Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8500

Intel Atom x5-Z8350

► remove from comparison Intel Z8350

The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in February 2016. It is clocked at 1.44 - 1.92 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved over its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to the Atom x5-Z8500, the Atom x5-Z8350 is clocked slightly lower and therefore about 10 percent slower. However, the x5 still beats many ARM-based SoCs and offers a performance similar to a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801. Compared to the older x5-Z8300, the Z8350 offers 80 MHz higher boost clock and therefore a similar performance. See our X5-Z8300 site for detailed benchmarks.

Using Windows, the chip is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light browsing or Office, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 500 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and can handle at least some older and less demandig Windows games in very low settings. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance sligthly below a Qualcomm Adreno 330 or PowerVR G6430.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 415 MSM8929

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 (8929) is an ARM-based mid-range SoC for tablets and smartphones (mostly Android based). It was announced in February 2015 and integrates eight 64-Bit Cortex-A53 CPU cores (octa-core) that clock with up to 1.4 GHz. Furthermore, there is a Adreno 405 graphics card, a LPDDR3 memory controller (max. 667 MHz, 5.3 GB/s) and wireless radios for WiFi and 4G/LTE included in the chip.

The Cortex-A53 is the successor of the entry level Cortex-A7 CPU cores. The A53 is now capable of 64 Bit (ARMv8-ISA) and adressing more than 4 GB RAM. According to ARM the performance per MHz is a lot better and even surpasses a Cortex-A9 core.

The integrated Adreno 405 is clocked with about 500 MHz and supports DirectX 11.1 incl. hardware Tesselation, OpenGL ES 3.1 and OpenCL 1.2.

The integrated wireless radios support WiFi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.1, GPS, 2G, 3G and 4G (LTE Cat.4) standards. Futhermore, the SoC is able to decode 1080p videos in H.265 (encode only in H.264) and cameras with up to 13 MP.

The power consumption of the chip is ranging in the mid range, and therefore it is also suited for smaller smartphones. 

Intel Atom x5-Z8500

► remove from comparison Intel Z8500

The Intel Atom x5-Z8500 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in March 2015. It is clocked at 1.44 - 2.24 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved over its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations.

Performance

Compared to the Atom x7-Z8700, the Atom x5-Z8500 is clocked slightly lower and therefore 5 - 10 percent slower. However, the x5 still beats most ARM-based SoCs and offers a performance similar to a Qualcomm Snapdragon 810

Using Windows, the chip is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet or Office, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is about twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and will handle older and less demandig Windows games (e.g. Counter-Strike: GO) in very low settings at decent frame rates. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance similar to the Qualcomm Adreno 330 or PowerVR G6430.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

ModelIntel Atom x5-Z8350Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929Intel Atom x5-Z8500
SeriesIntel Atom x5Qualcomm SnapdragonIntel Atom x5
CodenameCherry TrailCortex-A53Cherry Trail
Series: Atom x5 Cherry Trail
Intel Atom x5-Z85501.44 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z85001.44 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 « 1.44 - 1.92 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z83001.44 - 1.84 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-E80001.04 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6302.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6262.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6252 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4392 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4501.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4292 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM89521.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v21.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM89391.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM89361.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4351.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 « 1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM89161.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ80161.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Intel Atom x5-Z85501.44 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 « 1.44 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z83501.44 - 1.92 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z83001.44 - 1.84 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-E80001.04 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock1440 - 1920 MHz1400 MHz1440 - 2240 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 84 / 4
Technology14 nm28 nm14 nm
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail, 200 - 500 MHz), Wireless Display, AES-NI, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS-1600 (12,8 GB/s), USB 3.0, 1x PCIe 2.0Adreno 405 GPU, WLAN 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/EDGE, WCDMA, UMTS/HSPA, LTE Cat. 4 (max. 150 Mbps), GPS (Qualcomm IZat Gen8C Lite), LPDDR3-1333 Memory ControllerIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail, 200 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 3x USB 3.0, 2x PCIe 2.0
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 500 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 405Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86ARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

