor has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to reduce somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit. Doing so will result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, this CPU is too power-hungry to be used as the base of a passively cooled laptop.

Intel Core i5-10200H is built with an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 4680U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 4680U

The AMD Ryzen 5 4680U is a semi-custom APU of the Renoir family designed for Microsoft devices. The 4680U integrates six CPU cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture clocked at 2.2 GHz (base) to 4 GHz (Boost) with SMT support for a total 12 threads. The two advantages a 4680U has over the older Ryzen 5 4600U are its higher base clock speed and a faster iGPU.

Architecture

The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and in part thanks to this fact, AMD advertises a 2x performance per watt improvement over the 12 nm Ryzen 3000 mobile processors. The built-in dual-channel memory controller supports LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB of L3 cache can be found on the chip.

Just like the other mobile Ryzen 4000 CPUs, a 4680U supports PCI-Express 3.0. Please go to our Renoir processor hub page for additional information on the product family.

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to the Ryzen 7 4700U and the Core i5-10500H, the latter being a much more power-hungry chip. This makes the Ryzen a more than decent CPU for most tasks, as of early 2022.

Graphics

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a DX 12 compatible Radeon RX Vega 7 graphics adapter with 7 CUs (448 unified shaders) at up to 1,500 MHz. The Vega iGPU will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9 videos, but the newer AV1 codec will only be decoded via software. In terms of gaming, we are looking at an MX150-level performance. Pretty much all games released in 2020 can be played on low to medium settings in 720p on this graphics adapter.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers - Microsoft, in this case - are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Indeed, we saw the CPU consume roughly 23 watts when subjected to our usual stress testing routine.

The 7 nm TSMC process this Ryzen is built with makes for very decent, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-10200HAMD Ryzen 5 4680U
CodenameComet Lake-HRenoir-U (Zen 2)
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U compare2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U compare1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U compare2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U « 2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2400 - 4100 MHz2200 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB3 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 12
TDP45 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1440FP6
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, HT, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SSTLPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 610 (350 - 1050 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
28.3 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 4680U
28.5 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5372 Points (5%)
7073 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1089 Points (46%)
1163 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
419 Points (46%)
451 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2082 Points (5%)
2478 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
842 Points (5%)
1291 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
171.6 Points (48%)
170 Points (47%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
15.6 Points (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5301 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31826 Points (23%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
248.6 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.2 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3576 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
21148 MIPS (12%)
32745 MIPS (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4497 MIPS (53%)
4077 MIPS (48%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.5 fps (11%)
7.7 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.3 GB/s (22%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
515 Seconds (4%)
458 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
0.7 sec (15%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
581 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
6233 Points (15%)
10051 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51050 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7729 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
10760 Points (19%)
16642 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3613 Points (15%)
5067 Points (21%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1480 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
5122 Points (20%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (42%)     max: 1095 Points
1078 Points (41%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (7%)     max: 4126 Points
5785 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
882 ms (1%)
877 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
47184 Points (35%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
187.3 Points (34%)
198 Points (36%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
99.5 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.9 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
77 Points per Watt (57%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4680U → 123% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 20. 08:42:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13178 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760942540s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Oct 2025 05:20:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13178 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 13178 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.047s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)