Teclast Tbook 10s (x5-Z8350, FHD) Convertible Review

Name: Teclast Tbook 10s
Brand: Teclast

Dual-OS convertible. After Chuwi's Hi10 Pro has recently passed our test course, we have yet another low-budget tablet with dual-boot functionality from the manufacturer Teclast called Tbook 10s in the test. Find out which of the two has the lead in our report.

Marcus Herbrich, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Liala Stieglitz), Published 03/24/2017 🇩🇪 🇮🇹 ...

Windows Android Convertible / 2-in-1 Chinese Tech

For the original German review, see here.

Teclast's Tbook 10s is an affordable 2-in-1 solution in an ambiguous way. The well-equipped, 10.1-inch low-cost tablet comes with a keyboard dock and active stylus for a street price of about 200 Euros (~$215) via import companies. We could examine both in conjunction with our review sample. Furthermore, the Tbook 10s buyers can choose which operating system they prefer to use. Both Windows and Android are preloaded and can also be swapped quite quickly on the fly.

The technical specs of the 10.1-inch tablet look very convincing on paper considering its price range, and they are very similar to those of the recently tested Chuwi Hi10 Pro. The Tbook 10s comes in an aluminum casing, has a 6000 mAh battery, and an IPS panel with a resolution of 1920x1200 pixels. The tablet is powered by Intel's Atom Z8350 processor that is supported by a lush 4 GB of RAM. Furthermore, Teclast treats the Tbook 10s to a very generous 64-GB flash memory.

Since we sooner see the Tbook 10s, like Chuwi's Hi10 Pro, as an affordable Android tablet rather than a full-fledged Windows 10 tablet due to the processor, we used the following Android OS devices for comparison: Asus' ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A, Haier's Pad 971, and Xiaomi's MiPad 2. We compared the Tbook with the also dual-boot capable "main competitor" Chuwi Hi10 Pro in a bit more detail in the test.

Test device courtesy of Teclast

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast Tbook 10s (Tbook Series)

Processor

Intel Atom x5-Z8350 4 x 1.4 - 1.9 GHz, Cherry Trail

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)

Memory

4 GB

Display

10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive, LCD, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 15.7 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm jack, Card Reader: micro-SD, Sensors: position sensor

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 247 x 166 ( = 0.31 x 9.72 x 6.54 in)

Battery

6000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 6 h

Operating System

Android 5.1 Lollipop

Camera

Secondary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: onscreen, keyboard dock, Keyboard Light: no, USB cable, modular power supply, Windows 10, Tecla Android UI, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

574 g ( = 20.25 oz / 1.27 pounds), Power Supply: 63 g ( = 2.22 oz / 0.14 pounds)

Price

150 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Case

The casing of the entry-level tablet is mainly made of a mix of metal and glass. The volume control and power button are made from plastic, but they have a well-defined pressure point and hardly wobble. The casing's build, stability, and torsional stiffness are very good for this price range - nothing dents even under high pressure. The matte aluminum finish of the Tbook 10s makes fingerprints almost invisible on the rear.

The ports for USB, charger, 3.5-mm jack, HDMI, and micro-SD slot are on the tablet's right. The latter is not protected by a flap so it is easy to access, but grime accumulates quickly in it.

The relatively heavy and thick keyboard dock that is connected via magnets to the contacts on the Tbook 10s' lower edge also protects the touchscreen when closed. The physical keyboard is rather low-quality compared with the tablet. The hinge's gaps are very uneven and the plastic dock also produces cracking noises as soon as it is held a bit tighter. The chiclet keyboard dents quite easily.

Connectivity

The internal storage of the Tbook 10s is generously sized at 64 GB. However, almost 16 GB is left when using Android and roughly 27 GB is available when using Windows after initial use. It is possible to expand the storage by up to 128 GB via a micro-SD card.

