Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 640 vs Qualcomm Adreno 612

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 640

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 640

The Qualcomm Adreno 640 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2019 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 640 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 630, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 845 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 640 having 50% more FP16 and FP32 compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 630, while its 7 nm FinFET manufacturing process makes it 20% more efficient too.

The Adreno 640 will also support the Vulkan 1.1 API, something which is possible for other Adreno 600 series GPUs too.

Qualcomm Adreno 612

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 640Qualcomm Adreno 612
Adreno 600 Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2Adreno 600
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
technology4 nm10 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement18.01.2022 12.02.2018 15.12.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 640GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8608 x ? MHz, 5 W250 MHz675 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus8 x ? MHz, 5 W250 MHz675 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8558 x 2840 MHz, 5 W? MHz585 MHz
min. - max.? - 250 MHz585 - 675 MHz
CPU in Adreno 612GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6788 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6758 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
min: 3079     avg: 3323     median: 3436 (2%)     max: 3455 Points
482 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
min: 864     avg: 936     median: 970 (1%)     max: 974 Points
143 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
3589 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 97354     avg: 108080     median: 106829 (11%)     max: 118129 Points
min: 26320     avg: 28142     median: 26734 (3%)     max: 31129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
min: 5268     avg: 7441     median: 7659 (33%)     max: 8661 Points
min: 1621     avg: 1897     median: 1737 (8%)     max: 2344 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
min: 6358     avg: 9988     median: 10199 (22%)     max: 12070 Points
min: 1571     avg: 1784     median: 1614 (4%)     max: 2245 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
min: 3969     avg: 6014     median: 6182 (26%)     max: 6981 Points
min: 1057     avg: 1207     median: 1110 (5%)     max: 1499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
min: 5184     avg: 7016     median: 7072.5 (18%)     max: 8218 Points
min: 851     avg: 1030     median: 955 (2%)     max: 1303 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
min: 5251     avg: 7260     median: 7443 (66%)     max: 8338 Points
min: 1606     avg: 1849     median: 1745 (16%)     max: 2285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
min: 6122     avg: 9542     median: 9754.5 (59%)     max: 11259 Points
min: 1427     avg: 1715     median: 1594 (10%)     max: 2173 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
min: 4556     avg: 5605     median: 5670 (28%)     max: 6319 Points
min: 937     avg: 1108     median: 978 (5%)     max: 1480 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
min: 5429     avg: 6345     median: 6322.5 (21%)     max: 7150 Points
min: 823     avg: 952     median: 829 (3%)     max: 1286 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
6.6 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
min: 8.5     avg: 17.5     median: 17 (3%)     max: 39 fps
min: 3     avg: 3.6     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 4.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
min: 16     avg: 40.5     median: 42 (3%)     max: 47 fps
min: 9     avg: 9.4     median: 9.1 (1%)     max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
min: 22     avg: 40.2     median: 42 (4%)     max: 48 fps
min: 8     avg: 8.5     median: 8.2 (1%)     max: 9.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
min: 35     avg: 64.4     median: 69 (1%)     max: 79 fps
min: 14     avg: 15.7     median: 15 (0%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
min: 50     avg: 94.7     median: 99.5 (4%)     max: 112 fps
min: 20     avg: 22     median: 21 (1%)     max: 25 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 640
min: 85     avg: 158.9     median: 166 (1%)     max: 185 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612
min: 41     avg: 43     median: 41 (0%)     max: 47 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
min: 204205     avg: 204715     median: 204715 (20%)     max: 205225 Points
43224 Points (4%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (3%)
64.9 fps (2%)
14.3 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
2968 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (2%)
2419 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10504     avg: 18251     median: 14922.5 (5%)     max: 40654 Points
min: 9815     avg: 16853     median: 16853 (6%)     max: 23891 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4244     avg: 11804     median: 5422.5 (9%)     max: 44840 Points
min: 1491     avg: 8575     median: 8575 (14%)     max: 15659 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
7.8 Watt (3%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 640 → 58% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 11% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
45%
Adreno 640:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
45%
Adreno 612:
30  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
91%
Adreno 612:
40  fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
134%
Adreno 640:
30 30 30 40 40 40 59 60 60 ~ 43 fps
94%
Adreno 612:
30  fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
Adreno 640:
60  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 640:
59 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Adreno 640:
30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 62 ~ 57 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 640:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Adreno 640:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 612:
60  fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
Adreno 640:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 640:
60 120 ~ 90 fps
Adreno 612:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 640:
28 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 60 ~ 36 fps
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
high
Adreno 640:
28 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 33 fps
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Adreno 640:
120  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 640:
60 120 ~ 90 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 640 → 90%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 134%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 76%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 91%

Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 640Qualcomm Adreno 612
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
Call of Duty Mobile60
Genshin Impact59.559.358.2
Armajet673030
PUBG Mobile4439.532434030
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 640Qualcomm Adreno 612
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1

2


1
2

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






2










< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1





2










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.34
log 07. 13:45:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9446 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759837533s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:57 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.025s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.025s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.017s ... 0.041s

#10 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.005s ... 0.047s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9446 +0s ... 0.047s

#12 got single benchmarks 9446 +0.004s ... 0.051s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0s ... 0.051s

#14 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.008s ... 0.059s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.067s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.068s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.069s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.07s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.083s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.083s

#22 Got 91 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.094s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.094s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.095s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.1s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.1s

#27 return log +0s ... 0.101s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)