Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 940 vs ARM Mali-G51 MP4

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

ARM Mali-G51 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G51 MP4

The ARM Mali-G51 MP4 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2018 in the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and uses 4 clusters (hence the MP4name). 

The G51 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for cheap mainstream phones. ARM suggests typical clock speeds of 650 MHz with up to 6 cores (MP6).

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL9_3 (versus 11 in the G7x line) and Renderscript.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Mali-G Series
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 compare 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Shared Memoryyesno
technology4 nm12 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 19.07.2018
ArchitectureBifrost
Pipelines4 - unified
Core Speed650 MHz
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G51 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 7108 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 710A8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1821     avg: 1919     median: 1919 (4%)     max: 2017 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12652     avg: 13765     median: 13472.5 (7%)     max: 15464 Points
min: 552     avg: 565     median: 564 (0%)     max: 579 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3933     avg: 4172     median: 4188.5 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
min: 152     avg: 155     median: 155 (0%)     max: 158 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 6649     avg: 8042     median: 8361 (4%)     max: 8797 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
937 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2177     avg: 19359     median: 21501.5 (2%)     max: 23224 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
min: 844     avg: 1417     median: 1485 (6%)     max: 1573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
min: 740     avg: 1273     median: 1316.5 (3%)     max: 1452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
min: 563     avg: 999     median: 981 (4%)     max: 1351 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
min: 470     avg: 863     median: 840 (2%)     max: 1194 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 673     avg: 1261     median: 1440.5 (13%)     max: 1525 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 568     avg: 1124     median: 1276 (8%)     max: 1493 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 550     avg: 924     median: 952.5 (5%)     max: 1099 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 457     avg: 788     median: 805 (3%)     max: 955 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32.5     median: 33 (12%)     max: 34 fps
1.2 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 69     avg: 79.3     median: 79.5 (14%)     max: 89 fps
min: 2.6     avg: 2.9     median: 2.6 (0%)     max: 4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 153     avg: 159.8     median: 155 (11%)     max: 176 fps
min: 4.3     avg: 6.6     median: 7 (1%)     max: 7.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 130     avg: 134.5     median: 134.5 (13%)     max: 139 fps
min: 6.4     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 9.1 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 214     avg: 231     median: 229.5 (5%)     max: 251 fps
min: 12     avg: 13.8     median: 14 (0%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 269     avg: 296.8     median: 299.5 (12%)     max: 319 fps
min: 17     avg: 20.5     median: 21 (1%)     max: 28 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 378     avg: 388     median: 385.5 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G51 MP4
min: 33     avg: 38.1     median: 39 (0%)     max: 41 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
32853 Points (3%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 652246     median: 649947 (45%)     max: 695509 Points
34011 Points (2%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
16 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 13590     avg: 16104     median: 16919 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
487 Points (0%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16689     median: 16082.5 (4%)     max: 18578 Points
0 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 7197     avg: 7220     median: 7220 (2%)     max: 7243 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1883     avg: 1994     median: 1994 (3%)     max: 2105 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.2     avg: 11.7     median: 11.8 (5%)     max: 13.2 Watt
min: 6.33     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (3%)     max: 7.13 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G51 MP4 → 5% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Mali-G51 MP4:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
56.2 58 59 60 ~ 58 fps
50%
Mali-G51 MP4:
29  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
47 50.8 58 59 ~ 54 fps
28%
Mali-G51 MP4:
15  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G51 MP4:
57 59 ~ 58 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
59.1 81 90 90 ~ 80 fps
36%
Mali-G51 MP4:
25 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
med.
Mali-G51 MP4:
25 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
57 58.8 60 60 ~ 59 fps
47%
Mali-G51 MP4:
23 27 30 30 30 30 ~ 28 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
39.2 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-G51 MP4:
30 30 31 31 32 ~ 31 fps
ultra
Mali-G51 MP4:
30 30 31 31 31 ~ 31 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps
53%
Mali-G51 MP4:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G51 MP4:
30 30 30 30 30 30 31 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G51 MP4:
29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Mali-G51 MP4:
59  fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G51 MP4 → 43%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 53%

Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G51 MP4
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
Genshin Impact58542915
Armajet58
PUBG Mobile805940292928
Arena of Valor3131
Dead Trigger 211460
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Real Racing 359
Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G51 MP4
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		2
2
1
1


1
3
1
1
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 14. 15:11:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8902 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765721468s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:23:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.013s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.016s ... 0.03s

#9 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.007s ... 0.037s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8902 +0s ... 0.037s

#11 got single benchmarks 8902 +0.015s ... 0.052s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.053s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.017s ... 0.07s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.072s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.072s

#17 Got 70 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.082s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.082s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.082s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.085s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.085s

#22 return log +0.001s ... 0.086s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)