The wireless transmission of screen content to an external monitor via Miracast functioned without problems in the test. Monitors can also be connected to the micro-HDMI port, and peripherals such as external keyboards or USB flash drives can be connected via USB OTG. The optional keyboard dock additionally features a full-sized USB port.

Software

Google's Android 5.1 Lollipop runs on the Tbook 10s. We deem an update to the newer Android 6.0 Marshmallow or even 7.0 Nougat as unlikely. At least the manufacturer has not made any statements about updating the system. The manufacturer has only modified the user interface in the settings menu and notification bar slightly. Adapted software for using the tablet, such as the Remix OS 2.0 in Chuwi's Hi10Pro, is not provided in the Tbook 10s.

As mentioned, Windows 10 with its familiar system user interface can be used besides Android. It is not possible for the operating systems to share data. However, both Android and Windows 10 can access protected contents of the other OS via micro-SD.

German can be selected in the language settings in both systems.

Communication

The Tbook 10s can use Bluetooth 4.0 for wireless communication. The integrated Wi-Fi module supports the IEEE 802.11 b/g/n standards and transmits only in the 2.4-GHz frequency range. A model with an LTE module is not available for Teclast's convertible. Thus, it is only possible to access the Internet via WiFi. Both the range and stability of the Wi-Fi signal are on a satisfactory level - the attenuation in the immediate vicinity of the router (Telekom Speedport, W921V) is -34 dBm.

The Wi-Fi transmission speed between the tablet and our Linksys EA 8500 reference router is on par with Chuwi's device. Although the data rate of almost 40 MBit/s was slow, it was relatively stable and did not fluctuate significantly during the test.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash	246 MBit/s +528%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	41.6 MBit/s +6%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	39.2 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash	254 MBit/s +563%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	40.6 MBit/s +6%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	38.3 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	90.2 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	91.2 MBit/s

Cameras

Teclast only installs a camera with a resolution of 2 MP on the front of its entry-level tablet. The manufacturer omits a rear-facing camera, which is a very comprehensible austerity measure in view of the camera quality of other devices from this price range, such as Haier's Pad 971 or Chuwi's Hi10 Pro.

The photo quality is quite acceptable for a snapshot although the camera module will likely be primarily used with videoconferencing applications, e.g. Skype. The 2 MP front camera's (video) resolution of 720p is sufficient for this.

Accessories and Warranty

In addition to the compulsory accessories, such as a modular power supply which needs an additional euro-adapter, a charger, USB cable, screen protector, warranty conditions, and a quick-start guide, optional accessories are available for the Tbook 10s. An active stylus costs approximately 15 Euros (~$16) and the keyboard dock costs around 40 Euros (~$43).

A 12-month warranty period is included. More information about importing smartphones and tablets can be found here.

Please see our Guarantees, Return Policies and Warranties FAQ for country-specific information.

Input Devices and Handling

The Tbook 10s' 10-finger multi-touchscreen mostly does a good job - sometimes commands were not implemented during the test. However, inputs are processed quickly and accurately into the screen's edges. Onscreen buttons are used to navigate through the system in Android. Touching the capacitive Windows button brings the user back to the home screen. The Chinese manufacturer installs Google's stock keyboard layout for inputting text.

The optional keyboard dock with a QWERTY layout, which also has a small touchpad of 5 x 8 centimeters, could be useful for inputting lengthy texts. However, the 17-millimeter keys hardly provide a pressure point or a stop. The multi-touchpad has a relatively matte finish that needs a bit of getting used to and which is not really glide-friendly. The integrated keys function well. Unfortunately, this cannot be said about the touchpad's accuracy.

In our opinion, the optional active stylus is not a useful alternative for working with the touchscreen - if not absolutely useless. It is very inaccurate and inputs are often not identified. Furthermore, the stylus cannot be stored in the device.

