Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 165H vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

Intel Core Ultra 7 165H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 165H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. The 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 5.0 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz. Two of the 10 E-cores are located in the Low Power Island.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 165H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 165H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 165H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 165H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840U

The Ryzen 7 7840U is a powerful laptop processor (APU) of the Phoenix product family. Its eight Zen 4 cores run at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. The great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties; the 7840U also features Ryzen AI which is AMD's answer to Intel's GNA and DL Boost.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has.

More importantly, Zen 4 introduces some rather solid AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840U has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds of up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems built around the 7840U are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840U in our extensive database is about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This means the Ryzen 7 APU packs quite a wallop, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 35 W, the Framework Laptop 13.5 is among the fastest systems powered by the 7840U that we know of. It can be about 30% faster than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of December 2023.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value significantly, with values as low as 15 W and as high as 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 7840U is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 165HAMD Ryzen 7 7840U
CodenameMeteor Lake-HPhoenix-U (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4) Phoenix-U (Zen 4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H « 3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5000 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 5.0 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2300 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 165H
37.6 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840U
37.8 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103.3 Points (58%)
min: 81     avg: 89.7     median: 91 (51%)     max: 97 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 616     avg: 690     median: 690 (13%)     max: 764 Points
min: 609     avg: 702     median: 730 (14%)     max: 768 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14055     avg: 14783     median: 14551 (14%)     max: 15743 Points
min: 11739     avg: 12884     median: 12719 (12%)     max: 15074 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1668     avg: 1731     median: 1759 (74%)     max: 1766 Points
min: 1373     avg: 1646     median: 1677.5 (71%)     max: 1742 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 674     avg: 681     median: 683 (74%)     max: 687 Points
min: 533     avg: 644     median: 661.5 (72%)     max: 678 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5471     avg: 5640     median: 5545 (14%)     max: 5904 Points
min: 4469     avg: 5039     median: 4967.5 (12%)     max: 5917 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2467     avg: 2583     median: 2641 (17%)     max: 2642 Points
min: 1024.7     avg: 1946     median: 1990 (13%)     max: 2439 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 257     avg: 258     median: 257 (71%)     max: 260 Points
min: 217     avg: 256.3     median: 264 (73%)     max: 272 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 20.46     avg: 22.6     median: 22.6 (29%)     max: 24.8 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.6     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (66%)     max: 2.97 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5996     avg: 6669     median: 6669 (40%)     max: 7342 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 36812     avg: 38490     median: 38489.5 (28%)     max: 40167 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 59874     avg: 63534     median: 63533.5 (41%)     max: 67193 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 11172     avg: 12089     median: 12089 (15%)     max: 13006 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
87.1 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
565 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
17.8 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 5629     avg: 5723     median: 5723 (9%)     max: 5817 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 54741     avg: 58029     median: 56997 (33%)     max: 62349 MIPS
min: 50087     avg: 55687     median: 55145 (32%)     max: 62156 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4939     avg: 5200     median: 5273 (62%)     max: 5387 MIPS
min: 4657     avg: 5816     median: 5952 (70%)     max: 6408 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 105.52     avg: 108.8     median: 108.8 (36%)     max: 112.1 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 232     avg: 237.3     median: 237.3 (55%)     max: 242.64 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.4     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (27%)     max: 16 fps
min: 14.4     avg: 15.7     median: 15.2 (27%)     max: 18.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.953     avg: 1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.5     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (27%)     max: 1.6 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 6.1     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (22%)     max: 10.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 406     avg: 435     median: 435 (6%)     max: 464 Seconds
min: 332     avg: 418.5     median: 421 (5%)     max: 503 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 231     avg: 246     median: 246 (2%)     max: 261 Seconds
min: 208     avg: 250.7     median: 259.5 (2%)     max: 270 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4565     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4686 sec
min: 0.4559     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.581 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12402     avg: 12635     median: 12482 (27%)     max: 13021 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.238     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 9.397 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.168     avg: 20.9     median: 20.9 (1%)     max: 23.633 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 626.26     avg: 706     median: 705.7 (3%)     max: 785.226 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 60726     avg: 63048     median: 63563 (49%)     max: 64340 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 18101     avg: 20276     median: 20275.5 (50%)     max: 22450 Points
min: 12375     avg: 16776     median: 16474 (41%)     max: 19923 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 64410     avg: 71391     median: 72497 (59%)     max: 76886 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 64515     avg: 70689     median: 72428 (59%)     max: 75123 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 65423     avg: 72363     median: 74802 (60%)     max: 76863 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13733     avg: 14430     median: 14429.5 (37%)     max: 15126 Points
min: 9655     avg: 15204     median: 16264 (41%)     max: 17714 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23240     avg: 23582     median: 23582 (42%)     max: 23924 Points
min: 17823     avg: 21641     median: 21584 (38%)     max: 25050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7617     avg: 8260     median: 8259.5 (35%)     max: 8902 Points
min: 6548     avg: 8155     median: 8138.5 (34%)     max: 9501 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2358     avg: 2429     median: 2421.5 (60%)     max: 2513 Points
min: 1982     avg: 2367     median: 2394 (60%)     max: 2562 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11616     avg: 12341     median: 12230.5 (47%)     max: 13288 Points
min: 7310     avg: 9791     median: 10584 (41%)     max: 11489 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1925     avg: 2150     median: 2149.5 (68%)     max: 2374 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 9176     avg: 9796     median: 9796 (40%)     max: 10416 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1688     avg: 1782     median: 1793.5 (70%)     max: 1853 Points
min: 1355     avg: 1705     median: 1738 (68%)     max: 1933 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11733     avg: 12010     median: 12051.5 (22%)     max: 12204 Points
min: 7399     avg: 9113     median: 9382 (17%)     max: 10558 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1411     avg: 1488     median: 1487.5 (6%)     max: 1564 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8055     avg: 8417     median: 8417 (27%)     max: 8779 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6140 Points (61%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30359     avg: 32401     median: 32400.5 (32%)     max: 34442 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 514     avg: 518     median: 517.5 (1%)     max: 521 ms
min: 509     avg: 567     median: 550 (1%)     max: 746 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 81820     avg: 82676     median: 82676 (61%)     max: 83532 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 259     avg: 263     median: 263 (72%)     max: 267 Points
min: 179.4     avg: 216.6     median: 208 (57%)     max: 256 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 291     avg: 293     median: 293 (53%)     max: 295 Points
min: 188.4     avg: 262.1     median: 262 (47%)     max: 322 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1690     avg: 1751     median: 1692 (63%)     max: 1872 Points
min: 1256     avg: 1498     median: 1533.5 (57%)     max: 1804 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 55.7     avg: 58.2     median: 58.2 (10%)     max: 60.6 Watt
min: 33.1     avg: 45.7     median: 47.2 (8%)     max: 54.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 64.8     avg: 79.7     median: 79.7 (15%)     max: 94.6 Watt
min: 36.2     avg: 42.6     median: 41.4 (8%)     max: 50.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.51     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (3%)     max: 6.73 Watt
min: 3.38     avg: 8.6     median: 7.8 (5%)     max: 14.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.01     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (6%)     max: 7.51 Watt
min: 3.99     avg: 7.7     median: 6.2 (7%)     max: 15.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 27.9     avg: 33     median: 33 (25%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt
min: 42.1     avg: 48     median: 47.1 (35%)     max: 55.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 165H → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840U → 94% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 17. 15:00:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16905 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15023 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755435657s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16905 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 16905 +0.008s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15023 +0.005s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 15023 +0.015s ... 0.038s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.08s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.083s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)