110%
1 Z8500 +
min: 73     avg: 103.3     median: 106.5 (1%)     max: 127 Points
127%
1 Z8500 +
min: 35     avg: 35.8     median: 35.5 (11%)     max: 37 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8350 +
1.2 Points (2%)
111%
1 Z8500 +
min: 1.18     avg: 1.4     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.63 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8350 +
0.4 Points (9%)
119%
1 Z8500 +
min: 0.43     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (11%)     max: 0.44 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 817     avg: 901     median: 902.5 (5%)     max: 999 Points
129%
1 Z8500 +
min: 1164     avg: 1166     median: 1166 (7%)     max: 1168 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 2575     avg: 2939     median: 2978.5 (2%)     max: 3130 Points
120%
1 Z8500 +
min: 2947     avg: 3539     median: 3563 (3%)     max: 4107 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 Z8500 +
5560 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 Z8500 +
1656 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z8350 +
1108 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z8350 +
36.2 s (7%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 Z8500 +
2776 s (11%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 Z8500 +
86.7 s (46%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 Z8500 +
min: 768     avg: 842     median: 872 (1%)     max: 885 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 Z8500 +
min: 6.403     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (3%)     max: 8.03 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 Z8500 +
min: 33.1     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (8%)     max: 40.03 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 Z8500 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 Z8500 +
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 Z8500 +
0.6 GB/s (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 Z8500 +
min: 1693     avg: 1947     median: 1991 (4%)     max: 2158 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 Z8500 +
min: 38.68     avg: 38.8     median: 38.8 (8%)     max: 39 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z8500 +
min: 85.2     avg: 85.6     median: 85.6 (4%)     max: 86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 Z8500 +
min: 1840     avg: 1857     median: 1856.5 (8%)     max: 1873 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 987     avg: 1267     median: 1313 (4%)     max: 1418 Points
103%
1 Z8500 +
min: 869     avg: 1258     median: 1353 (4%)     max: 1456 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
12990 Points (11%)
80%
1 Z8500 +
min: 8135     avg: 11061     median: 10445 (8%)     max: 14602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 8436     avg: 12570     median: 14078 (12%)     max: 15195 Points
131%
1 Z8500 +
min: 16673     avg: 18408     median: 18407.5 (16%)     max: 20142 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 929     avg: 1036     median: 1071 (3%)     max: 1109 Points
106%
1 Z8500 +
min: 909     avg: 1087     median: 1136 (3%)     max: 1217 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
1588 Points (3%)
109%
1 Z8500 +
1727 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
1126 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
1151 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 880     avg: 903     median: 903 (9%)     max: 926 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 2296     avg: 2393     median: 2393 (3%)     max: 2490 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 836     avg: 888     median: 890.5 (12%)     max: 934 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 1980     avg: 2227     median: 2264.5 (6%)     max: 2399 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 2130     avg: 2247     median: 2289 (4%)     max: 2332 Points
107%
1 Z8500 +
min: 1848     avg: 2455     median: 2454.5 (4%)     max: 3061 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 709     avg: 755     median: 760 (15%)     max: 796 Points
113%
1 Z8500 +
min: 817     avg: 859     median: 858.5 (17%)     max: 900 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8500 +
min: 1975     avg: 2778     median: 3170 (5%)     max: 3190 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8500 +
min: 856     avg: 949     median: 990 (15%)     max: 1001 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 5047     avg: 5908     median: 5630 (7%)     max: 7230 ms
101%
1 Z8500 +
min: 4420     avg: 4727     median: 4706 (6%)     max: 5142 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 Z8500 +
min: 374.1     avg: 387     median: 387 (4%)     max: 399.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 4722     avg: 6393     median: 6494 (6%)     max: 7265 Points
124%
1 Z8500 +
min: 7843     avg: 8027     median: 8033 (7%)     max: 8197 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 Z8350 +
58565 Points (20%)
122%
1 Z8500 +
min: 70385     avg: 71734     median: 71734 (24%)     max: 73083 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 Z8350 +
3376 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 Z8350 +
4671 Points (23%)
112%
1 Z8500 +
min: 5152     avg: 5216     median: 5215.5 (26%)     max: 5279 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x5-Z8350 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x5-Z8500 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 17. 19:11:08

#0 checking url part for id 8088 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6679 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6671 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.039s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8088 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#8 got single benchmarks 8088 +0.039s ... 0.081s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6679 +0.003s ... 0.084s

#10 got single benchmarks 6679 +0.008s ... 0.092s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 6671 +0.003s ... 0.095s

#12 got single benchmarks 6671 +0.011s ... 0.107s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.226s ... 0.332s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.332s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)