Display

The IPS panel in the Tbook 10s has a diagonal of 25.7 centimeters (10.1-inches) and a WUXGA resolution (1920x1200 pixels). This equals a pixel density of approximately 224 PPI, and content thus looks relatively sharp. The resolution is more than sufficient for everyday use even if it does not provide a WQHD resolution (2560x1440 pixels) as found in higher-priced tablets.

The screen's maximum brightness of 308 cd/m² is not very high and its illumination of 82% is not very homogeneous. In conjunction with the black level (0.29 cd/m²), the device achieves a good contrast ratio of 962:1. We measured a slightly lower rate of 283 cd/m² in the screen brightness test with equally distributed bright and dark areas (APL50). The black level increased marginally to 0.3 cd/m², which also slightly reduced the contrast ratio to 940:1.


252 cd/m²	279 cd/m²	308 cd/m²
262 cd/m²	279 cd/m²	305 cd/m²
252 cd/m²	278 cd/m²	302 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 308 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 279.7 cd/m² Minimum: 35.53 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 279 cd/m²
Contrast: 962:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.27

	Teclast Tbook 10s IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Chuwi Hi10 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Xiaomi MiPad 2 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9"	Haier Pad 971 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7"	Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A IPS, 1280x800, 10.1"	Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7"
Screen		5%	21%	15%	9%	15%
Brightness middle	279	379 36%	425 52%	294 5%	370 33%	489 75%
Brightness	280	356 27%	402 44%	294 5%	351 25%	443 58%
Brightness Distribution	82	87 6%	91 11%	90 10%	89 9%	86 5%
Black Level *	0.29	0.42 -45%	0.4 -38%	0.37 -28%	0.4 -38%	0.43 -48%
Contrast	962	902 -6%	1063 10%	795 -17%	925 -4%	1137 18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.7	4.8 28%	4.98 26%	3.2 52%	4.6 31%	5.5 18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.8	11.2 -4%	6.61 39%	6.5 40%	9.5 12%	11.6 -7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.8	6.7 1%	5.2 24%	3 56%	6.5 4%	6.7 1%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.23 ^99%	2.65 ^83%	2.3 ^96%	2.17 ^101%	2.06 ^107%
CCT	8466 ^77%	6988 ^93%	7249 ^90%	6882 ^94%	6354 ^102%	7457 ^87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17204 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The analysis with our photospectrometer and the CalMAN software reveals - for this price range - an average shift in colors (6.7) and grayscale levels (6.8). The measured color temperature of 8644 Kelvin is far above the ideal value of 6500 Kelvin, which causes a visible bluish tint in the grayscale levels.

CalMAN Colorspace (target color space: sRGB)

CalMAN ColorChecker (target color space: sRGB)

CalMAN Saturation Sweeps (target color space: sRGB)

CalMAN Grayscale (target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

Due to the low brightness, the Tbook 10s is only conditionally legible outdoors. Direct sunlight in conjunction with the glossy screen and visible fingerprints make it difficult to read displayed content. The viewing-angle stability is good as is typical for IPS.

Performance

The heart-piece of Teclast's Tbook 10s is Intel's Atom x5-Z8350, a quad-core SoC that was introduced in February 2016. The four cores of the x5-Z8350 clock at 1.44 to 1.92 GHz (burst) and belong to the Cherry Trail platform. Compared with the somewhat older x5-Z8300 in Chuwi's Hi10 Pro, the maximum clock rate is 80 MHz higher.

Both the performance and browser speed are on a good level for this price range. The system runs smoothly without major delays in everyday use. Only the time needed for unlocking the device could be shorter. The Tbook 10s usually needs one or two seconds. The same is true for opening and closing applications. The slow access rates of the 64-GB flash memory seem to have a negative effect here. The measured read and write speeds of the eMMC storage are not particularly high. The access speeds of the micro-SD card reader in the Tbook 10s could not be recorded. The AndroBench app did not identify our Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 reference card.

