Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs Intel Atom Z3745

Intel Atom x5-Z8350

► remove from comparison Intel Z8350

The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in February 2016. It is clocked at 1.44 - 1.92 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved over its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to the Atom x5-Z8500, the Atom x5-Z8350 is clocked slightly lower and therefore about 10 percent slower. However, the x5 still beats many ARM-based SoCs and offers a performance similar to a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801. Compared to the older x5-Z8300, the Z8350 offers 80 MHz higher boost clock and therefore a similar performance. See our X5-Z8300 site for detailed benchmarks.

Using Windows, the chip is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light browsing or Office, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 500 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and can handle at least some older and less demandig Windows games in very low settings. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance sligthly below a Qualcomm Adreno 330 or PowerVR G6430.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3745

► remove from comparison Intel Z3745

The Intel Atom Z3745 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.86 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. Compared to the Z3740, the Z3745 is based on the new C0 stepping and offers a slightly increased GPU clock rate.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3745 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3745 competes with Temash and Kabini APUs like the AMD A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 778 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games like World of Warcraft or Fifa will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

ModelIntel Atom x5-Z8350Intel Atom Z3745
SeriesIntel Atom x5Intel Atom
CodenameCherry TrailBay Trail-T
Series: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 compare1.44 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 compare1.44 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 « 1.44 - 1.92 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 compare1.44 - 1.84 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-E8000 compare1.04 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3795 compare1.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775D compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770 compare1.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736F compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736G compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745 « 1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735F compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3680 compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1440 - 1920 MHz1330 - 1860 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
Technology14 nm22 nm
max. Temp.90 °C
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail, 200 - 500 MHz), Wireless Display, AES-NI, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS-1600 (12,8 GB/s), USB 3.0, 1x PCIe 2.0Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 778 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 500 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 778 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache224 KB
TDP<4 Watt
SocketUTFCBGA1380
$32 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8350 +
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8350 +
0.4 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 817     avg: 901     median: 902.5 (5%)     max: 999 Points
min: 929     avg: 948     median: 941 (6%)     max: 973 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2575     avg: 2939     median: 2978.5 (2%)     max: 3130 Points
min: 2491     avg: 3038     median: 3229 (2%)     max: 3393 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z8350 +
1108 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z8350 +
36.2 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 987     avg: 1267     median: 1313 (4%)     max: 1418 Points
min: 1005     avg: 1183     median: 1261 (3%)     max: 1284 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
12990 Points (11%)
min: 14743     avg: 14957     median: 14945 (12%)     max: 15195 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 14732     avg: 15505     median: 15528 (13%)     max: 16016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 8436     avg: 12570     median: 14078 (12%)     max: 15195 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 929     avg: 1036     median: 1071 (3%)     max: 1109 Points
min: 1186     avg: 1234     median: 1255 (3%)     max: 1261 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1588 Points (3%)
1783 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
1126 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
1151 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 880     avg: 903     median: 903 (9%)     max: 926 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 2296     avg: 2393     median: 2393 (3%)     max: 2490 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 836     avg: 888     median: 890.5 (12%)     max: 934 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 1980     avg: 2227     median: 2264.5 (6%)     max: 2399 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2130     avg: 2247     median: 2289 (4%)     max: 2332 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 709     avg: 755     median: 760 (15%)     max: 796 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 1715     avg: 1772     median: 1772 (14%)     max: 1829 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 1590     avg: 1660     median: 1660 (15%)     max: 1730 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 2321     avg: 2724     median: 2723.5 (5%)     max: 3126 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 1457     avg: 1759     median: 1759 (4%)     max: 2061 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 1811     avg: 2078     median: 2077.5 (5%)     max: 2344 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 5047     avg: 5908     median: 5630 (7%)     max: 7230 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 621     avg: 667     median: 667 (6%)     max: 713 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4722     avg: 6393     median: 6494 (6%)     max: 7265 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 2774     avg: 2964     median: 3011.5 (40%)     max: 3108 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 17491     avg: 18396     median: 18279 (42%)     max: 19418 points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 31690     avg: 33031     median: 32811.5 (76%)     max: 34810 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 33318     avg: 34946     median: 33635 (34%)     max: 37656 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
58565 Points (20%)
34692 Points (12%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 875     avg: 958     median: 982 (30%)     max: 992 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 14914     avg: 16893     median: 17437.5 (57%)     max: 17784 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 Z3745 +
min: 20763     avg: 26176     median: 27592 (4%)     max: 28757 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 Z8350 +
3376 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
4671 Points (23%)
4298 Points (22%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x5-Z8350 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3745 → 101% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 07:22:42

#0 checking url part for id 8088 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5933 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.043s ... 0.044s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8088 +0.004s ... 0.047s

#7 got single benchmarks 8088 +0.047s ... 0.095s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5933 +0.004s ... 0.098s

#9 got single benchmarks 5933 +0.028s ... 0.126s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.126s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.213s ... 0.339s

#12 return log +0.061s ... 0.399s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)