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1980 Points
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1971 Points 0%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	879 Points
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	867 Points -1%

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.7 MB/s
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	MB/s
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	MB/s
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	37 MB/s
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	MB/s
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	MB/s
Random Write 4KB
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	13.96 MB/s +311%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7.36 MB/s +116%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.79 MB/s +100%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	5.37 MB/s +58%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.4 MB/s
Random Read 4KB
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	25.79 MB/s +125%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	24.42 MB/s +113%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	18.7 MB/s +63%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	15.34 MB/s +34%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11.44 MB/s
Sequential Write 256KB
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	121.2 MB/s +82%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	66.5 MB/s
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	56.4 MB/s -15%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	39.97 MB/s -40%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	14.57 MB/s -78%
Sequential Read 256KB
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	163.5 MB/s +43%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	147.9 MB/s +29%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	136.1 MB/s +19%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	114.7 MB/s
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	56.9 MB/s -50%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	73083 Points +25%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	58565 Points
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	57914 Points -1%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47100 Points -20%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	36602 Points -38%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	990 Points
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	659 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3170 Points
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1972 Points

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	25460 Points +45%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	17556 Points 0%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	17549 Points
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	10121 Points -42%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6165 Points -65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	27537 Points +48%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	18589 Points 0%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	18563 Points
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	9208 Points -50%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5490 Points -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	20142 Points +33%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	15496 Points +2%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	15195 Points
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14564 Points -4%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10816 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1415 Points
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1398 Points -1%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1353 Points -4%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	610 Points -57%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	245 Points -83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1537 Points 0%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1530 Points
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1300 Points -15%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	540 Points -65%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	203 Points -87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1580 Points +41%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1119 Points
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1111 Points -1%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1061 Points -5%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	916 Points -18%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	23 fps 0%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	23 fps
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps -30%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps -43%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps -48%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	32 fps +19%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	27 fps 0%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	27 fps
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps -41%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps -63%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps 0%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7 fps -36%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	6.3 fps -43%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps -52%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps 0%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	8.4 fps -30%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	7.1 fps -41%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.5 fps -71%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.5 fps
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.3 fps -14%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	6.3 fps -26%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5 fps -41%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps -61%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps +38%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.4 fps
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.2 fps -2%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4.9 fps -48%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2.3 fps -76%

GFXBench
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	8.4 fps +33%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.4 fps +2%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.3 fps
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.9 fps
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	5.7 fps -3%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.6 fps -5%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	5279 Points +13%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4885 Points +5%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4671 Points
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4246 Points -9%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3888 Points -17%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1419 Points +78%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	874 Points +10%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	827 Points +4%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	798 Points
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	749 Points -6%
System
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	2088 Points +55%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1921 Points +43%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1346 Points
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1333 Points -1%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1277 Points -5%
Memory
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1379 Points +339%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	910 Points +190%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	444 Points +41%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	342 Points +9%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	314 Points
Graphics
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1609 Points +35%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1277 Points +7%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1191 Points
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	685 Points -42%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	339 Points -72%
Web
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1011 Points +26%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	952 Points +18%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	805 Points
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	773 Points -4%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	762 Points -5%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	12840 ms * -154%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	6884 ms * -36%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5089 ms * -1%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5047 ms *
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4420 ms * +12%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	43.04 Points +22%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	35.72 Points +1%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	35.36 Points
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	33.13 Points -6%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	21.2 Points -40%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi MiPad 2 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 16 GB eMMC Flash	7994 Points +23%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6494 Points
Chuwi Hi10 Pro HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6365 Points -2%
Haier Pad 971 Mali-T760 MP4, RK3288, 16 GB eMMC Flash	5967 Points -8%
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3320 Points -49%

* ... smaller is better

Teclast's tablet makes a good impression in the synthetic benchmarks although the difference to Chuwi's Hi10 Pro is hardly measurable despite the stronger SoC in the former. The Tbook 10s does a slightly better job compared with the x5-Z8300 rivals in the Windows-based benchmarks.

Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit (sort by value)
Teclast Tbook 10s	8.43 fps
Chuwi Hi10 Pro	8.8 fps +4%
Chuwi Hi12	9.82 fps +16%
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q	11.16 fps +32%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104	10.71 fps +27%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7	60.1 fps +613%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Teclast Tbook 10s	101 Points
Chuwi Hi10 Pro	85 Points -16%
Chuwi Hi12	99 Points -2%
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q	100 Points -1%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104	94 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7	342 Points +239%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Teclast Tbook 10s	1088 Points
Chuwi Hi12	1039 Points -5%
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q	1520 Points +40%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104	1294 Points +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7	3394 Points +212%
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Teclast Tbook 10s	914 Points
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104	1410 Points +54%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7	4431 Points +385%
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Teclast Tbook 10s	1329 Points
Chuwi Hi12	1008 Points -24%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104	1044 Points -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7	4052 Points +205%

Legend

Teclast Tbook 10s Intel Atom x5-Z8350, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 64 GB eMMC Flash

Chuwi Hi10 Pro Intel Atom x5-Z8300, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 64 GB eMMC Flash

Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Hynix HCG8E 64 GB

Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q Intel Atom x5-Z8350, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 64 GB eMMC Flash

Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Intel Core i7-6650U, Intel Iris Graphics 540, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe

Games

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) graphics unit clocks at up to 500 MHz and supports DirectX 12. Up-to-date Android games from the Play Store, such as Asphalt Xtreme or Dead Trigger 2, run smoothly. Games with low hardware requirements usually cannot be played without stutters in Windows even in the minimum resolution.

Emissions

Temperature

The temperature development in load scenarios is within a normal range for a low-end tablet. The Tbook 10s heats up palpably with a maximum temperature of 35.5 °C. However, it never gets unpleasantly hot since the temperatures on the rear are quite low.

Max. Load

Idle


35.5 °C 96 F	28.8 °C 84 F	31.9 °C 89 F
34.2 °C 94 F	29.1 °C 84 F	33.1 °C 92 F
30.8 °C 87 F	28.5 °C 83 F	31.9 °C 89 F

Maximum: 35.5 °C = 96 F
Average: 31.5 °C = 89 F


31.4 °C 89 F	30.8 °C 87 F	29.1 °C 84 F
31.7 °C 89 F	31 °C 88 F	29.5 °C 85 F
29 °C 84 F	29.1 °C 84 F	28.8 °C 84 F

Maximum: 31.7 °C = 89 F
Average: 30 °C = 86 F

Power Supply (max.) 40.5 °C = 105 F | Room Temperature 21.3 °C = 70 F | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-3.8 °C / -6.8 F).

Speakers

The stereo speakers in our review sample achieve a maximum volume of 74 dB(A), which is much quieter than from other tablets. The Tbook 10s offers a similar sound as Chuwi's Hi10 Pro. The sound makes a distorted impression at maximum volume, and it is treble-heavy as expected. The Pink Noise diagram illustrates that lower frequencies are hardly audible. The audible range is not very linear in total.

The 3.5-mm jack can be used for a better yet still average-quality playback.

Teclast Tbook 10s audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (37.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Chuwi Hi10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi MiPad 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Frequency diagram in comparison (checkboxes above can be turned on/off!)

Energy Management

Power Consumption

The Tbook 10s' energy management is slightly more efficient than those of the Intel CPU rivals. The power consumption is nevertheless relatively high, particularly during load, and it climbs to almost 11 watts.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.13 / 0.32 Watt
Idle	1.46 / 5 / 5.08 Watt
Load	9.57 / 10.77 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Teclast Tbook 10s 6000 mAh	Chuwi Hi10 Pro 6500 mAh	Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh	Haier Pad 971 7800 mAh	Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A 4680 mAh
Power Consumption		-7%	-21%	45%	39%
Idle Minimum *	1.46	1.4 4%	3.33 -128%	1.38 5%	1.22 16%
Idle Average *	5	4.82 4%	5.01 -0%	1.46 71%	3.15 37%
Idle Maximum *	5.08	5.43 -7%	5.19 -2%	1.6 69%	3.39 33%
Load Average *	9.57	11.61 -21%	8.32 13%	5.06 47%	3.95 59%
Load Maximum *	10.77	12.48 -16%	9.33 13%	6.95 35%	5.64 48%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Teclast's tablet achieved by far the shortest battery life in the comparison field in our realistic Wi-Fi test where the screen brightness is set to 150 cd/m² with only 3 hours and 48 minutes. The runtime only decreased slightly to 3 hours and 36 minutes when the keyboard dock was attached. Chuwi's H10 Pro also only lasted almost 3 hours longer with Windows in the Wi-Fi test. The Tbook 10s reached a runtime of 4 hours and 10 minutes here.

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		3h 48min

	Teclast Tbook 10s 6000 mAh	Chuwi Hi10 Pro 6500 mAh	Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh	Haier Pad 971 7800 mAh	Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A 4680 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	228	364 60%	421 85%	423 86%	435 91%

Pros

+ 4 GB of RAM

+ accessories (keyboard dock, stylus)

+ OS option: Windows + Android

+ sharp IPS panel

+ low temperatures

Cons

- short battery life

- accessories add little value

- slow eMMC storage

- slow Wi-Fi module

- Android 5.1

- performance (Windows)

Verdict

In review: Teclast Tbook 10s. Review sample courtesy of Teclast

Like Chuwi's Hi10 Pro, Teclast's Tbook 10s convinces with a stylish design and high-quality aluminum casing. The dual-boot option of either Android or Windows operating systems adds to that. However, the manufacturer only installs the now outdated Android 5.1. Concessions have to be made in speaker and camera quality in both devices. Basically, the two tablets hardly differ in terms of looks and feel.

We did not like the quality of the optional accessories offered for Teclast's Tbook 10s. We deem other devices to be configured better in view of the somewhat low-brightness screen, the user interface that has not been optimized for Android, and short battery life. However, buyers looking for an affordable, well-built device with a high-performance Intel SoC and do not need a long-lasting battery can opt for Teclast's Tbook 10s.

Teclast's Tbook 10s is a good low-end tablet in the lower price range, but it does not offer a real unique selling point compared with the competition.

Teclast Tbook 10s - 2017-03-23 03/23/2017 v6 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

72%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

33 / 80 → 41%

Weight

82 / 35-78 → 100%

Battery

74%

Display

80%

Games Performance

42 / 68 → 61%

Application Performance

36 / 87 → 41%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

51 / 91 → 56%

Camera

32 / 85 → 38%

Average

67%

80%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Read all 1 comments / answer

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Marcus Herbrich - Senior Tech Writer - 453 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2016

I have always been very passionately interested in mobile technologies, especially smartphones. Being a tech enthusiast means the half-life of my devices isn’t exactly long, and being the latest hardware is not enough to suffice as the manufacturer and operating system play a minor role – the most important aspect for me is that the device is state-of-the-art. After posting for Mobi Test I joined Notebookcheck in 2016, where I have been pursuing my enthusiasm for technology by reviewing the latest smartphone, tablet, and accessory trends.

contact me via: @Marcus_Herbrich

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Teclast Tbook 10s (x5-Z8350, FHD) Convertible Review

Marcus Herbrich, 2017-03-24 (Update: 2019-04-13)

Teclast Tbook 10s (x5-Z8350, FHD) Convertible Review

Case

Size Comparison

Connectivity

Software

Communication

Cameras

Accessories and Warranty

Input Devices and Handling

Display

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Performance

Games

Emissions

Temperature

Speakers

Teclast Tbook 10s audio analysis

Chuwi Hi10 Pro audio analysis

Xiaomi MiPad 2 audio analysis

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Battery Runtime

Pros

Cons

Verdict

Price comparison